{"title":"腓肠肌腓骨肌皮瓣替代筋膜旋转皮瓣治疗下肢软组织缺损","authors":"Merlin Antúnez, Cormac Huyen, Rafael Neiman","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To report our experience using a peroneus brevis flap (PBF) for soft tissue defects of the distal third of the tibia, ankle, and hindfoot in resource-challenged environments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Rural outpatient surgical facility in Honduras.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients who sustained tibia, ankle, or hindfoot fractures or traumatic degloving, with critical-sized soft tissue defects treated with either a proximally based or distally based pedicled PBF to achieve coverage of the middle and distal third of the leg, ankle, and/or hindfoot.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Flap healing, complications, and reoperations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three patients, 4 with proximally based and 19 with distally based PBF flaps were included. The mean patient age was 37.3 (SD = 18.3; range 18-75 years). Duration of follow-up averaged 14.7 months (SD = 11.4; range 4-46). The PBF successfully covered the defect without the need for additional unplanned surgical flap coverage in all but 2 patients. Thirty percent of the PBFs received a split thickness skin graft, while the remainder granulated successfully without skin graft. Four flaps were partially debrided without additional flap mobilization, while 1 flap was lost completely. Ten patients had successful re-elevation of their flaps for secondary procedures such as implant removal, spacer exchange, deep debridements, and bone grafting. All donor site incisions healed without complication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pedicled PBF allows coverage of distal leg, ankle, and hindfoot wounds using muscle in patients who may otherwise require free tissue flaps or transfer to another institution for coverage. PBFs can be learned and implemented without the use of microvascular techniques.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":"e105-e110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10868666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pedicled Peroneus Brevis Muscle Flaps as an Alternative to Fasciocutaneous Rotational Flaps for Lower-Extremity Soft Tissue Defects.\",\"authors\":\"Merlin Antúnez, Cormac Huyen, Rafael Neiman\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To report our experience using a peroneus brevis flap (PBF) for soft tissue defects of the distal third of the tibia, ankle, and hindfoot in resource-challenged environments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Rural outpatient surgical facility in Honduras.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients who sustained tibia, ankle, or hindfoot fractures or traumatic degloving, with critical-sized soft tissue defects treated with either a proximally based or distally based pedicled PBF to achieve coverage of the middle and distal third of the leg, ankle, and/or hindfoot.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Flap healing, complications, and reoperations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three patients, 4 with proximally based and 19 with distally based PBF flaps were included. The mean patient age was 37.3 (SD = 18.3; range 18-75 years). Duration of follow-up averaged 14.7 months (SD = 11.4; range 4-46). The PBF successfully covered the defect without the need for additional unplanned surgical flap coverage in all but 2 patients. Thirty percent of the PBFs received a split thickness skin graft, while the remainder granulated successfully without skin graft. Four flaps were partially debrided without additional flap mobilization, while 1 flap was lost completely. Ten patients had successful re-elevation of their flaps for secondary procedures such as implant removal, spacer exchange, deep debridements, and bone grafting. All donor site incisions healed without complication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pedicled PBF allows coverage of distal leg, ankle, and hindfoot wounds using muscle in patients who may otherwise require free tissue flaps or transfer to another institution for coverage. PBFs can be learned and implemented without the use of microvascular techniques.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e105-e110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10868666/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002751\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002751","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pedicled Peroneus Brevis Muscle Flaps as an Alternative to Fasciocutaneous Rotational Flaps for Lower-Extremity Soft Tissue Defects.
Objectives: To report our experience using a peroneus brevis flap (PBF) for soft tissue defects of the distal third of the tibia, ankle, and hindfoot in resource-challenged environments.
Methods:
Design: Retrospective review.
Setting: Rural outpatient surgical facility in Honduras.
Patient selection criteria: Patients who sustained tibia, ankle, or hindfoot fractures or traumatic degloving, with critical-sized soft tissue defects treated with either a proximally based or distally based pedicled PBF to achieve coverage of the middle and distal third of the leg, ankle, and/or hindfoot.
Outcome measures and comparisons: Flap healing, complications, and reoperations.
Results: Twenty-three patients, 4 with proximally based and 19 with distally based PBF flaps were included. The mean patient age was 37.3 (SD = 18.3; range 18-75 years). Duration of follow-up averaged 14.7 months (SD = 11.4; range 4-46). The PBF successfully covered the defect without the need for additional unplanned surgical flap coverage in all but 2 patients. Thirty percent of the PBFs received a split thickness skin graft, while the remainder granulated successfully without skin graft. Four flaps were partially debrided without additional flap mobilization, while 1 flap was lost completely. Ten patients had successful re-elevation of their flaps for secondary procedures such as implant removal, spacer exchange, deep debridements, and bone grafting. All donor site incisions healed without complication.
Conclusions: The pedicled PBF allows coverage of distal leg, ankle, and hindfoot wounds using muscle in patients who may otherwise require free tissue flaps or transfer to another institution for coverage. PBFs can be learned and implemented without the use of microvascular techniques.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.