瑞典经导管主动脉瓣植入术可用性区域评估:一项长期观察研究。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad076
Konrad Nilsson, Daniel Lindholm, Jenny Backes, Henrik Bjursten, Henrik Hagström, Johan Lindbäck, Pétur Pétursson, Magnus Settergren, Giovanna Sarno, Stefan James
{"title":"瑞典经导管主动脉瓣植入术可用性区域评估:一项长期观察研究。","authors":"Konrad Nilsson, Daniel Lindholm, Jenny Backes, Henrik Bjursten, Henrik Hagström, Johan Lindbäck, Pétur Pétursson, Magnus Settergren, Giovanna Sarno, Stefan James","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an increasingly important treatment option for patients with severe aortic stenosis. Its best implementation is debated, as few centres with high volumes are associated with better outcomes, while centralization might lead to an inferior availability of treatment for patients living far away. The aim of this study was to investigate the implementation of TAVI in Sweden with a focus on regional differences in terms of availability, short-term mortality, and waiting times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients undergoing TAVI between 2008 and 2020 from the Swedish Transcatheter Cardiac Intervention Registry (SWENTRY) were included. SWENTRY was linked to the National Cause of Death Registry and to publicly available geospatial data from Statistics Sweden.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7280 patients were included. Over time, TAVI interventions increased markedly, while surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) remained constant. There were no statistically significant regional differences in incidence between counties with or without a local TAVI centre (P = 0.7) and no clustering tendencies around regions with a local TAVI centre (P = 0.99). Thirty-day mortality improved over time without evidence of regional differences. No regional differences in waiting time from decision to intervention were found for TAVI centre regions and non-TAVI centre regions (P = 0.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This nationwide study indicated no regional differences in terms of availability, short-term mortality, or waiting times. An organization with a few specialized centres was found to be sufficient to provide national coverage of TAVI interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"641-649"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537233/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional assessment of availability for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Sweden: a long-term observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Konrad Nilsson, Daniel Lindholm, Jenny Backes, Henrik Bjursten, Henrik Hagström, Johan Lindbäck, Pétur Pétursson, Magnus Settergren, Giovanna Sarno, Stefan James\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an increasingly important treatment option for patients with severe aortic stenosis. Its best implementation is debated, as few centres with high volumes are associated with better outcomes, while centralization might lead to an inferior availability of treatment for patients living far away. The aim of this study was to investigate the implementation of TAVI in Sweden with a focus on regional differences in terms of availability, short-term mortality, and waiting times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients undergoing TAVI between 2008 and 2020 from the Swedish Transcatheter Cardiac Intervention Registry (SWENTRY) were included. SWENTRY was linked to the National Cause of Death Registry and to publicly available geospatial data from Statistics Sweden.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7280 patients were included. Over time, TAVI interventions increased markedly, while surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) remained constant. There were no statistically significant regional differences in incidence between counties with or without a local TAVI centre (P = 0.7) and no clustering tendencies around regions with a local TAVI centre (P = 0.99). Thirty-day mortality improved over time without evidence of regional differences. No regional differences in waiting time from decision to intervention were found for TAVI centre regions and non-TAVI centre regions (P = 0.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This nationwide study indicated no regional differences in terms of availability, short-term mortality, or waiting times. An organization with a few specialized centres was found to be sufficient to provide national coverage of TAVI interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"641-649\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537233/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad076\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad076","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)是严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者越来越重要的治疗选择。其最佳实施方式尚存争议,因为数量少、手术量大的中心可获得更好的疗效,而集中化可能导致居住在远处的患者无法获得更好的治疗。本研究的目的是调查 TAVI 在瑞典的实施情况,重点关注在可用性、短期死亡率和等待时间方面的地区差异:方法:纳入瑞典经导管心脏介入登记处(SWENTRY)在2008年至2020年间接受TAVI的所有患者。SWENTRY与瑞典国家死因登记处以及瑞典统计局公开的地理空间数据相连接:结果:共纳入 7280 名患者。随着时间的推移,TAVI介入治疗显著增加,而外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)保持不变。在有或没有当地 TAVI 中心的县之间,发病率没有明显的地区差异(p = 0.7),在有当地 TAVI 中心的地区周围也没有聚集趋势(p = 0.99)。随着时间的推移,30 天死亡率有所提高,但没有证据表明存在地区差异。TAVI中心地区和非TAVI中心地区从决定到干预的等待时间没有地区差异(p = 0.7):这项全国性研究表明,在可用性、短期死亡率或等待时间方面没有地区差异。结论:这项全国性研究表明,在短期死亡率或等待时间方面没有地区差异。研究发现,一个拥有少数专业中心的组织足以提供覆盖全国的 TAVI 干预治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Regional assessment of availability for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Sweden: a long-term observational study.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an increasingly important treatment option for patients with severe aortic stenosis. Its best implementation is debated, as few centres with high volumes are associated with better outcomes, while centralization might lead to an inferior availability of treatment for patients living far away. The aim of this study was to investigate the implementation of TAVI in Sweden with a focus on regional differences in terms of availability, short-term mortality, and waiting times.

Methods: All patients undergoing TAVI between 2008 and 2020 from the Swedish Transcatheter Cardiac Intervention Registry (SWENTRY) were included. SWENTRY was linked to the National Cause of Death Registry and to publicly available geospatial data from Statistics Sweden.

Results: A total of 7280 patients were included. Over time, TAVI interventions increased markedly, while surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) remained constant. There were no statistically significant regional differences in incidence between counties with or without a local TAVI centre (P = 0.7) and no clustering tendencies around regions with a local TAVI centre (P = 0.99). Thirty-day mortality improved over time without evidence of regional differences. No regional differences in waiting time from decision to intervention were found for TAVI centre regions and non-TAVI centre regions (P = 0.7).

Conclusion: This nationwide study indicated no regional differences in terms of availability, short-term mortality, or waiting times. An organization with a few specialized centres was found to be sufficient to provide national coverage of TAVI interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.
期刊最新文献
Should we routinely measure patient quality of life after acute coronary syndrome? National health expenditure per capita is associated with CRT implantation practice: findings from the ESC CRT Survey II with 11 088 patients. Impact of intravascular ultrasound for coronary bifurcations treated with last generations stents: insights from the BIFURCAT-ULTRA registry. Treatment with PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies is associated with discontinuation of oral lipid lowering therapy. Quality indicators for improved cardiovascular care: learnings from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1