基于深度学习的磁共振成像重建技术,用于改善胰腺减视野弥散加权成像的图像质量。

IF 1.4 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING World journal of radiology Pub Date : 2023-12-28 DOI:10.4329/wjr.v15.i12.338
Yukihisa Takayama, Keisuke Sato, Shinji Tanaka, Ryo Murayama, Nahoko Goto, Kengo Yoshimitsu
{"title":"基于深度学习的磁共振成像重建技术,用于改善胰腺减视野弥散加权成像的图像质量。","authors":"Yukihisa Takayama, Keisuke Sato, Shinji Tanaka, Ryo Murayama, Nahoko Goto, Kengo Yoshimitsu","doi":"10.4329/wjr.v15.i12.338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It has been reported that deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) can reduce image noise and artifacts, thereby improving the signal-to-noise ratio and image sharpness. However, no previous studies have evaluated the efficacy of DLR in improving image quality in reduced-field-of-view (reduced-FOV) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) [field-of-view optimized and constrained undistorted single-shot (FOCUS)] of the pancreas. We hypothesized that a combination of these techniques would improve DWI image quality without prolonging the scan time but would influence the apparent diffusion coefficient calculation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of DLR for image quality improvement of FOCUS of the pancreas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study evaluated 37 patients with pancreatic cystic lesions who underwent magnetic resonance imaging between August 2021 and October 2021. We evaluated three types of FOCUS examinations: FOCUS with DLR (FOCUS-DLR+), FOCUS without DLR (FOCUS-DLR-), and conventional FOCUS (FOCUS-conv). The three types of FOCUS and their apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were compared qualitatively and quantitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FOCUS-DLR+ (3.62, average score of two radiologists) showed significantly better qualitative scores for image noise than FOCUS-DLR- (2.62) and FOCUS-conv (2.88) (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Furthermore, FOCUS-DLR+ showed the highest contrast ratio (CR) between the pancreatic parenchyma and adjacent fat tissue for b-values of 0 and 600 s/mm<sup>2</sup> (0.72 ± 0.08 and 0.68 ± 0.08) and FOCUS-DLR- showed the highest CR between cystic lesions and the pancreatic parenchyma for the b-values of 0 and 600 s/mm<sup>2</sup> (0.62 ± 0.21 and 0.62 ± 0.21) (<i>P</i> < 0.05), respectively. FOCUS-DLR+ provided significantly higher ADCs of the pancreas and lesion (1.44 ± 0.24 and 3.00 ± 0.66) compared to FOCUS-DLR- (1.39 ± 0.22 and 2.86 ± 0.61) and significantly lower ADCs compared to FOCUS-conv (1.84 ± 0.45 and 3.32 ± 0.70) (<i>P</i> < 0.05), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study evaluated the efficacy of DLR for image quality improvement in reduced-FOV DWI of the pancreas. DLR can significantly denoise images without prolonging the scan time or decreasing the spatial resolution. The denoising level of DWI can be controlled to make the images appear more natural to the human eye. However, this study revealed that DLR did not ameliorate pancreatic distortion. Additionally, physicians should pay attention to the interpretation of ADCs after DLR application because ADCs are significantly changed by DLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":23819,"journal":{"name":"World journal of radiology","volume":"15 12","pages":"338-349"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10762521/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning-based magnetic resonance imaging reconstruction for improving the image quality of reduced-field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging of the pancreas.