Behnood Bikdeli, Parham Sadeghipour, Junyang Lou, Antoine Bejjani, Candrika D Khairani, Sina Rashedi, Robert Lookstein, Alexandra Lansky, Suresh Vedantham, Piotr Sobieszczyk, Carlos Mena-Hurtado, Ayaz Aghayev, Peter Henke, Ghazaleh Mehdipoor, Antonella Tufano, Saurav Chatterjee, Saskia Middeldorp, Suman Wasan, Riyaz Bashir, Irene M Lang, Mehdi H Shishehbor, Marie Gerhard-Herman, Jay Giri, Matthew T Menard, Sahil A Parikh, Lucia Mazzolai, Lisa Moores, Manuel Monreal, David Jimenez, Samuel Z Goldhaber, Harlan M Krumholz, Gregory Piazza
{"title":"发育性或手术性腔静脉阻断与静脉血栓栓塞:综述。","authors":"Behnood Bikdeli, Parham Sadeghipour, Junyang Lou, Antoine Bejjani, Candrika D Khairani, Sina Rashedi, Robert Lookstein, Alexandra Lansky, Suresh Vedantham, Piotr Sobieszczyk, Carlos Mena-Hurtado, Ayaz Aghayev, Peter Henke, Ghazaleh Mehdipoor, Antonella Tufano, Saurav Chatterjee, Saskia Middeldorp, Suman Wasan, Riyaz Bashir, Irene M Lang, Mehdi H Shishehbor, Marie Gerhard-Herman, Jay Giri, Matthew T Menard, Sahil A Parikh, Lucia Mazzolai, Lisa Moores, Manuel Monreal, David Jimenez, Samuel Z Goldhaber, Harlan M Krumholz, Gregory Piazza","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1777991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The inferior vena cava (IVC) and superior vena cava are the main conduits of the systemic venous circulation into the right atrium. Developmental or procedural interruptions of vena cava might predispose to stasis and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) distal to the anomaly and may impact the subsequent rate of pulmonary embolism (PE). This study aimed to review the various etiologies of developmental or procedural vena cava interruption and their impact on venous thromboembolism. A systematic search was performed in PubMed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines per each clinical question. For management questions with no high-quality evidence and no mutual agreements between authors, Delphi methods were used. IVC agenesis is the most common form of congenital vena cava interruption, is associated with an increased risk of DVT, and should be suspected in young patients with unexpected extensive bilateral DVT. Surgical techniques for vena cava interruption (ligation, clipping, and plication) to prevent PE have been largely abandoned due to short-term procedural risks and long-term complications, although survivors of prior procedures are occasionally encountered. Vena cava filters are now the most commonly used method of procedural interruption, frequently placed in the infrarenal IVC. The most agreed-upon indication for vena cava filters is for patients with acute venous thromboembolism and coexisting contraindications to anticoagulation. Familiarity with different forms of vena cava interruption and their local and systemic adverse effects is important to minimize complications and thrombotic events.</p>","PeriodicalId":21673,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis","volume":" ","pages":"851-865"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developmental or Procedural Vena Cava Interruption and Venous Thromboembolism: A Review.\",\"authors\":\"Behnood Bikdeli, Parham Sadeghipour, Junyang Lou, Antoine Bejjani, Candrika D Khairani, Sina Rashedi, Robert Lookstein, Alexandra Lansky, Suresh Vedantham, Piotr Sobieszczyk, Carlos Mena-Hurtado, Ayaz Aghayev, Peter Henke, Ghazaleh Mehdipoor, Antonella Tufano, Saurav Chatterjee, Saskia Middeldorp, Suman Wasan, Riyaz Bashir, Irene M Lang, Mehdi H Shishehbor, Marie Gerhard-Herman, Jay Giri, Matthew T Menard, Sahil A Parikh, Lucia Mazzolai, Lisa Moores, Manuel Monreal, David Jimenez, Samuel Z Goldhaber, Harlan M Krumholz, Gregory Piazza\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1777991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The inferior vena cava (IVC) and superior vena cava are the main conduits of the systemic venous circulation into the right atrium. Developmental or procedural interruptions of vena cava might predispose to stasis and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) distal to the anomaly and may impact the subsequent rate of pulmonary embolism (PE). This study aimed to review the various etiologies of developmental or procedural vena cava interruption and their impact on venous thromboembolism. A systematic search was performed in PubMed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines per each