{"title":"Sciadocladus (翼手目,毛叶植物纲)的物种划分","authors":"Diego SÁNCHEZ-GANFORNINA, Neil E. Bell","doi":"10.11646/bde.46.1.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sciadocladus is a distinctive genus of large dendroid mosses restricted to New Zealand, New Caledonia and the Solomon Islands. Of the two extant species, S. kerrii is endemic to New Zealand, while S. menziesii is found in New Zealand, New Caledonia and the Solomon Islands. Populations of S. menziesii from New Caledonia and the Solomons have been recognised as subspecies splendidum, distinct from the New Zealand populations. Given the geographical isolation of the two subspecies of S. menziesii, we hypothesised that the endemic S. kerrii could have arisen in situ in New Zealand through speciation from S. menziesii subsp. menziesii. This would make these two taxa more closely related to each other than S. menziesii subsp. menziesii is to S. menziesii subsp. splendidum, challenging the species concept of S. menziesii. We tested this hypothesis by conducting a phylogenetic analysis of molecular data from multiple exemplars of Sciadocladus, including material from both New Zealand and New Caledonia. The results show all specimens of S. menziesii strongly supported as monophyletic, sister to a clade comprising S. kerrii specimens, thus rejecting the hypothesis and corroborating the established taxonomy. Implications for interpretation of the phylogeographic history of the genus are discussed.","PeriodicalId":93270,"journal":{"name":"Bryophyte diversity and evolution","volume":"27 40","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Species Delimitation in Sciadocladus (Pterobryellaceae, Bryophyta)\",\"authors\":\"Diego SÁNCHEZ-GANFORNINA, Neil E. Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.11646/bde.46.1.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sciadocladus is a distinctive genus of large dendroid mosses restricted to New Zealand, New Caledonia and the Solomon Islands. Of the two extant species, S. kerrii is endemic to New Zealand, while S. menziesii is found in New Zealand, New Caledonia and the Solomon Islands. Populations of S. menziesii from New Caledonia and the Solomons have been recognised as subspecies splendidum, distinct from the New Zealand populations. Given the geographical isolation of the two subspecies of S. menziesii, we hypothesised that the endemic S. kerrii could have arisen in situ in New Zealand through speciation from S. menziesii subsp. menziesii. This would make these two taxa more closely related to each other than S. menziesii subsp. menziesii is to S. menziesii subsp. splendidum, challenging the species concept of S. menziesii. We tested this hypothesis by conducting a phylogenetic analysis of molecular data from multiple exemplars of Sciadocladus, including material from both New Zealand and New Caledonia. The results show all specimens of S. menziesii strongly supported as monophyletic, sister to a clade comprising S. kerrii specimens, thus rejecting the hypothesis and corroborating the established taxonomy. Implications for interpretation of the phylogeographic history of the genus are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bryophyte diversity and evolution\",\"volume\":\"27 40\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bryophyte diversity and evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11646/bde.46.1.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bryophyte diversity and evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11646/bde.46.1.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Sciadocladus是仅限于新西兰、新喀里多尼亚和所罗门群岛生长的一种独特的大型树枝苔藓属。在现存的两个物种中,S. kerrii 是新西兰的特有种,而 S. menziesii 则分布于新西兰、新喀里多尼亚和所罗门群岛。新喀里多尼亚和所罗门群岛的 S. menziesii 种群被认定为绚丽亚种,与新西兰种群不同。 鉴于S. menziesii的两个亚种在地理上的隔离性,我们推测新西兰特有的S. kerrii可能是由S. menziesii亚种在原地变异而来。这将使这两个分类群之间的亲缘关系比S. menziesii亚种与S. menziesii亚种之间的亲缘关系更为密切,从而对S. menziesii的物种概念提出了挑战。我们对来自多个 Sciadocladus 样本(包括新西兰和新喀里多尼亚的材料)的分子数据进行了系统发育分析,从而验证了这一假设。结果表明,S. menziesii的所有标本都被强烈支持为单系,是由S. kerrii标本组成的支系的姐妹群,从而否定了这一假说,并证实了已确立的分类法。讨论了对该属系统地理历史的解释的影响。
Species Delimitation in Sciadocladus (Pterobryellaceae, Bryophyta)
Sciadocladus is a distinctive genus of large dendroid mosses restricted to New Zealand, New Caledonia and the Solomon Islands. Of the two extant species, S. kerrii is endemic to New Zealand, while S. menziesii is found in New Zealand, New Caledonia and the Solomon Islands. Populations of S. menziesii from New Caledonia and the Solomons have been recognised as subspecies splendidum, distinct from the New Zealand populations. Given the geographical isolation of the two subspecies of S. menziesii, we hypothesised that the endemic S. kerrii could have arisen in situ in New Zealand through speciation from S. menziesii subsp. menziesii. This would make these two taxa more closely related to each other than S. menziesii subsp. menziesii is to S. menziesii subsp. splendidum, challenging the species concept of S. menziesii. We tested this hypothesis by conducting a phylogenetic analysis of molecular data from multiple exemplars of Sciadocladus, including material from both New Zealand and New Caledonia. The results show all specimens of S. menziesii strongly supported as monophyletic, sister to a clade comprising S. kerrii specimens, thus rejecting the hypothesis and corroborating the established taxonomy. Implications for interpretation of the phylogeographic history of the genus are discussed.