通过取消腿部驱动统一卧推,促进体育运动的包容性

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Physical Education of Students Pub Date : 2023-12-31 DOI:10.15561/20755279.2023.0603
T. D’Isanto, F. D’Elia, S. Aliberti, Felice Di Domenico, Giovanni Esposito
{"title":"通过取消腿部驱动统一卧推,促进体育运动的包容性","authors":"T. D’Isanto, F. D’Elia, S. Aliberti, Felice Di Domenico, Giovanni Esposito","doi":"10.15561/20755279.2023.0603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Study Aim. Among the weightlifting disciplines we find the bench press in Powerlifting and Para Powerlifting, which are very similar. They have never been combined for several reasons, the most important of which is the use of two different barbell lifting techniques. Unlike Para Powerlifting, Powerlifting in the bench press involves the use of leg-drive, i.e. leg thrust, which is considered one of the possible determining factors for the success of this exercise. The aim of the study was to test whether the elimination of the leg-drive technique in Powerlifting, followed by a protocol of adapting to the Para Powerlifting technique, without leg-drive, made a difference in terms of lifting the maximum load (1RM). Material and Methods. The subjects were 10 male amateur athletes (22,3 ± 2,4 years old). The training protocol, administered for 2 weeks, consisted of finding the best possible position on the bench in the absence of leg-drive. The 1RM test with leg-drive and 1RM without leg-drive were administered. A dependent-samples t-test was used to compare the differences in 1RM test using the two techniques. Results. The result was not statistically significant (p >.05), as the maxima with the two techniques remained unchanged. Discussions. Para Powerlifting technique, without leg-drive, in bench press, allows athletes without disabilities to lift the same weights as the leg-drive technique, or slightly less. Conclusions. The results obtained are promising and the study, if extended and focused on high-level athletes with positive results, could open a new page in sport, representing a new step in sport towards inclusion.","PeriodicalId":51897,"journal":{"name":"Physical Education of Students","volume":" 413","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unified bench press through the elimination of leg-drive to promote sports inclusion\",\"authors\":\"T. D’Isanto, F. D’Elia, S. Aliberti, Felice Di Domenico, Giovanni Esposito\",\"doi\":\"10.15561/20755279.2023.0603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Study Aim. Among the weightlifting disciplines we find the bench press in Powerlifting and Para Powerlifting, which are very similar. They have never been combined for several reasons, the most important of which is the use of two different barbell lifting techniques. Unlike Para Powerlifting, Powerlifting in the bench press involves the use of leg-drive, i.e. leg thrust, which is considered one of the possible determining factors for the success of this exercise. The aim of the study was to test whether the elimination of the leg-drive technique in Powerlifting, followed by a protocol of adapting to the Para Powerlifting technique, without leg-drive, made a difference in terms of lifting the maximum load (1RM). Material and Methods. The subjects were 10 male amateur athletes (22,3 ± 2,4 years old). The training protocol, administered for 2 weeks, consisted of finding the best possible position on the bench in the absence of leg-drive. The 1RM test with leg-drive and 1RM without leg-drive were administered. A dependent-samples t-test was used to compare the differences in 1RM test using the two techniques. Results. The result was not statistically significant (p >.05), as the maxima with the two techniques remained unchanged. Discussions. Para Powerlifting technique, without leg-drive, in bench press, allows athletes without disabilities to lift the same weights as the leg-drive technique, or slightly less. Conclusions. The results obtained are promising and the study, if extended and focused on high-level athletes with positive results, could open a new page in sport, representing a new step in sport towards inclusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Education of Students\",\"volume\":\" 413\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Education of Students\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2023.0603\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Education of Students","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2023.0603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和研究目的。在举重项目中,我们发现力量举和残疾人力量举的卧推非常相似。由于多种原因,它们从未合并,其中最重要的原因是使用两种不同的杠铃举重技术。与准举重不同,举重卧推涉及到腿部驱动,即腿部推力,这被认为是这项运动成功与否的决定性因素之一。本研究的目的是测试在力量举中取消腿部驱动技术,然后在不使用腿部驱动的情况下适应准力量举技术的方案是否会在举起最大负荷(1RM)方面产生影响。材料和方法。受试者为 10 名男性业余运动员(22.3 ± 2.4 岁)。训练方案为期两周,包括在没有腿部驱动的情况下在长凳上寻找最佳位置。进行了有腿部驱动的 1RM 测试和无腿部驱动的 1RM 测试。使用因变量样本 t 检验比较两种技术在 1RM 测试中的差异。结果。结果没有统计学意义(P >.05),因为两种技术的最大值保持不变。讨论。无腿驱动的残疾人举重技术在卧推中可以让残疾人运动员举起与腿驱动技术相同的重量,或略低于腿驱动技术。结论。所取得的结果很有希望,如果这项研究能够扩大,并侧重于高水平运动员,并取得积极成果,那么这项研究将为体育运动揭开新的一页,代表着体育运动向全纳迈出了新的一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unified bench press through the elimination of leg-drive to promote sports inclusion
Background and Study Aim. Among the weightlifting disciplines we find the bench press in Powerlifting and Para Powerlifting, which are very similar. They have never been combined for several reasons, the most important of which is the use of two different barbell lifting techniques. Unlike Para Powerlifting, Powerlifting in the bench press involves the use of leg-drive, i.e. leg thrust, which is considered one of the possible determining factors for the success of this exercise. The aim of the study was to test whether the elimination of the leg-drive technique in Powerlifting, followed by a protocol of adapting to the Para Powerlifting technique, without leg-drive, made a difference in terms of lifting the maximum load (1RM). Material and Methods. The subjects were 10 male amateur athletes (22,3 ± 2,4 years old). The training protocol, administered for 2 weeks, consisted of finding the best possible position on the bench in the absence of leg-drive. The 1RM test with leg-drive and 1RM without leg-drive were administered. A dependent-samples t-test was used to compare the differences in 1RM test using the two techniques. Results. The result was not statistically significant (p >.05), as the maxima with the two techniques remained unchanged. Discussions. Para Powerlifting technique, without leg-drive, in bench press, allows athletes without disabilities to lift the same weights as the leg-drive technique, or slightly less. Conclusions. The results obtained are promising and the study, if extended and focused on high-level athletes with positive results, could open a new page in sport, representing a new step in sport towards inclusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Education of Students
Physical Education of Students EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
University students’ physical features- reasons, consequences, solutions Remote versus onsite proctored exams: comparing students’ results in physical fitness testing Acute effects of repeated isoinertial lunges on jump and sprint parameters Sensory integration research: priority scientific directions based on the analysis of Web of Science Core Collection resources 3D kinematic analysis of salto backward in acrobatic rock and roll: a case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1