对患有先天性阴茎腹侧弯曲和尿道下裂的男孩进行阴茎系带矫正的范围综述

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Indian Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2023-12-29 DOI:10.4103/iju.iju_277_23
Priyank Yadav, A. Bobrowski, Ihtisham Ahmad, J. Kim, Margarita Chancy, Dheidan Alshammari, M. Rickard, A. Lorenzo, Darius J. Bagli, Michael E Chua
{"title":"对患有先天性阴茎腹侧弯曲和尿道下裂的男孩进行阴茎系带矫正的范围综述","authors":"Priyank Yadav, A. Bobrowski, Ihtisham Ahmad, J. Kim, Margarita Chancy, Dheidan Alshammari, M. Rickard, A. Lorenzo, Darius J. Bagli, Michael E Chua","doi":"10.4103/iju.iju_277_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Congenital penile curvature (PC), often concomitant with hypospadias, poses challenges in urology. Surgical correction techniques, including plication and corporotomy, lack standardized guidelines. This study aims to address the paucity of high-level evidence by comprehensively reviewing the outcomes of PC correction procedures in patients with and without hypospadias. This will inform clinical decision-making and provide insights for future research and meta-analyses. We conducted this scoping review in accordance with the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. An extensive literature search was performed and comparative studies published in English up to June 2023 were included. The studies were divided into three categories: PC without hypospadias, PC with hypospadias, and studies comparing two or more materials for covering the ventral corporotomy. Data extraction comprised author details, patient characteristics, study design, interventions, outcomes, and complications. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Forty-two studies were included in the review, which collectively comprised 3180 patients. Thirteen comparative studies reported the outcomes of surgery for congenital PC without hypospadias, 22 studies compared different techniques of PC correction in patients with hypospadias and 7 studies compared the type of materials for coverage following ventral corporotomy. In cases of PC without hypospadias, the most commonly reported surgery was the Nesbit’s plication. For PC with hypospadias correction, the results of ventral corporotomy were superior to that of dorsal plication in most of the studies. The two-stage repair had better results when compared to the one-stage repair for patients with perineo-scrotal hypospadias. In studies comparing materials for coverage of ventral corporotomy, the tunica vaginalis flap or graft was utilized most commonly. The majority of the studies reported a success rate ranging from 85% to 100%. The methodological quality was high in all but four studies. Plication procedures are generally preferred for PC without hypospadias, but they result in penile shortening. For those with hypospadias, corporotomy is associated with superior outcomes than plication, especially for those with severe curvature and redo procedures. For ventral corporotomy coverage, the tunica vaginalis flap or graft is the most commonly reported tissue in the literature.","PeriodicalId":47352,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoping review on chordee correction in boys with ventral congenital penile curvature and hypospadias\",\"authors\":\"Priyank Yadav, A. Bobrowski, Ihtisham Ahmad, J. Kim, Margarita Chancy, Dheidan Alshammari, M. Rickard, A. Lorenzo, Darius J. Bagli, Michael E Chua\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/iju.iju_277_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Congenital penile curvature (PC), often concomitant with hypospadias, poses challenges in urology. Surgical correction techniques, including plication and corporotomy, lack standardized guidelines. This study aims to address the paucity of high-level evidence by comprehensively reviewing the outcomes of PC correction procedures in patients with and without hypospadias. This will inform clinical decision-making and provide insights for future research and meta-analyses. We conducted this scoping review in accordance with the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. An extensive literature search was performed and comparative studies published in English up to June 2023 were included. The studies were divided into three categories: PC without hypospadias, PC with hypospadias, and studies comparing two or more materials for covering the ventral corporotomy. Data extraction comprised author details, patient characteristics, study design, interventions, outcomes, and complications. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Forty-two studies were included in the review, which collectively comprised 3180 patients. Thirteen comparative studies reported the outcomes of surgery for congenital PC without hypospadias, 22 studies compared different techniques of PC correction in patients with hypospadias and 7 studies compared the type of materials for coverage following ventral corporotomy. In cases of PC without hypospadias, the most commonly reported surgery was the Nesbit’s plication. For PC with hypospadias correction, the results of ventral corporotomy were superior to that of dorsal plication in most of the studies. The two-stage repair had better results when compared to the one-stage repair for patients with perineo-scrotal hypospadias. In studies comparing materials for coverage of ventral corporotomy, the tunica vaginalis flap or graft was utilized most commonly. The majority of the studies reported a success rate ranging from 85% to 100%. The methodological quality was high in all but four studies. Plication procedures are generally preferred for PC without hypospadias, but they result in penile shortening. For those with hypospadias, corporotomy is associated with superior outcomes than plication, especially for those with severe curvature and redo procedures. For ventral corporotomy coverage, the tunica vaginalis flap or graft is the most commonly reported tissue in the literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_277_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_277_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先天性阴茎弯曲(PC)通常与尿道下裂同时存在,给泌尿外科带来了挑战。