增强城市和大都市地区对超大型铁路基础设施的需求:SWOT 和因素分析法的应用

IF 3.5 Q3 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Smart and Sustainable Built Environment Pub Date : 2024-01-02 DOI:10.1108/sasbe-02-2023-0044
Emma Mihocic, K. Gharehbaghi, Per Hilletofth, Kong Fah Tee, Matt Myers
{"title":"增强城市和大都市地区对超大型铁路基础设施的需求:SWOT 和因素分析法的应用","authors":"Emma Mihocic, K. Gharehbaghi, Per Hilletofth, Kong Fah Tee, Matt Myers","doi":"10.1108/sasbe-02-2023-0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeIn successfully meeting city and metropolitan growth, sustainable development is compulsory. Sustainability is a must-focus for any project, particularly for large and mega rail infrastructure. This paper aims to investigate to what degree social, environmental and economic factors influence the government when planning sustainable rail infrastructure projects. To respond to such a matter, this paper focuses on two Australian mega-rail projects: the South West Rail Link (SWRL) and the Mernda Rail Extension (MRE).Design/methodology/approachAs the basis of an experimental evaluation framework strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) and factor analysis were used. These two methods were specifically selected as comparative tools for SWRL and SWRL projects, to measure their overall sustainability effect.FindingsUsing factor analysis, in the MRE, the factors of network capacity, accessibility, employment and urban planning were seen frequently throughout the case study. However, politics and economic growth had lower frequencies throughout this case study. This difference between the high-weighted factors is likely a key element that determined the SWRL to be more sustainable than the MRE. The SWOT analysis showed the strengths the MRE had over the SWRL such as resource use and waste management, and natural habitat preservation. These two analyses have shown that overall, calculating the sustainability levels of a project can be subjective, based on the conditions surrounding various analysis techniques.Originality/valueThis paper first introduces SWRL and MRE projects followed by a discussion about their overall sustainable development. Both projects go beyond the traditional megaprojects' goal of improving economic growth by developing and enhancing infrastructure. Globally, for such projects, sustainability measures are now considered alongside the goal of economic growth. Second, SWOT and factor analysis are undertaken to further evaluate the complexity of such projects. This includes their overall sustainable development vision alignment with environmental, economic and social factors.","PeriodicalId":45779,"journal":{"name":"Smart and Sustainable Built Environment","volume":"3 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Augmenting the cities’ and metropolitan regional demands for mega rail infrastructure: the application of SWOT and factor analysis\",\"authors\":\"Emma Mihocic, K. Gharehbaghi, Per Hilletofth, Kong Fah Tee, Matt Myers\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/sasbe-02-2023-0044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeIn successfully meeting city and metropolitan growth, sustainable development is compulsory. Sustainability is a must-focus for any project, particularly for large and mega rail infrastructure. This paper aims to investigate to what degree social, environmental and economic factors influence the government when planning sustainable rail infrastructure projects. To respond to such a matter, this paper focuses on two Australian mega-rail projects: the South West Rail Link (SWRL) and the Mernda Rail Extension (MRE).Design/methodology/approachAs the basis of an experimental evaluation framework strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) and factor analysis were used. These two methods were specifically selected as comparative tools for SWRL and SWRL projects, to measure their overall sustainability effect.FindingsUsing factor analysis, in the MRE, the factors of network capacity, accessibility, employment and urban planning were seen frequently throughout the case study. However, politics and economic growth had lower frequencies throughout this case study. This difference between the high-weighted factors is likely a key element that determined the SWRL to be more sustainable than the MRE. The SWOT analysis showed the strengths the MRE had over the SWRL such as resource use and waste management, and natural habitat preservation. These two analyses have shown that overall, calculating the sustainability levels of a project