{"title":"CSAIL2019 密码谜题求解器架构","authors":"Sergey Gribok, Bogdan Pasca, Martin Langhammer","doi":"10.1145/3639056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The CSAIL2019 time-lock puzzle is an unsolved cryptographic challenge introduced by Ron Rivest in 2019, replacing the solved LCS35 puzzle. Solving these types of puzzles requires large amounts of intrinsically sequential computations, with each iteration performing a very large (3072-bit for CSAIL2019) modular multiplication operation. The complexity of each iteration is several times greater than known FPGA implementations, and the number of iterations has been increased by about 1000x compared to LCS35. Because of the high complexity of this new puzzle, a number of intermediate, or milestone versions of the puzzle have been specified. In this article, we present several FPGA architectures for the CSAIL2019 solver, which we implement on a medium-sized Intel Agilex device. We develop a new multi-cycle modular multiplication method, which is flexible and can fit on a wide variety of sizes of current FPGAs. We introduce a class of multi-cycle squarer-based architectures that allow for better resource and area trade-offs. We also demonstrate a new approach for improving the fitting and timing closure of large, chip-filling arithmetic designs. We used the solver to compute the first 22 out of the 28 milestone solutions of the puzzle, which are the first reported results for this problem.</p>","PeriodicalId":49248,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CSAIL2019 Crypto-Puzzle Solver Architecture\",\"authors\":\"Sergey Gribok, Bogdan Pasca, Martin Langhammer\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3639056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The CSAIL2019 time-lock puzzle is an unsolved cryptographic challenge introduced by Ron Rivest in 2019, replacing the solved LCS35 puzzle. Solving these types of puzzles requires large amounts of intrinsically sequential computations, with each iteration performing a very large (3072-bit for CSAIL2019) modular multiplication operation. The complexity of each iteration is several times greater than known FPGA implementations, and the number of iterations has been increased by about 1000x compared to LCS35. Because of the high complexity of this new puzzle, a number of intermediate, or milestone versions of the puzzle have been specified. In this article, we present several FPGA architectures for the CSAIL2019 solver, which we implement on a medium-sized Intel Agilex device. We develop a new multi-cycle modular multiplication method, which is flexible and can fit on a wide variety of sizes of current FPGAs. We introduce a class of multi-cycle squarer-based architectures that allow for better resource and area trade-offs. We also demonstrate a new approach for improving the fitting and timing closure of large, chip-filling arithmetic designs. We used the solver to compute the first 22 out of the 28 milestone solutions of the puzzle, which are the first reported results for this problem.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3639056\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3639056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The CSAIL2019 time-lock puzzle is an unsolved cryptographic challenge introduced by Ron Rivest in 2019, replacing the solved LCS35 puzzle. Solving these types of puzzles requires large amounts of intrinsically sequential computations, with each iteration performing a very large (3072-bit for CSAIL2019) modular multiplication operation. The complexity of each iteration is several times greater than known FPGA implementations, and the number of iterations has been increased by about 1000x compared to LCS35. Because of the high complexity of this new puzzle, a number of intermediate, or milestone versions of the puzzle have been specified. In this article, we present several FPGA architectures for the CSAIL2019 solver, which we implement on a medium-sized Intel Agilex device. We develop a new multi-cycle modular multiplication method, which is flexible and can fit on a wide variety of sizes of current FPGAs. We introduce a class of multi-cycle squarer-based architectures that allow for better resource and area trade-offs. We also demonstrate a new approach for improving the fitting and timing closure of large, chip-filling arithmetic designs. We used the solver to compute the first 22 out of the 28 milestone solutions of the puzzle, which are the first reported results for this problem.
期刊介绍:
TRETS is the top journal focusing on research in, on, and with reconfigurable systems and on their underlying technology. The scope, rationale, and coverage by other journals are often limited to particular aspects of reconfigurable technology or reconfigurable systems. TRETS is a journal that covers reconfigurability in its own right.
Topics that would be appropriate for TRETS would include all levels of reconfigurable system abstractions and all aspects of reconfigurable technology including platforms, programming environments and application successes that support these systems for computing or other applications.
-The board and systems architectures of a reconfigurable platform.
-Programming environments of reconfigurable systems, especially those designed for use with reconfigurable systems that will lead to increased programmer productivity.
-Languages and compilers for reconfigurable systems.
-Logic synthesis and related tools, as they relate to reconfigurable systems.
-Applications on which success can be demonstrated.
The underlying technology from which reconfigurable systems are developed. (Currently this technology is that of FPGAs, but research on the nature and use of follow-on technologies is appropriate for TRETS.)
In considering whether a paper is suitable for TRETS, the foremost question should be whether reconfigurability has been essential to success. Topics such as architecture, programming languages, compilers, and environments, logic synthesis, and high performance applications are all suitable if the context is appropriate. For example, an architecture for an embedded application that happens to use FPGAs is not necessarily suitable for TRETS, but an architecture using FPGAs for which the reconfigurability of the FPGAs is an inherent part of the specifications (perhaps due to a need for re-use on multiple applications) would be appropriate for TRETS.