Kylie Yen-Yi Lim, Kevin Chu, Nieroshan Rajarubendra, James Huang, David Pook, Paul Manohar, Matthew Harper, Scott Donnellan, Weranja Ranasinghe
{"title":"一家三级医疗中心对肌肉浸润性膀胱癌化疗的使用模式。","authors":"Kylie Yen-Yi Lim, Kevin Chu, Nieroshan Rajarubendra, James Huang, David Pook, Paul Manohar, Matthew Harper, Scott Donnellan, Weranja Ranasinghe","doi":"10.14440/bladder.2023.872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been demonstrated to have significant benefits to survival in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), the current utilization of NAC in Australia is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the patterns of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) use in patients undergoing cystectomy for MIBC at a large tertiary institution in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted using data of patients who underwent a radical cystectomy (RC) at a high-volume centre for MIBC between 2011 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 69 patients who had a cystectomy for ≥ pT2 bladder cancer, 73.9% were eligible for NAC. However, of those eligible, only five patients received NAC (9.8%). Of the total patients who were eligible for AC, only 44.4% received postoperative chemotherapy. Common reasons for the lack of uptake were due to patients being unfit or declining treatment. There was no difference in progression-free survival or overall survival in those who received NAC and AC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of patients undergoing RC for MIBC received AC compared to NAC, reflecting the real-world challenge of NAC uptake. This highlights the need for ongoing improvements in selection and usage of NAC and less reliance of AC utilization post RC.</p>","PeriodicalId":72421,"journal":{"name":"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)","volume":"10 ","pages":"e21200013"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10754695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of chemotherapy use in muscle-invasive bladder cancer in a tertiary centre.\",\"authors\":\"Kylie Yen-Yi Lim, Kevin Chu, Nieroshan Rajarubendra, James Huang, David Pook, Paul Manohar, Matthew Harper, Scott Donnellan, Weranja Ranasinghe\",\"doi\":\"10.14440/bladder.2023.872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been demonstrated to have significant benefits to survival in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), the current utilization of NAC in Australia is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the patterns of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) use in patients undergoing cystectomy for MIBC at a large tertiary institution in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted using data of patients who underwent a radical cystectomy (RC) at a high-volume centre for MIBC between 2011 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 69 patients who had a cystectomy for ≥ pT2 bladder cancer, 73.9% were eligible for NAC. However, of those eligible, only five patients received NAC (9.8%). Of the total patients who were eligible for AC, only 44.4% received postoperative chemotherapy. Common reasons for the lack of uptake were due to patients being unfit or declining treatment. There was no difference in progression-free survival or overall survival in those who received NAC and AC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of patients undergoing RC for MIBC received AC compared to NAC, reflecting the real-world challenge of NAC uptake. This highlights the need for ongoing improvements in selection and usage of NAC and less reliance of AC utilization post RC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"e21200013\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10754695/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14440/bladder.2023.872\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14440/bladder.2023.872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:尽管新辅助化疗(NAC)已被证实对肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)患者的生存有显著益处,但目前澳大利亚的新辅助化疗使用情况尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估澳大利亚一家大型三级医疗机构对接受膀胱切除术的肌浸润性膀胱癌患者使用新辅助化疗和辅助化疗(AC)的模式:一项回顾性研究使用了2011年至2021年期间在一家大医院接受根治性膀胱切除术(RC)的MIBC患者的数据:结果:在69名接受膀胱切除术的≥ pT2膀胱癌患者中,73.9%符合接受NAC的条件。然而,在符合条件的患者中,只有 5 名患者接受了 NAC(9.8%)。在所有符合 AC 治疗条件的患者中,只有 44.4% 接受了术后化疗。未接受化疗的常见原因是患者不适合或拒绝接受治疗。接受NAC和AC治疗的患者的无进展生存期和总生存期没有差异:结论:与NAC相比,大多数接受RC治疗的MIBC患者都接受了AC治疗,这反映了NAC治疗在现实世界中面临的挑战。这突出表明,需要不断改进 NAC 的选择和使用,减少 RC 后对 AC 使用的依赖。
Patterns of chemotherapy use in muscle-invasive bladder cancer in a tertiary centre.
Objectives: Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been demonstrated to have significant benefits to survival in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), the current utilization of NAC in Australia is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the patterns of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) use in patients undergoing cystectomy for MIBC at a large tertiary institution in Australia.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using data of patients who underwent a radical cystectomy (RC) at a high-volume centre for MIBC between 2011 and 2021.
Results: Of 69 patients who had a cystectomy for ≥ pT2 bladder cancer, 73.9% were eligible for NAC. However, of those eligible, only five patients received NAC (9.8%). Of the total patients who were eligible for AC, only 44.4% received postoperative chemotherapy. Common reasons for the lack of uptake were due to patients being unfit or declining treatment. There was no difference in progression-free survival or overall survival in those who received NAC and AC.
Conclusions: The majority of patients undergoing RC for MIBC received AC compared to NAC, reflecting the real-world challenge of NAC uptake. This highlights the need for ongoing improvements in selection and usage of NAC and less reliance of AC utilization post RC.