\",\"authors\":\"Yukihisa Takayama, Keisuke Sato, Shinji Tanaka, Ryo Murayama, Nahoko Goto, Kengo Yoshimitsu\",\"doi\":\"10.4329/wjr.v15.i12.338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It has been reported that deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) can reduce image noise and artifacts, thereby improving the signal-to-noise ratio and image sharpness. However, no previous studies have evaluated the efficacy of DLR in improving image quality in reduced-field-of-view (reduced-FOV) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) [field-of-view optimized and constrained undistorted single-shot (FOCUS)] of the pancreas. We hypothesized that a combination of these techniques would improve DWI image quality without prolonging the scan time but would influence the apparent diffusion coefficient calculation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of DLR for image quality improvement of FOCUS of the pancreas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study evaluated 37 patients with pancreatic cystic lesions who underwent magnetic resonance imaging between August 2021 and October 2021. We evaluated three types of FOCUS examinations: FOCUS with DLR (FOCUS-DLR+), FOCUS without DLR (FOCUS-DLR-), and conventional FOCUS (FOCUS-conv). The three types of FOCUS and their apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were compared qualitatively and quantitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FOCUS-DLR+ (3.62, average score of two radiologists) showed significantly better qualitative scores for image noise than FOCUS-DLR- (2.62) and FOCUS-conv (2.88) (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Furthermore, FOCUS-DLR+ showed the highest contrast ratio (CR) between the pancreatic parenchyma and adjacent fat tissue for b-values of 0 and 600 s/mm<sup>2</sup> (0.72 ± 0.08 and 0.68 ± 0.08) and FOCUS-DLR- showed the highest CR between cystic lesions and the pancreatic parenchyma for the b-values of 0 and 600 s/mm<sup>2</sup> (0.62 ± 0.21 and 0.62 ± 0.21) (<i>P</i> < 0.05), respectively. FOCUS-DLR+ provided significantly higher ADCs of the pancreas and lesion (1.44 ± 0.24 and 3.00 ± 0.66) compared to FOCUS-DLR- (1.39 ± 0.22 and 2.86 ± 0.61) and significantly lower ADCs compared to FOCUS-conv (1.84 ± 0.45 and 3.32 ± 0.70) (<i>P</i> < 0.05), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study evaluated the efficacy of DLR for image quality improvement in reduced-FOV DWI of the pancreas. DLR can significantly denoise images without prolonging the scan time or decreasing the spatial resolution. The denoising level of DWI can be controlled to make the images appear more natural to the human eye. However, this study revealed that DLR did not ameliorate pancreatic distortion. Additionally, physicians should pay attention to the interpretation of ADCs after DLR application because ADCs are significantly changed by DLR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of radiology\",\"volume\":\"15 12\",\"pages\":\"338-349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10762521/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v15.i12.338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v15.i12.338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:据报道,基于深度学习的重建(DLR)可以减少图像噪声和伪影,从而提高信噪比和图像清晰度。然而,之前没有研究评估过 DLR 在改善胰腺缩小视场(reduced-FOV)弥散加权成像(DWI)[视场优化和受限不失真单次成像(FOCUS)]图像质量方面的功效。目的:评估 DLR 对改善胰腺 FOCUS 图像质量的效果:这是一项回顾性研究,对 2021 年 8 月至 2021 年 10 月间接受磁共振成像的 37 例胰腺囊性病变患者进行了评估。我们评估了三种类型的 FOCUS 检查:带 DLR 的 FOCUS(FOCUS-DLR+)、不带 DLR 的 FOCUS(FOCUS-DLR-)和传统 FOCUS(FOCUS-conv)。对三种 FOCUS 及其表观弥散系数(ADC)图进行了定性和定量比较:结果:FOCUS-DLR+(3.62,两名放射科医生的平均分)的图像噪音定性评分明显优于 FOCUS-DLR-(2.62)和 FOCUS-conv(2.88)(P < 0.05)。此外,在 b 值为 0 和 600 s/mm2 时,FOCUS-DLR+ 显示胰腺实质与邻近脂肪组织之间的对比度 (CR) 最高(0.72 ± 0.08 和 0.68 ± 0.08),而在 b 值为 0 和 600 s/mm2 时,FOCUS-DLR- 显示囊性病变与胰腺实质之间的对比度 (CR) 最高(0.62 ± 0.21 和 0.62 ± 0.21)(P < 0.05)。与FOCUS-DLR-(1.39±0.22和2.86±0.61)相比,FOCUS-DLR+提供的胰腺和病灶的ADCs(1.44±0.24和3.00±0.66)明显更高,而与FOCUS-conv(1.84±0.45和3.32±0.70)相比,ADCs(1.84±0.45和3.32±0.70)明显更低(P<0.05):本研究评估了 DLR 对改善胰腺减小 FOV DWI 图像质量的效果。DLR 能在不延长扫描时间或降低空间分辨率的情况下对图像进行显著去噪。可以控制 DWI 的去噪水平,使图像在人眼看来更自然。但本研究显示,DLR 并未改善胰腺失真。此外,医生应注意应用 DLR 后 ADC 的解释,因为 DLR 会显著改变 ADC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep learning-based magnetic resonance imaging reconstruction for improving the image quality of reduced-field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging of the pancreas.

