在健康成人中比较 SB17 和参考药物乌司替尼:随机、双盲、单剂量 I 期研究。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.5414/CP204492
Hansol Jeong, Taeseung Kang, Jiyoon Lee, Seongsik Im
{"title":"在健康成人中比较 SB17 和参考药物乌司替尼:随机、双盲、单剂量 I 期研究。","authors":"Hansol Jeong, Taeseung Kang, Jiyoon Lee, Seongsik Im","doi":"10.5414/CP204492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of SB17 (Samsung Bioepis, Incheon, Republic of Korea), a proposed biosimilar of ustekinumab (UST) against reference UST (Stelara, Janssen Biotech, Horsham, PA, USA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This double-blind, three-arm, parallel-group, single-dose study randomized 201 healthy adult subjects 1 : 1 : 1 to receive 45 mg of SB17, European Union-sourced UST (EU-UST) or United States of America-sourced UST (US-UST) via subcutaneous (SC) injection. Primary endpoints were area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC<sub>inf</sub>) and maximum serum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>). Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratios of AUC<sub>inf</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> between groups were within the predefined bioequivalence margin of 0.8 - 1.25. The geometric LSMeans ratios of AUC<sub>inf</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> were 0.99 and 0.90 for SB17/EU-UST, 1.01 and 0.94 for SB17/US-UST, and 1.02 and 1.05 for EU-UST/US-UST, respectively. The proportion of subjects with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was comparable between SB17, EU-UST, and US-UST (68.7, 58.2, and 65.7%). No deaths, serious adverse events (SAEs), or severe TEAEs were reported. The incidence of subjects testing positive for post-dose anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) was 26.9%, 34.3%, and 34.3% in the SB17, EU-UST, and US-UST groups, respectively. Among the subjects with a positive ADA result at day 99/end of study, 53.8% (SB17 n = 5, EU-UST n = 12, and US-UST n = 11) were positive for neutralizing antibodies (NAbs).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated bioequivalence of SB17, EU-UST, and US-UST in terms of PK. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were also comparable between all groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":13963,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"231-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11036876/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of SB17 and reference ustekinumab in healthy adults: A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, phase I study.\",\"authors\":\"Hansol Jeong, Taeseung Kang, Jiyoon Lee, Seongsik Im\",\"doi\":\"10.5414/CP204492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of SB17 (Samsung Bioepis, Incheon, Republic of Korea), a proposed biosimilar of ustekinumab (UST) against reference UST (Stelara, Janssen Biotech, Horsham, PA, USA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This double-blind, three-arm, parallel-group, single-dose study randomized 201 healthy adult subjects 1 : 1 : 1 to receive 45 mg of SB17, European Union-sourced UST (EU-UST) or United States of America-sourced UST (US-UST) via subcutaneous (SC) injection. Primary endpoints were area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC<sub>inf</sub>) and maximum serum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>). Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratios of AUC<sub>inf</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> between groups were within the predefined bioequivalence margin of 0.8 - 1.25. The geometric LSMeans ratios of AUC<sub>inf</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> were 0.99 and 0.90 for SB17/EU-UST, 1.01 and 0.94 for SB17/US-UST, and 1.02 and 1.05 for EU-UST/US-UST, respectively. The proportion of subjects with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was comparable between SB17, EU-UST, and US-UST (68.7, 58.2, and 65.7%). No deaths, serious adverse events (SAEs), or severe TEAEs were reported. The incidence of subjects testing positive for post-dose anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) was 26.9%, 34.3%, and 34.3% in the SB17, EU-UST, and US-UST groups, respectively. Among the subjects with a positive ADA result at day 99/end of study, 53.8% (SB17 n = 5, EU-UST n = 12, and US-UST n = 11) were positive for neutralizing antibodies (NAbs).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated bioequivalence of SB17, EU-UST, and US-UST in terms of PK. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were also comparable between all groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"231-240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11036876/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204492\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究比较了 SB17(Samsung Bioepis,大韩民国仁川)与参考 UST(Stelara,Janssen Biotech,美国宾夕法尼亚州霍舍姆)的药代动力学(PK)特征:这项双盲、三臂、平行组、单剂量研究将 201 名健康成年受试者按 1 : 1 : 1 的比例随机分组,通过皮下注射 45 毫克 SB17、欧盟来源 UST(EU-UST)或美国来源 UST(US-UST)。主要终点为从零时到无穷大的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUCinf)和最大血清浓度(Cmax)。对安全性、耐受性和免疫原性进行了研究:各组间 AUCinf 和 Cmax 比值的 90% 置信区间 (CI) 均在 0.8 - 1.25 的预定生物等效范围内。SB17/EU-UST的AUCinf和Cmax的几何最小值比分别为0.99和0.90,SB17/US-UST的几何最小值比分别为1.01和0.94,EU-UST/US-UST的几何最小值比分别为1.02和1.05。出现治疗突发不良事件(TEAEs)的受试者比例在 SB17、EU-UST 和 US-UST 之间相当(分别为 68.7%、58.2% 和 65.7%)。没有死亡、严重不良事件 (SAE) 或严重 TEAE 的报告。在 SB17、EU-UST 和 US-UST 组中,用药后抗药物抗体 (ADA) 检测呈阳性的受试者比例分别为 26.9%、34.3% 和 34.3%。在第99天/研究结束时ADA结果呈阳性的受试者中,53.8%(SB17 n = 5,EU-UST n = 12,US-UST n = 11)的中和抗体(NAbs)呈阳性:本研究证明了 SB17、EU-UST 和 US-UST 在 PK 方面的生物等效性。结论:该研究证明了 SB17、EU-UST 和 US-UST 在 PK 方面的生物等效性,各组之间的安全性、耐受性和免疫原性也相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of SB17 and reference ustekinumab in healthy adults: A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, phase I study.

