全球气候:比测量温室气体和碳足迹复杂得多

Wellington Wonsang
{"title":"全球气候:比测量温室气体和碳足迹复杂得多","authors":"Wellington Wonsang","doi":"10.37815/rte.v35n3.1044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the assertion that 97% of climate scientists concur that humans are the primary driver of global warming and climate change, significantly contributing to rising temperatures. The study examines common myths about climate change, the standard arguments against it, and the perspective and solutions offered by representatives from all sides of the debate. While researching this topic, primary and secondary sources are examined by analyzing their content, including interviews and arguments from credible experts within a wide range of sources, from climate change advocates to deniers and \"climate doomers.\" While most climate scientists agree that human activities contribute somewhat to global warming, many highly reputable scientists and groups rightfully challenge this consensus and the proposed data. This includes prominent academics, corporate figures, and respected Nobel Peace Prize laureates and their works. In conclusion, all perspectives are driven by their concern for the future and survival of humanity and our planet.","PeriodicalId":117722,"journal":{"name":"Revista Tecnológica - ESPOL","volume":" 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Climate: Much more complex than measuring Greenhouse Gases and Carbon Footprints\",\"authors\":\"Wellington Wonsang\",\"doi\":\"10.37815/rte.v35n3.1044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes the assertion that 97% of climate scientists concur that humans are the primary driver of global warming and climate change, significantly contributing to rising temperatures. The study examines common myths about climate change, the standard arguments against it, and the perspective and solutions offered by representatives from all sides of the debate. While researching this topic, primary and secondary sources are examined by analyzing their content, including interviews and arguments from credible experts within a wide range of sources, from climate change advocates to deniers and \\\"climate doomers.\\\" While most climate scientists agree that human activities contribute somewhat to global warming, many highly reputable scientists and groups rightfully challenge this consensus and the proposed data. This includes prominent academics, corporate figures, and respected Nobel Peace Prize laureates and their works. In conclusion, all perspectives are driven by their concern for the future and survival of humanity and our planet.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Tecnológica - ESPOL\",\"volume\":\" 38\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Tecnológica - ESPOL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37815/rte.v35n3.1044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Tecnológica - ESPOL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37815/rte.v35n3.1044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

97% 的气候科学家一致认为人类是全球变暖和气候变化的主要驱动力,是导致气温上升的重要原因,本文对这一论断进行了分析。研究探讨了有关气候变化的常见神话、反对气候变化的标准论据以及辩论各方代表提出的观点和解决方案。在研究这一主题时,通过分析主要和次要资料来源的内容,包括从气候变化倡导者到否认者和 "气候末日论者 "等各种来源的可信专家的访谈和论点,对其进行了研究。虽然大多数气候科学家都认为人类活动在一定程度上导致了全球变暖,但许多声誉卓著的科学家和团体也理所当然地对这一共识和提出的数据提出了质疑。这其中包括著名学者、企业界人士和受人尊敬的诺贝尔和平奖获得者及其作品。总之,所有观点都是出于对人类和地球的未来和生存的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Global Climate: Much more complex than measuring Greenhouse Gases and Carbon Footprints
This article analyzes the assertion that 97% of climate scientists concur that humans are the primary driver of global warming and climate change, significantly contributing to rising temperatures. The study examines common myths about climate change, the standard arguments against it, and the perspective and solutions offered by representatives from all sides of the debate. While researching this topic, primary and secondary sources are examined by analyzing their content, including interviews and arguments from credible experts within a wide range of sources, from climate change advocates to deniers and "climate doomers." While most climate scientists agree that human activities contribute somewhat to global warming, many highly reputable scientists and groups rightfully challenge this consensus and the proposed data. This includes prominent academics, corporate figures, and respected Nobel Peace Prize laureates and their works. In conclusion, all perspectives are driven by their concern for the future and survival of humanity and our planet.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Global Climate: Much more complex than measuring Greenhouse Gases and Carbon Footprints Aprender enseñando: la educación intergeneracional a través del aprendizaje-servicio Enfoque multicriterio para la selección óptima de variables explicativas para modelos de pronóstico de la energía eléctrica de plantas solares fotovoltaicas Desarrollo de un modelo predictivo utilizando técnicas de aprendizaje supervisado para detectar la moniliasis en plantas de cacao de la Provincia de Orellana Interdisciplinariedad en la educación superior: conectando universidad y sociedad
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1