争议和社会经济因素如何影响干细胞研究。

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q3 LAW Issues in Law & Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Daniel P Casey, Grace M McCartney, Derek M Doroski
{"title":"争议和社会经济因素如何影响干细胞研究。","authors":"Daniel P Casey, Grace M McCartney, Derek M Doroski","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adult stem cells dominate worldwide stem cell clinical trials. We investigated factors that may explain levels of stem cell research across different countries. Stem cell trials from clinicaltrials.gov were counted and categorized based on the country, the type of stem cell used, and whether that type is ethically controversial. The trial data were compared with characteristics of the countries such as population and GDP. We looked at the general ethical position of the countries by ranking their favorability toward abortion via their legislation. We found GDP, which may be indicative of the interest and means a nation can put toward research, to be the most predictive measure of stem cell use. No correlation was found with national abortion legislation, which is an indicator of ethical positions on life issues in a country. Thus, it would seem that the use of stem cells, namely the significantly greater use of adult stem cells over other more controversial types, is likely to be more influenced by their scientific utility and not by other social or ethical opinions. In addition, ESC and other ethically controversial research does not appear to be necessary for the US to dominate worldwide stem cell research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48665,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Law & Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Controversy and Socioeconomic Factors Influence Stem Cell Research.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel P Casey, Grace M McCartney, Derek M Doroski\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adult stem cells dominate worldwide stem cell clinical trials. We investigated factors that may explain levels of stem cell research across different countries. Stem cell trials from clinicaltrials.gov were counted and categorized based on the country, the type of stem cell used, and whether that type is ethically controversial. The trial data were compared with characteristics of the countries such as population and GDP. We looked at the general ethical position of the countries by ranking their favorability toward abortion via their legislation. We found GDP, which may be indicative of the interest and means a nation can put toward research, to be the most predictive measure of stem cell use. No correlation was found with national abortion legislation, which is an indicator of ethical positions on life issues in a country. Thus, it would seem that the use of stem cells, namely the significantly greater use of adult stem cells over other more controversial types, is likely to be more influenced by their scientific utility and not by other social or ethical opinions. In addition, ESC and other ethically controversial research does not appear to be necessary for the US to dominate worldwide stem cell research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Issues in Law & Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Issues in Law & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Law & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

成人干细胞在全球干细胞临床试验中占主导地位。我们调查了可能解释不同国家干细胞研究水平的因素。我们统计了clinicaltrials.gov网站上的干细胞试验,并根据国家、使用的干细胞类型以及该类型是否存在伦理争议进行了分类。试验数据与人口和国内生产总值等国家特征进行了比较。我们通过对各国立法对堕胎的支持程度进行排名,了解各国的总体伦理立场。我们发现,国内生产总值是最能预测干细胞使用情况的指标。与国家堕胎立法没有相关性,而堕胎立法是一个国家对生命问题的伦理立场的指标。由此看来,干细胞的使用,即成人干细胞的使用明显多于其他更有争议的类型,可能更多是受其科学用途的影响,而不是受其他社会或伦理观点的影响。此外,ESC和其他有伦理争议的研究似乎并不是美国主导全球干细胞研究的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Controversy and Socioeconomic Factors Influence Stem Cell Research.

Adult stem cells dominate worldwide stem cell clinical trials. We investigated factors that may explain levels of stem cell research across different countries. Stem cell trials from clinicaltrials.gov were counted and categorized based on the country, the type of stem cell used, and whether that type is ethically controversial. The trial data were compared with characteristics of the countries such as population and GDP. We looked at the general ethical position of the countries by ranking their favorability toward abortion via their legislation. We found GDP, which may be indicative of the interest and means a nation can put toward research, to be the most predictive measure of stem cell use. No correlation was found with national abortion legislation, which is an indicator of ethical positions on life issues in a country. Thus, it would seem that the use of stem cells, namely the significantly greater use of adult stem cells over other more controversial types, is likely to be more influenced by their scientific utility and not by other social or ethical opinions. In addition, ESC and other ethically controversial research does not appear to be necessary for the US to dominate worldwide stem cell research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Issues in Law & Medicine
Issues in Law & Medicine Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Issues in Law & Medicine is a peer reviewed professional journal published semiannually. Founded in 1985, ILM is co-sponsored by the National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent & Disabled, Inc. and the Watson Bowes Research Institute. Issues is devoted to providing technical and informational assistance to attorneys, health care professionals, educators and administrators on legal, medical, and ethical issues arising from health care decisions. Its subscribers include law libraries, medical libraries, university libraries, court libraries, attorneys, physicians, university professors and other scholars, primarily in the U.S. and Canada, but also in Austria, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Italy, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom.
期刊最新文献
A Reanalysis of Mental Disorders Risk Following First-Trimester Abortions in Denmark. In Vitro Fertilization, State Wrongful Death Statutes and State Fetal Homicide Statutes: The Reaction to LePage v. Center for Reproductive Medicine. International Standards and Features of Financing in the Field of Health Care and Provision of Medical Services. Misleading Statements About "Life of the Mother" Exceptions in Pro-life Laws Require Correction. State Regulation of Ensuring the Quality Medical Care During Martial Law in Ukraine: Lessons for the International Community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1