新发转移性乳腺癌中 21 基因复发评分的使用和结果。

IF 3.9 3区医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-05 DOI:10.1080/14737159.2024.2301940

Shi-Ping Yang, Ke Liu, Yang Li, Guan-Qiao Li, Jia-Yi Li, Yu-Yi Lin, San-Gang Wu

{"title":"新发转移性乳腺癌中 21 基因复发评分的使用和结果。","authors":"Shi-Ping Yang, Ke Liu, Yang Li, Guan-Qiao Li, Jia-Yi Li, Yu-Yi Lin, San-Gang Wu","doi":"10.1080/14737159.2024.2301940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Limited data exist regarding the utility and validity of the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) in patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC). This study aimed to investigate the practice patterns as well as associated survival outcomes based on 21-gene RS in dnMBC.Research design and methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Oncotype database was queried for women with hormone receptor-positive and Her2-negative dnMBC.Results: A total of 153 patients were identified, including 62.7% and 37.3% of patients who had RS < 26 and ≥ 26, respectively. Patients with RS ≥ 26 were more likely to receive chemotherapy compared to those with RS < 26 (61.4% vs. 28.1%, p < 0.001). Patients with RS ≥ 26 had an inferior breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (2-year BCSS: 84.3% vs. 89.5, p = 0.067) and overall survival (OS) compared to those with RS < 26 (2-year OS: 76.9% vs. 87.4%, p = 0.018). The multivariate Cox proportional hazard models showed that those with RS ≥ 26 had a significantly inferior BCSS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.251, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.056-4.799, p = 0.036) and OS (HR 2.151, 95%CI 1.123-4.120, p = 0.021) compared to those with RS < 26.Conclusions: The 21-gene RS assay is an important prognostic factor in patients with dnMBC.","PeriodicalId":12113,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":"99-106"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization and outcomes of the 21-gene recurrence score in de novo metastatic breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Shi-Ping Yang, Ke Liu, Yang Li, Guan-Qiao Li, Jia-Yi Li, Yu-Yi Lin, San-Gang Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737159.2024.2301940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Limited data exist regarding the utility and validity of the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) in patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC). This study aimed to investigate the practice patterns as well as associated survival outcomes based on 21-gene RS in dnMBC.Research design and methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Oncotype database was queried for women with hormone receptor-positive and Her2-negative dnMBC.Results: A total of 153 patients were identified, including 62.7% and 37.3% of patients who had RS < 26 and ≥ 26, respectively. Patients with RS ≥ 26 were more likely to receive chemotherapy compared to those with RS < 26 (61.4% vs. 28.1%, p < 0.001). Patients with RS ≥ 26 had an inferior breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (2-year BCSS: 84.3% vs. 89.5, p = 0.067) and overall survival (OS) compared to those with RS < 26 (2-year OS: 76.9% vs. 87.4%, p = 0.018). The multivariate Cox proportional hazard models showed that those with RS ≥ 26 had a significantly inferior BCSS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.251, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.056-4.799, p = 0.036) and OS (HR 2.151, 95%CI 1.123-4.120, p = 0.021) compared to those with RS < 26.Conclusions: The 21-gene RS assay is an important prognostic factor in patients with dnMBC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"99-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2024.2301940\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2024.2301940","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景：关于21基因复发评分（RS）在新发转移性乳腺癌（dnMBC）患者中的实用性和有效性的数据有限。本研究旨在调查基于 21 基因 RS 的 dnMBC 患者的实践模式及相关生存结果：研究设计：对激素受体阳性和 Her2 阴性 dnMBC 女性患者的监测、流行病学和最终结果 Oncotype 数据库进行了查询：共确定了153名患者，其中62.7%和37.3%的患者有RS（P = 0.067），总生存期（OS）与有RS的患者相比P = 0.018）。多变量考克斯比例危险模型显示，与RS结论者相比，RS≥26者的BCSS（危险比[HR]2.251，95%置信区间[CI]1.056-4.799，P = 0.036）和OS（HR 2.151，95%CI 1.123-4.120，P = 0.021）明显较差：21基因RS检测是dnMBC患者的重要预后因素。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Utilization and outcomes of the 21-gene recurrence score in de novo metastatic breast cancer.

Background: Limited data exist regarding the utility and validity of the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) in patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC). This study aimed to investigate the practice patterns as well as associated survival outcomes based on 21-gene RS in dnMBC.

Research design and methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Oncotype database was queried for women with hormone receptor-positive and Her2-negative dnMBC.

Results: A total of 153 patients were identified, including 62.7% and 37.3% of patients who had RS < 26 and ≥ 26, respectively. Patients with RS ≥ 26 were more likely to receive chemotherapy compared to those with RS < 26 (61.4% vs. 28.1%, p < 0.001). Patients with RS ≥ 26 had an inferior breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (2-year BCSS: 84.3% vs. 89.5, p = 0.067) and overall survival (OS) compared to those with RS < 26 (2-year OS: 76.9% vs. 87.4%, p = 0.018). The multivariate Cox proportional hazard models showed that those with RS ≥ 26 had a significantly inferior BCSS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.251, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.056-4.799, p = 0.036) and OS (HR 2.151, 95%CI 1.123-4.120, p = 0.021) compared to those with RS < 26.

Conclusions: The 21-gene RS assay is an important prognostic factor in patients with dnMBC.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics 医学-病理学

CiteScore

6.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

1 months

期刊介绍： Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (ISSN 1473-7159) publishes expert reviews of the latest advancements in the field of molecular diagnostics including the detection and monitoring of the molecular causes of disease that are being translated into groundbreaking diagnostic and prognostic technologies to be used in the clinical diagnostic setting. Each issue of Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics contains leading reviews on current and emerging topics relating to molecular diagnostics, subject to a rigorous peer review process; editorials discussing contentious issues in the field; diagnostic profiles featuring independent, expert evaluations of diagnostic tests; meeting reports of recent molecular diagnostics conferences and key paper evaluations featuring assessments of significant, recently published articles from specialists in molecular diagnostic therapy. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics provides the forum for reporting the critical advances being made in this ever-expanding field, as well as the major challenges ahead in their clinical implementation. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats: invaluable to a time-constrained community.