包括阴茎电切术和阴茎体切开术在内的手术矫正技术缺乏标准化指南。本研究旨在通过全面回顾尿道下裂患者和非尿道下裂患者PC矫正术的结果,解决缺乏高级别证据的问题。这将为临床决策提供依据,并为未来的研究和荟萃分析提供启示。 我们根据《JBI 证据合成手册》和 PRISMA-ScR 指南进行了此次范围界定综述。我们进行了广泛的文献检索,并纳入了截至 2023 年 6 月用英语发表的比较研究。研究分为三类:不伴有尿道下裂的 PC、伴有尿道下裂的 PC,以及比较两种或两种以上覆盖腹股沟切口材料的研究。数据提取包括作者详细信息、患者特征、研究设计、干预措施、结果和并发症。方法学质量采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。 共有 42 项研究被纳入综述,其中包括 3180 名患者。其中 13 项比较研究报告了无尿道下裂的先天性 PC 手术的结果,22 项研究比较了尿道下裂患者 PC 矫正的不同技术,7 项研究比较了腹侧体部切开术后覆盖材料的类型。在无尿道下裂的 PC 病例中,最常报道的手术方法是内斯比特切开术(Nesbit's plication)。对于尿道下裂矫正的 PC,在大多数研究中,腹侧结肠切除术的效果优于背侧切开术。对于阴囊周围尿道下裂患者,两阶段修复术的效果优于单阶段修复术。在比较覆盖腹侧阴茎体切开术的材料的研究中,阴道韧带瓣或阴道韧带移植是最常用的方法。大多数研究报告的成功率在 85% 到 100% 之间。除四项研究外,其他研究的方法学质量都很高。 对于无尿道下裂的 PC 来说,通常首选切开术,但这种手术会导致阴茎缩短。对于尿道下裂患者,阴茎体部切开术的疗效优于阴茎折叠术,尤其是对于阴茎严重弯曲和重做手术的患者。对于腹侧阴茎体部切除术的覆盖,阴道韧带皮瓣或移植组织是文献中最常报道的组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A scoping review on chordee correction in boys with ventral congenital penile curvature and hypospadias
Congenital penile curvature (PC), often concomitant with hypospadias, poses challenges in urology. Surgical correction techniques, including plication and corporotomy, lack standardized guidelines. This study aims to address the paucity of high-level evidence by comprehensively reviewing the outcomes of PC correction procedures in patients with and without hypospadias. This will inform clinical decision-making and provide insights for future research and meta-analyses. We conducted this scoping review in accordance with the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. An extensive literature search was performed and comparative studies published in English up to June 2023 were included. The studies were divided into three categories: PC without hypospadias, PC with hypospadias, and studies comparing two or more materials for covering the ventral corporotomy. Data extraction comprised author details, patient characteristics, study design, interventions, outcomes, and complications. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Forty-two studies were included in the review, which collectively comprised 3180 patients. Thirteen comparative studies reported the outcomes of surgery for congenital PC without hypospadias, 22 studies compared different techniques of PC correction in patients with hypospadias and 7 studies compared the type of materials for coverage following ventral corporotomy. In cases of PC without hypospadias, the most commonly reported surgery was the Nesbit’s plication. For PC with hypospadias correction, the results of ventral corporotomy were superior to that of dorsal plication in most of the studies. The two-stage repair had better results when compared to the one-stage repair for patients with perineo-scrotal hypospadias. In studies comparing materials for coverage of ventral corporotomy, the tunica vaginalis flap or graft was utilized most commonly. The majority of the studies reported a success rate ranging from 85% to 100%. The methodological quality was high in all but four studies. Plication procedures are generally preferred for PC without hypospadias, but they result in penile shortening. For those with hypospadias, corporotomy is associated with superior outcomes than plication, especially for those with severe curvature and redo procedures. For ventral corporotomy coverage, the tunica vaginalis flap or graft is the most commonly reported tissue in the literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Urology
Indian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Urology-IJU (ISSN 0970-1591) is official publication of the Urological Society of India. The journal is published Quarterly. Bibliographic listings: The journal is indexed with Abstracts on Hygiene and Communicable Diseases, CAB Abstracts, Caspur, DOAJ, EBSCO Publishing’s Electronic Databases, Excerpta Medica / EMBASE, Expanded Academic ASAP, Genamics JournalSeek, Global Health, Google Scholar, Health & Wellness Research Center, Health Reference Center Academic, Hinari, Index Copernicus, IndMed, OpenJGate, PubMed, Pubmed Central, Scimago Journal Ranking, SCOLOAR, SCOPUS, SIIC databases, SNEMB, Tropical Diseases Bulletin, Ulrich’s International Periodical Directory
期刊最新文献
The prognostic role of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in upper tract urothelial carcinoma Combination therapy for advanced urothelial cancer: LEAP-011 trial Re: Vasudeva P, Kumar V, Yadav S, Prasad V, Kumar N, Kumar S, et al. Urodynamic assessment of detrusor function in the very acute phase of traumatic spinal cord injury: A prospective cohort study. Indian J Urol 2024;40:31-6 The cost-effectiveness of reusable flexible ureteroscopes: An institutional audit Round Up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1