clinical question. For management questions with no high-quality evidence and no mutual agreements between authors, Delphi methods were used. IVC agenesis is the most common form of congenital vena cava interruption, is associated with an increased risk of DVT, and should be suspected in young patients with unexpected extensive bilateral DVT. Surgical techniques for vena cava interruption (ligation, clipping, and plication) to prevent PE have been largely abandoned due to short-term procedural risks and long-term complications, although survivors of prior procedures are occasionally encountered. Vena cava filters are now the most commonly used method of procedural interruption, frequently placed in the infrarenal IVC. The most agreed-upon indication for vena cava filters is for patients with acute venous thromboembolism and coexisting contraindications to anticoagulation. Familiarity with different forms of vena cava interruption and their local and systemic adverse effects is important to minimize complications and thrombotic events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"851-865\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1777991\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1777991","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
下腔静脉(IVC)和上腔静脉是全身静脉循环进入右心房的主要通道。发育性或手术性腔静脉中断可能导致异常远端静脉淤滞和深静脉血栓形成(DVT),并可能影响随后的肺栓塞(PE)发病率。本研究旨在回顾发育性或手术性腔静脉中断的各种病因及其对静脉血栓栓塞的影响。根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,对每个临床问题在PubMed上进行了系统检索。对于没有高质量证据且作者之间未达成共识的管理问题,采用了德尔菲法。IVC缺损是先天性腔静脉中断最常见的形式,与深静脉血栓风险增加有关,应怀疑意外出现广泛双侧深静脉血栓的年轻患者。由于短期手术风险和长期并发症,预防 PE 的腔静脉阻断手术技术(结扎、剪断和钳夹)已基本被放弃,但偶尔也会遇到以前手术的幸存者。腔静脉滤器是目前最常用的手术阻断方法,通常放置在肾下静脉。腔静脉滤器最公认的适应症是急性静脉血栓栓塞和同时存在抗凝禁忌症的患者。熟悉不同形式的腔静脉阻断及其对局部和全身的不良影响对于最大限度地减少并发症和血栓事件非常重要。
Developmental or Procedural Vena Cava Interruption and Venous Thromboembolism: A Review.
The inferior vena cava (IVC) and superior vena cava are the main conduits of the systemic venous circulation into the right atrium. Developmental or procedural interruptions of vena cava might predispose to stasis and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) distal to the anomaly and may impact the subsequent rate of pulmonary embolism (PE). This study aimed to review the various etiologies of developmental or procedural vena cava interruption and their impact on venous thromboembolism. A systematic search was performed in PubMed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines per each clinical question. For management questions with no high-quality evidence and no mutual agreements between authors, Delphi methods were used. IVC agenesis is the most common form of congenital vena cava interruption, is associated with an increased risk of DVT, and should be suspected in young patients with unexpected extensive bilateral DVT. Surgical techniques for vena cava interruption (ligation, clipping, and plication) to prevent PE have been largely abandoned due to short-term procedural risks and long-term complications, although survivors of prior procedures are occasionally encountered. Vena cava filters are now the most commonly used method of procedural interruption, frequently placed in the infrarenal IVC. The most agreed-upon indication for vena cava filters is for patients with acute venous thromboembolism and coexisting contraindications to anticoagulation. Familiarity with different forms of vena cava interruption and their local and systemic adverse effects is important to minimize complications and thrombotic events.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis is a topic driven review journal that focuses on all issues relating to hemostatic and thrombotic disorders. As one of the premiere review journals in the field, Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis serves as a comprehensive forum for important advances in clinical and laboratory diagnosis and therapeutic interventions. The journal also publishes peer reviewed original research papers.
Seminars offers an informed perspective on today''s pivotal issues, including hemophilia A & B, thrombophilia, gene therapy, venous and arterial thrombosis, von Willebrand disease, vascular disorders and thromboembolic diseases. Attention is also given to the latest developments in pharmaceutical drugs along with treatment and current management techniques. The journal also frequently publishes sponsored supplements to further highlight emerging trends in the field.