Objective: This study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of SB17 (Samsung Bioepis, Incheon, Republic of Korea), a proposed biosimilar of ustekinumab (UST) against reference UST (Stelara, Janssen Biotech, Horsham, PA, USA).

Materials and methods: This double-blind, three-arm, parallel-group, single-dose study randomized 201 healthy adult subjects 1 : 1 : 1 to receive 45 mg of SB17, European Union-sourced UST (EU-UST) or United States of America-sourced UST (US-UST) via subcutaneous (SC) injection. Primary endpoints were area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUCinf) and maximum serum concentration (Cmax). Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were investigated.

Results: All 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratios of AUCinf and Cmax between groups were within the predefined bioequivalence margin of 0.8 - 1.25. The geometric LSMeans ratios of AUCinf and Cmax were 0.99 and 0.90 for SB17/EU-UST, 1.01 and 0.94 for SB17/US-UST, and 1.02 and 1.05 for EU-UST/US-UST, respectively. The proportion of subjects with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was comparable between SB17, EU-UST, and US-UST (68.7, 58.2, and 65.7%). No deaths, serious adverse events (SAEs), or severe TEAEs were reported. The incidence of subjects testing positive for post-dose anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) was 26.9%, 34.3%, and 34.3% in the SB17, EU-UST, and US-UST groups, respectively. Among the subjects with a positive ADA result at day 99/end of study, 53.8% (SB17 n = 5, EU-UST n = 12, and US-UST n = 11) were positive for neutralizing antibodies (NAbs).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated bioequivalence of SB17, EU-UST, and US-UST in terms of PK. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were also comparable between all groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics appears monthly and publishes manuscripts containing original material with emphasis on the following topics: Clinical trials, Pharmacoepidemiology - Pharmacovigilance, Pharmacodynamics, Drug disposition and Pharmacokinetics, Quality assurance, Pharmacogenetics, Biotechnological drugs such as cytokines and recombinant antibiotics. Case reports on adverse reactions are also of interest.
期刊最新文献
Identification of factors associated with vancomycin-induced acute kidney injury: A retrospective analysis using the Common Data Model. Retrospective evaluation of medical information for predicting tazobactam/piperacillin-induced liver injury. A disproportionality analysis of antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia based on FDA adverse event reporting system. Positive effects of magnesium supplementation in metabolic syndrome. Corrigendum for the article Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2024; 11: 525-533.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1