Dominique Maciejewski, E. van Roekel, Thao Ha, Kalee DeFrance, Lauren Lin, H. Lennarz, Hester Trompetter, Wim Meeus, Anna Lichtwarck-Aschoff, Susan J T Branje, Tom Hollenstein, M. Verhagen
{"title":"主要效应之外?情感水平是情感动力与抑郁症状之间关系的调节因素","authors":"Dominique Maciejewski, E. van Roekel, Thao Ha, Kalee DeFrance, Lauren Lin, H. Lennarz, Hester Trompetter, Wim Meeus, Anna Lichtwarck-Aschoff, Susan J T Branje, Tom Hollenstein, M. Verhagen","doi":"10.55913/joep.v1i1.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study examined the role of mean levels of affect in the relation between affect dynamics and depressive symptoms. We analyzed data from seven studies that measured affect in daily life in adolescents and young adults (N = 1,448, age range = 11.7-29.9 years, 64.8% females). We tested main and interaction effects of affect dynamics (variability and inertia) and affect level on depressive symptoms, separately for positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA). For PA, we found mostly main, but no interaction effects. Depressive symptoms were associated with more PA variability and less PA inertia, indicating that depressive symptoms in young people may be characterized by more variable and less lingering PA, independent of PA mean levels. For NA, we found a significant moderation effect between NA variability and NA levels for depressive symptoms at baseline. For individuals with low NA levels, high NA variability was associated with more depressive symptoms. In contrast, for individuals with high NA levels, high NA variability was associated with fewer depressive symptoms. These results suggest that the relative adaptiveness of NA variability depends on overall NA levels and underscores the need for a more nuanced understanding of affect variability in depression.","PeriodicalId":73729,"journal":{"name":"Journal of emotion and psychopathology","volume":"121 43","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Main Effects? Affect Level as a Moderator in the Relation Between Affect Dynamics and Depressive Symptoms\",\"authors\":\"Dominique Maciejewski, E. van Roekel, Thao Ha, Kalee DeFrance, Lauren Lin, H. Lennarz, Hester Trompetter, Wim Meeus, Anna Lichtwarck-Aschoff, Susan J T Branje, Tom Hollenstein, M. Verhagen\",\"doi\":\"10.55913/joep.v1i1.52\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current study examined the role of mean levels of affect in the relation between affect dynamics and depressive symptoms. We analyzed data from seven studies that measured affect in daily life in adolescents and young adults (N = 1,448, age range = 11.7-29.9 years, 64.8% females). We tested main and interaction effects of affect dynamics (variability and inertia) and affect level on depressive symptoms, separately for positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA). For PA, we found mostly main, but no interaction effects. Depressive symptoms were associated with more PA variability and less PA inertia, indicating that depressive symptoms in young people may be characterized by more variable and less lingering PA, independent of PA mean levels. For NA, we found a significant moderation effect between NA variability and NA levels for depressive symptoms at baseline. For individuals with low NA levels, high NA variability was associated with more depressive symptoms. In contrast, for individuals with high NA levels, high NA variability was associated with fewer depressive symptoms. These results suggest that the relative adaptiveness of NA variability depends on overall NA levels and underscores the need for a more nuanced understanding of affect variability in depression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of emotion and psychopathology\",\"volume\":\"121 43\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of emotion and psychopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55913/joep.v1i1.52\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of emotion and psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55913/joep.v1i1.52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究探讨了情感的平均水平在情感动态与抑郁症状之间关系中的作用。我们分析了七项研究的数据,这些研究测量了青少年和年轻成年人(人数 = 1,448 人,年龄范围 = 11.7-29.9 岁,64.8% 为女性)日常生活中的情感。我们分别就积极情感(PA)和消极情感(NA)测试了情感动态(可变性和惯性)和情感水平对抑郁症状的主要效应和交互效应。对于积极情感,我们发现主要是主效应,但没有交互效应。抑郁症状与较高的 PA 变异性和较低的 PA 惯性相关,这表明年轻人的抑郁症状可能表现为较高的 PA 变异性和较低的 PA 惯性,与 PA 平均水平无关。在 NA 方面,我们发现 NA 变异性和 NA 水平对基线抑郁症状有显著的调节作用。对于 NA 水平较低的人来说,NA 变异性高与抑郁症状较多有关。相反,对于 NA 水平高的人,NA 变异性高则抑郁症状较少。这些结果表明,NA变异性的相对适应性取决于整体的NA水平,并强调了对抑郁症中情感变异性进行更细致理解的必要性。
Beyond Main Effects? Affect Level as a Moderator in the Relation Between Affect Dynamics and Depressive Symptoms
The current study examined the role of mean levels of affect in the relation between affect dynamics and depressive symptoms. We analyzed data from seven studies that measured affect in daily life in adolescents and young adults (N = 1,448, age range = 11.7-29.9 years, 64.8% females). We tested main and interaction effects of affect dynamics (variability and inertia) and affect level on depressive symptoms, separately for positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA). For PA, we found mostly main, but no interaction effects. Depressive symptoms were associated with more PA variability and less PA inertia, indicating that depressive symptoms in young people may be characterized by more variable and less lingering PA, independent of PA mean levels. For NA, we found a significant moderation effect between NA variability and NA levels for depressive symptoms at baseline. For individuals with low NA levels, high NA variability was associated with more depressive symptoms. In contrast, for individuals with high NA levels, high NA variability was associated with fewer depressive symptoms. These results suggest that the relative adaptiveness of NA variability depends on overall NA levels and underscores the need for a more nuanced understanding of affect variability in depression.