在多个申报材料中使用相同的模型或建模策略:关注复杂药物产品。

IF 5 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY AAPS Journal Pub Date : 2024-01-04 DOI:10.1208/s12248-023-00879-2
Ross L Walenga, Andrew H Babiskin, Sid Bhoopathy, James F Clarke, Jan De Backer, Murray Ducharme, Marc Kelly, Maxime Le Merdy, Miyoung Yoon, Partha Roy
{"title":"在多个申报材料中使用相同的模型或建模策略:关注复杂药物产品。","authors":"Ross L Walenga, Andrew H Babiskin, Sid Bhoopathy, James F Clarke, Jan De Backer, Murray Ducharme, Marc Kelly, Maxime Le Merdy, Miyoung Yoon, Partha Roy","doi":"10.1208/s12248-023-00879-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence shows that there is an increasing use of modeling and simulation to support product development and approval for complex generic drug products in the USA, which includes the use of mechanistic modeling and model-integrated evidence (MIE). The potential for model reuse was the subject of a workshop session summarized in this review, where the session included presentations and a panel discussion from members of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), academia, and the generic drug product industry. Concepts such as platform performance assessment and MIE standardization were introduced to provide potential frameworks for model reuse related to mechanistic models and MIE, respectively. The capability of models to capture formulation and product differences was explored, and challenges with model validation were addressed for drug product classes including topical, orally inhaled, ophthalmic, and long-acting injectable drug products. An emphasis was placed on the need for communication between FDA and the generic drug industry to continue to foster maturation of modeling and simulation that may support complex generic drug product development and approval, via meetings and published guidance from FDA. The workshop session provided a snapshot of the current state of modeling and simulation for complex generic drug products and offered opportunities to explore the use of such models across multiple drug products.</p>","PeriodicalId":50934,"journal":{"name":"AAPS Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of the Same Model or Modeling Strategy Across Multiple Submissions: Focus on Complex Drug Products.\",\"authors\":\"Ross L Walenga, Andrew H Babiskin, Sid Bhoopathy, James F Clarke, Jan De Backer, Murray Ducharme, Marc Kelly, Maxime Le Merdy, Miyoung Yoon, Partha Roy\",\"doi\":\"10.1208/s12248-023-00879-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Evidence shows that there is an increasing use of modeling and simulation to support product development and approval for complex generic drug products in the USA, which includes the use of mechanistic modeling and model-integrated evidence (MIE). The potential for model reuse was the subject of a workshop session summarized in this review, where the session included presentations and a panel discussion from members of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), academia, and the generic drug product industry. Concepts such as platform performance assessment and MIE standardization were introduced to provide potential frameworks for model reuse related to mechanistic models and MIE, respectively. The capability of models to capture formulation and product differences was explored, and challenges with model validation were addressed for drug product classes including topical, orally inhaled, ophthalmic, and long-acting injectable drug products. An emphasis was placed on the need for communication between FDA and the generic drug industry to continue to foster maturation of modeling and simulation that may support complex generic drug product development and approval, via meetings and published guidance from FDA. The workshop session provided a snapshot of the current state of modeling and simulation for complex generic drug products and offered opportunities to explore the use of such models across multiple drug products.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AAPS Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AAPS Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-023-00879-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-023-00879-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有证据表明,美国越来越多地使用建模和模拟来支持复杂非专利药品的产品开发和审批,其中包括使用机理建模和模型整合证据(MIE)。美国食品药品管理局 (FDA)、学术界和非专利药产品行业的成员在研讨会上进行了发言和小组讨论,本综述对模型再利用的潜力进行了总结。会上介绍了平台性能评估和 MIE 标准化等概念,分别为与机理模型和 MIE 相关的模型再利用提供了潜在框架。会议探讨了模型捕捉制剂和产品差异的能力,并针对药物产品类别(包括外用、口服吸入、眼科和长效注射药物产品)探讨了模型验证所面临的挑战。会议强调了 FDA 和仿制药行业之间的沟通需求,以继续促进建模和仿真的成熟,从而通过会议和 FDA 发布的指南支持复杂仿制药产品的开发和审批。研讨会简要介绍了复杂仿制药产品建模和仿真的现状,并提供了探讨在多种药物产品中使用此类模型的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of the Same Model or Modeling Strategy Across Multiple Submissions: Focus on Complex Drug Products.

Evidence shows that there is an increasing use of modeling and simulation to support product development and approval for complex generic drug products in the USA, which includes the use of mechanistic modeling and model-integrated evidence (MIE). The potential for model reuse was the subject of a workshop session summarized in this review, where the session included presentations and a panel discussion from members of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), academia, and the generic drug product industry. Concepts such as platform performance assessment and MIE standardization were introduced to provide potential frameworks for model reuse related to mechanistic models and MIE, respectively. The capability of models to capture formulation and product differences was explored, and challenges with model validation were addressed for drug product classes including topical, orally inhaled, ophthalmic, and long-acting injectable drug products. An emphasis was placed on the need for communication between FDA and the generic drug industry to continue to foster maturation of modeling and simulation that may support complex generic drug product development and approval, via meetings and published guidance from FDA. The workshop session provided a snapshot of the current state of modeling and simulation for complex generic drug products and offered opportunities to explore the use of such models across multiple drug products.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AAPS Journal
AAPS Journal 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The AAPS Journal, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), publishes novel and significant findings in the various areas of pharmaceutical sciences impacting human and veterinary therapeutics, including: · Drug Design and Discovery · Pharmaceutical Biotechnology · Biopharmaceutics, Formulation, and Drug Delivery · Metabolism and Transport · Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacometrics · Translational Research · Clinical Evaluations and Therapeutic Outcomes · Regulatory Science We invite submissions under the following article types: · Original Research Articles · Reviews and Mini-reviews · White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials · Meeting Reports · Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications · Regulatory Notes · Tutorials · Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences In addition, The AAPS Journal publishes themes, organized by guest editors, which are focused on particular areas of current interest to our field.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Impact of Pharmacological Target-Mediated Low Plasma Exposure in Lead Compound Selection in Drug Discovery - A Modeling Approach. Luteolin Protects against Vascular Calcification by Modulating SIRT1/CXCR4 Signaling Pathway and Promoting Autophagy. Case Studies on the use of Microsampling for Nonclinical Studies in Pharmaceutical Drug Discovery and Development. Assessing Immunogenicity in Drug Reviews and Prescribing Information in Japan. Temperature Excursion Management: A Tier-Based Approach for Commercial Oral Solid Dosage Forms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1