遵守 COVID-19 协议:加纳公立和私立医院比较研究

IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health in Practice Pub Date : 2023-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.puhip.2023.100463
Mohammed A. Issah, Roger A. Atinga, Anita A. Baku
{"title":"遵守 COVID-19 协议:加纳公立和私立医院比较研究","authors":"Mohammed A. Issah,&nbsp;Roger A. Atinga,&nbsp;Anita A. Baku","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2023.100463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to comparatively examine how public and private hospitals adhered to the COVID-19 safety protocols, and the factors associated with, and barriers to adherence in Ghana.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>A case study design drawing on quantitative and qualitative methods to determine adherence to, and barrier of adherence to the COVID-19 protocols.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A sample of 283 staff participated in the quantitative study, while in-depth interviews were conducted among management staff across the public and private hospitals. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent <em>t</em>-test to compare differences in adherence and logistic regression model to identify the factors associated with adherence to the COVID-19 protocols.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The regression results showed that adherence to the COVID-19 protocols in public and private hospitals were significantly associated with staff training on adherence in public (OR = 2.08; p &lt; 0.01) and private (OR = 1.44; p &lt; 0.05), and knowledge on adherence in public (OR = 3.12; p &lt; 0.01) and private (OR = 11.45; p &lt; 0.01) hospitals. Adherence to the protocol varied significantly between public and private hospitals (0.001 &gt; p &lt; 0.05), with an effect size ranging from small to large. Clients’ behavioural factors and poor stocking of PPEs due to financial challenges were reported as barriers to adherence in both hospital types.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Adherence to the COVID-19 protocols was more pronounced in public hospitals than private hospitals suggesting the need for interventions targeting the latter to promote client and staff safety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100463"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266653522300109X/pdfft?md5=e80555704224e346a3b6f69758f3c23e&pid=1-s2.0-S266653522300109X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adherence to COVID-19 protocols: A comparative study of public and private hospitals in Ghana\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed A. Issah,&nbsp;Roger A. Atinga,&nbsp;Anita A. Baku\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.puhip.2023.100463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to comparatively examine how public and private hospitals adhered to the COVID-19 safety protocols, and the factors associated with, and barriers to adherence in Ghana.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>A case study design drawing on quantitative and qualitative methods to determine adherence to, and barrier of adherence to the COVID-19 protocols.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A sample of 283 staff participated in the quantitative study, while in-depth interviews were conducted among management staff across the public and private hospitals. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent <em>t</em>-test to compare differences in adherence and logistic regression model to identify the factors associated with adherence to the COVID-19 protocols.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The regression results showed that adherence to the COVID-19 protocols in public and private hospitals were significantly associated with staff training on adherence in public (OR = 2.08; p &lt; 0.01) and private (OR = 1.44; p &lt; 0.05), and knowledge on adherence in public (OR = 3.12; p &lt; 0.01) and private (OR = 11.45; p &lt; 0.01) hospitals. Adherence to the protocol varied significantly between public and private hospitals (0.001 &gt; p &lt; 0.05), with an effect size ranging from small to large. Clients’ behavioural factors and poor stocking of PPEs due to financial challenges were reported as barriers to adherence in both hospital types.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Adherence to the COVID-19 protocols was more pronounced in public hospitals than private hospitals suggesting the need for interventions targeting the latter to promote client and staff safety.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health in Practice\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100463\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266653522300109X/pdfft?md5=e80555704224e346a3b6f69758f3c23e&pid=1-s2.0-S266653522300109X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266653522300109X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266653522300109X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较研究加纳公立医院和私立医院如何遵守 COVID-19 安全协议,以及遵守协议的相关因素和障碍。研究设计采用案例研究设计,利用定量和定性方法确定遵守 COVID-19 协议的情况和障碍。研究采用描述性统计和独立 t 检验对数据进行分析,以比较遵守情况的差异,并采用逻辑回归模型确定与遵守 COVID-19 协议相关的因素。结果回归结果显示,公立医院和私立医院对COVID-19方案的依从性与公立医院(OR = 2.08; p <0.01)和私立医院(OR = 1.44; p <0.05)的员工依从性培训以及公立医院(OR = 3.12; p <0.01)和私立医院(OR = 11.45; p <0.01)的员工依从性知识显著相关。公立医院和私立医院对方案的依从性差异显著(0.001 > p <0.05),效应大小从大到小不等。结论:公立医院对 COVID-19 协议的遵守情况比私立医院更明显,这表明有必要针对私立医院采取干预措施,以促进客户和员工的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adherence to COVID-19 protocols: A comparative study of public and private hospitals in Ghana

Objective

This study aimed to comparatively examine how public and private hospitals adhered to the COVID-19 safety protocols, and the factors associated with, and barriers to adherence in Ghana.

Study design

A case study design drawing on quantitative and qualitative methods to determine adherence to, and barrier of adherence to the COVID-19 protocols.

Method

A sample of 283 staff participated in the quantitative study, while in-depth interviews were conducted among management staff across the public and private hospitals. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test to compare differences in adherence and logistic regression model to identify the factors associated with adherence to the COVID-19 protocols.

Results

The regression results showed that adherence to the COVID-19 protocols in public and private hospitals were significantly associated with staff training on adherence in public (OR = 2.08; p < 0.01) and private (OR = 1.44; p < 0.05), and knowledge on adherence in public (OR = 3.12; p < 0.01) and private (OR = 11.45; p < 0.01) hospitals. Adherence to the protocol varied significantly between public and private hospitals (0.001 > p < 0.05), with an effect size ranging from small to large. Clients’ behavioural factors and poor stocking of PPEs due to financial challenges were reported as barriers to adherence in both hospital types.

Conclusion

Adherence to the COVID-19 protocols was more pronounced in public hospitals than private hospitals suggesting the need for interventions targeting the latter to promote client and staff safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health in Practice
Public Health in Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
71 days
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the dispensing of systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) in Ireland: A population based study Association between child marriage and high blood glucose level in women: A birth cohort analysis Reaching national Covid-19 vaccination targets whilst decreasing inequalities in vaccine uptake: Public health teams' challenges in supporting disadvantaged populations Syndemic geographic patterns of cancer risk in a health-deprived area of England Young, deprived women are more at risk of testing positive for Chlamydia trachomatis: Results from a cross-sectional multicentre study in French health examination centres
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1