can be subjective, based on the conditions surrounding various analysis techniques.Originality/valueThis paper first introduces SWRL and MRE projects followed by a discussion about their overall sustainable development. Both projects go beyond the traditional megaprojects' goal of improving economic growth by developing and enhancing infrastructure. Globally, for such projects, sustainability measures are now considered alongside the goal of economic growth. Second, SWOT and factor analysis are undertaken to further evaluate the complexity of such projects. This includes their overall sustainable development vision alignment with environmental, economic and social factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Smart and Sustainable Built Environment\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Smart and Sustainable Built Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-02-2023-0044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart and Sustainable Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-02-2023-0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 要成功地满足城市和大都市的发展,就必须实现可持续发展。可持续发展是任何项目都必须关注的重点,尤其是大型和超大型铁路基础设施。本文旨在研究在规划可持续铁路基础设施项目时,社会、环境和经济因素对政府的影响程度。设计/方法/途径 作为实验评估框架的基础,本文使用了优势、劣势、机会和威胁(SWOT)和因素分析法。这两种方法被特别选作西南铁路线和西南铁路线项目的比较工具,以衡量其整体可持续性效果。研究结果通过因素分析,在 MRE 案例研究中,网络容量、可达性、就业和城市规划等因素经常出现。然而,政治和经济增长在整个案例研究中出现的频率较低。高权重因素之间的这种差异很可能是决定西南铁路线比孟买铁路线更具可持续性的关键因素。SWOT 分析显示了 MRE 相对于 SWRL 的优势,如资源利用、废物管理和自然栖息地保护。这两项分析表明,总体而言,根据各种分析技术的相关条件,计算一个项目的可持续发展水平可能是主观的。这两个项目都超越了传统巨型项目的目标,即通过发展和改善基础设施来提高经济增长。在全球范围内,对于此类项目而言,可持续发展措施现在与经济增长目标并列考虑。其次,通过 SWOT 分析和因素分析,进一步评估此类项目的复杂性。这包括其整体可持续发展愿景与环境、经济和社会因素的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Augmenting the cities’ and metropolitan regional demands for mega rail infrastructure: the application of SWOT and factor analysis
PurposeIn successfully meeting city and metropolitan growth, sustainable development is compulsory. Sustainability is a must-focus for any project, particularly for large and mega rail infrastructure. This paper aims to investigate to what degree social, environmental and economic factors influence the government when planning sustainable rail infrastructure projects. To respond to such a matter, this paper focuses on two Australian mega-rail projects: the South West Rail Link (SWRL) and the Mernda Rail Extension (MRE).Design/methodology/approachAs the basis of an experimental evaluation framework strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) and factor analysis were used. These two methods were specifically selected as comparative tools for SWRL and SWRL projects, to measure their overall sustainability effect.FindingsUsing factor analysis, in the MRE, the factors of network capacity, accessibility, employment and urban planning were seen frequently throughout the case study. However, politics and economic growth had lower frequencies throughout this case study. This difference between the high-weighted factors is likely a key element that determined the SWRL to be more sustainable than the MRE. The SWOT analysis showed the strengths the MRE had over the SWRL such as resource use and waste management, and natural habitat preservation. These two analyses have shown that overall, calculating the sustainability levels of a project can be subjective, based on the conditions surrounding various analysis techniques.Originality/valueThis paper first introduces SWRL and MRE projects followed by a discussion about their overall sustainable development. Both projects go beyond the traditional megaprojects' goal of improving economic growth by developing and enhancing infrastructure. Globally, for such projects, sustainability measures are now considered alongside the goal of economic growth. Second, SWOT and factor analysis are undertaken to further evaluate the complexity of such projects. This includes their overall sustainable development vision alignment with environmental, economic and social factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Smart personal protective equipment for intelligent construction safety monitoring The smart city conundrum: technology, privacy, and the quest for convenience An exploratory study on the benefits of transit orientated development (TOD) to rail infrastructure projects Augmenting the cities’ and metropolitan regional demands for mega rail infrastructure: the application of SWOT and factor analysis Development of an ontology-based asset information model for predictive maintenance in building facilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1