慢性肾病或终末期肾病患者的液体复苏和败血症管理:范围界定综述。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE American Journal of Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4037/ajcc2024756
Matt Haley, Nasim Khosravi Foroutan, Juliann M Gronquist, Raju Reddy, Raghav Wusirika, Akram Khan
{"title":"慢性肾病或终末期肾病患者的液体复苏和败血症管理:范围界定综述。","authors":"Matt Haley, Nasim Khosravi Foroutan, Juliann M Gronquist, Raju Reddy, Raghav Wusirika, Akram Khan","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2024756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Managing sepsis and fluid resuscitation in patients with chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease is challenging for health care providers. Nurses are essential for early identification and treatment of these patients. Nurse education on assessing perfusion and implementing 3-hour bundled care can improve mortality rates in patients with sepsis. In this scoping review, initial screening identified 1176 articles published from 2015 through 2023 in the National Library of Medicine database; 29 articles were included in the literature summary and evidence synthesis. A systematic review meta-analysis was not possible because of data heterogeneity. The review revealed that most patients with chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease received more conservative resuscitation than did the general population, most likely because of concerns about volume overload. However, patients with chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease could tolerate the standard initial fluid resuscitation bolus of 30 mL/kg for sepsis. Outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease were similar to outcomes in patients without those conditions, whether they received standard or conservative fluid resuscitation. Patients who received the standard (higher) fluid resuscitation volume did not have increased rates of complications such as longer duration of mechanical ventilation, increased mortality, or prolonged length of stay. Using fluid responsiveness to guide resuscitation was associated with improved outcomes. The standard initial fluid resuscitation bolus of 30 mL/kg may be safe for patients with chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease and sepsis. Fluid responsiveness could be a valuable resuscitation criterion, promoting better decision-making by multidisciplinary teams. Further research is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"33 1","pages":"45-53"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluid Resuscitation and Sepsis Management in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease or End-Stage Renal Disease: Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Matt Haley, Nasim Khosravi Foroutan, Juliann M Gronquist, Raju Reddy, Raghav Wusirika, Akram Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.4037/ajcc2024756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Managing sepsis and fluid resuscitation in patients with chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease is challenging for health care providers. Nurses are essential for early identification and treatment of these patients. Nurse education on assessing perfusion and implementing 3-hour bundled care can improve mortality rates in patients with sepsis. In this scoping review, initial screening identified 1176 articles published from 2015 through 2023 in the National Library of Medicine database; 29 articles were included in the literature summary and evidence synthesis. A systematic review meta-analysis was not possible because of data heterogeneity. The review revealed that most patients with chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease received more conservative resuscitation than did the general population, most likely because of concerns about volume overload. However, patients with chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease could tolerate the standard initial fluid resuscitation bolus of 30 mL/kg for sepsis. Outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease were similar to outcomes in patients without those conditions, whether they received standard or conservative fluid resuscitation. Patients who received the standard (higher) fluid resuscitation volume did not have increased rates of complications such as longer duration of mechanical ventilation, increased mortality, or prolonged length of stay. Using fluid responsiveness to guide resuscitation was associated with improved outcomes. The standard initial fluid resuscitation bolus of 30 mL/kg may be safe for patients with chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease and sepsis. Fluid responsiveness could be a valuable resuscitation criterion, promoting better decision-making by multidisciplinary teams. Further research is required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"45-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2024756\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2024756","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于医护人员来说,处理慢性肾病或终末期肾病患者的败血症和液体复苏是一项挑战。护士对于这些患者的早期识别和治疗至关重要。对护士进行灌注评估教育并实施 3 小时捆绑式护理可提高脓毒症患者的死亡率。在此次范围界定综述中,通过初步筛选,在美国国家医学图书馆数据库中找到了 2015 年至 2023 年期间发表的 1176 篇文章;29 篇文章被纳入文献摘要和证据综述。由于数据存在异质性,因此无法进行系统综述荟萃分析。综述显示,大多数慢性肾病或终末期肾病患者接受的复苏比普通人群更保守,这很可能是因为担心容量超负荷。不过,慢性肾病或终末期肾病患者可以耐受脓毒症患者 30 毫升/千克的标准初始液体复苏剂量。慢性肾脏病或终末期肾病患者无论是接受标准液体复苏还是保守液体复苏,其结果都与无上述情况的患者相似。接受标准(较高)液体复苏量的患者并没有增加并发症的发生率,如机械通气时间延长、死亡率增加或住院时间延长。使用液体反应来指导复苏与改善预后有关。对于患有慢性肾病或终末期肾病以及脓毒症的患者来说,30 毫升/千克的标准初始液体复苏栓可能是安全的。液体反应性可能是一项有价值的复苏标准,有助于多学科团队做出更好的决策。还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fluid Resuscitation and Sepsis Management in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease or End-Stage Renal Disease: Scoping Review.

Managing sepsis and fluid resuscitation in patients with chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease is challenging for health care providers. Nurses are essential for early identification and treatment of these patients. Nurse education on assessing perfusion and implementing 3-hour bundled care can improve mortality rates in patients with sepsis. In this scoping review, initial screening identified 1176 articles published from 2015 through 2023 in the National Library of Medicine database; 29 articles were included in the literature summary and evidence synthesis. A systematic review meta-analysis was not possible because of data heterogeneity. The review revealed that most patients with chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease received more conservative resuscitation than did the general population, most likely because of concerns about volume overload. However, patients with chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease could tolerate the standard initial fluid resuscitation bolus of 30 mL/kg for sepsis. Outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease were similar to outcomes in patients without those conditions, whether they received standard or conservative fluid resuscitation. Patients who received the standard (higher) fluid resuscitation volume did not have increased rates of complications such as longer duration of mechanical ventilation, increased mortality, or prolonged length of stay. Using fluid responsiveness to guide resuscitation was associated with improved outcomes. The standard initial fluid resuscitation bolus of 30 mL/kg may be safe for patients with chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease and sepsis. Fluid responsiveness could be a valuable resuscitation criterion, promoting better decision-making by multidisciplinary teams. Further research is required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) invite authors to submit original manuscripts describing investigations, advances, or observations from all specialties related to the care of critically and acutely ill patients. Papers promoting collaborative practice and research are encouraged. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and have been submitted solely to AJCC.
期刊最新文献
Association of Area Deprivation Index With Mortality in Critically Ill Adults With COVID-19. Chest Discomfort After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Clinical Pearls. Discussion Guide for the Wool Article. Factors Associated With Parent-Perceived Miscommunication in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1