Background: It has been reported that deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) can reduce image noise and artifacts, thereby improving the signal-to-noise ratio and image sharpness. However, no previous studies have evaluated the efficacy of DLR in improving image quality in reduced-field-of-view (reduced-FOV) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) [field-of-view optimized and constrained undistorted single-shot (FOCUS)] of the pancreas. We hypothesized that a combination of these techniques would improve DWI image quality without prolonging the scan time but would influence the apparent diffusion coefficient calculation.

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of DLR for image quality improvement of FOCUS of the pancreas.

Methods: This was a retrospective study evaluated 37 patients with pancreatic cystic lesions who underwent magnetic resonance imaging between August 2021 and October 2021. We evaluated three types of FOCUS examinations: FOCUS with DLR (FOCUS-DLR+), FOCUS without DLR (FOCUS-DLR-), and conventional FOCUS (FOCUS-conv). The three types of FOCUS and their apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were compared qualitatively and quantitatively.

Results: FOCUS-DLR+ (3.62, average score of two radiologists) showed significantly better qualitative scores for image noise than FOCUS-DLR- (2.62) and FOCUS-conv (2.88) (P < 0.05). Furthermore, FOCUS-DLR+ showed the highest contrast ratio (CR) between the pancreatic parenchyma and adjacent fat tissue for b-values of 0 and 600 s/mm2 (0.72 ± 0.08 and 0.68 ± 0.08) and FOCUS-DLR- showed the highest CR between cystic lesions and the pancreatic parenchyma for the b-values of 0 and 600 s/mm2 (0.62 ± 0.21 and 0.62 ± 0.21) (P < 0.05), respectively. FOCUS-DLR+ provided significantly higher ADCs of the pancreas and lesion (1.44 ± 0.24 and 3.00 ± 0.66) compared to FOCUS-DLR- (1.39 ± 0.22 and 2.86 ± 0.61) and significantly lower ADCs compared to FOCUS-conv (1.84 ± 0.45 and 3.32 ± 0.70) (P < 0.05), respectively.

Conclusion: This study evaluated the efficacy of DLR for image quality improvement in reduced-FOV DWI of the pancreas. DLR can significantly denoise images without prolonging the scan time or decreasing the spatial resolution. The denoising level of DWI can be controlled to make the images appear more natural to the human eye. However, this study revealed that DLR did not ameliorate pancreatic distortion. Additionally, physicians should pay attention to the interpretation of ADCs after DLR application because ADCs are significantly changed by DLR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World journal of radiology
World journal of radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
8.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Asymmetric outcomes in bilateral maxillary impacted tooth extractions: A case report. Breast cancer imaging-clinical experience with two-dimensional-shear wave elastography: A retrospective study. Cryoablation for intrapulmonary bronchial cyst: A case report. Cystic ductal adenocarcinoma of pancreas complicated with neuroendocrine tumor: A case report and review of literature. Ectopic recurrence following treatment of arteriovenous malformations in an adult: A case report and review of literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1