人种厌食症》(Ethno-Apophasis):瘦削与拒绝的人种学神学

Q2 Arts and Humanities Ecclesial Practices Pub Date : 2023-12-28 DOI:10.1163/22144471-bja10050
Elisha Chi
{"title":"人种厌食症》(Ethno-Apophasis):瘦削与拒绝的人种学神学","authors":"Elisha Chi","doi":"10.1163/22144471-bja10050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The critical onboarding of ethnography evinced by scholars in theology, religious studies and Christian ethics compellingly generates ecclesiologies and other theologies inclusive of non-academic life. Yet, in a critical reflection on methodologies in ecclesiological research, this paper questions the growing predominance of ethnography, specifically ethnographic thickness. Drawing upon the work of anthropologist Audra Simpson, this paper argues that the ethnographic turn in religious ethics and theology and religious studies misses (at best) or ignores (at worst) the epistemological violence lurking at the root of this method. By looking into practices of ethnographic thinness and refusal, this paper highlights apophasis as the best theological grounding for scholars engaging with ethnography. Ethnographic apophasis requires practitioners to heed the colonial and settler colonial realities inherent in the method of ethnography itself; ethically pushing notions of solidarity into anticolonial practice.","PeriodicalId":37169,"journal":{"name":"Ecclesial Practices","volume":"36 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethno-Apophasis: An Ethnographic Theology of Thinness and Refusal\",\"authors\":\"Elisha Chi\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22144471-bja10050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The critical onboarding of ethnography evinced by scholars in theology, religious studies and Christian ethics compellingly generates ecclesiologies and other theologies inclusive of non-academic life. Yet, in a critical reflection on methodologies in ecclesiological research, this paper questions the growing predominance of ethnography, specifically ethnographic thickness. Drawing upon the work of anthropologist Audra Simpson, this paper argues that the ethnographic turn in religious ethics and theology and religious studies misses (at best) or ignores (at worst) the epistemological violence lurking at the root of this method. By looking into practices of ethnographic thinness and refusal, this paper highlights apophasis as the best theological grounding for scholars engaging with ethnography. Ethnographic apophasis requires practitioners to heed the colonial and settler colonial realities inherent in the method of ethnography itself; ethically pushing notions of solidarity into anticolonial practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecclesial Practices\",\"volume\":\"36 22\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecclesial Practices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22144471-bja10050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecclesial Practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22144471-bja10050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神学、宗教研究和基督教伦理学领域的学者们对民族志的批判性研究令人信服地产生了教会学和其他包含非学术生活的神学。然而,在对教会学研究方法的批判性反思中,本文对民族志(特别是民族志的厚度)日益占主导地位提出了质疑。本文借鉴人类学家奥德拉-辛普森(Audra Simpson)的研究成果,认为宗教伦理学、神学和宗教研究中的民族志转向(往好的方面说)忽略了(往坏的方面说)潜伏在这种方法根源中的认识论暴力。通过研究民族志的稀薄性和拒绝性实践,本文强调apophasis是学者从事民族志研究的最佳神学基础。民族志的疏离要求实践者关注民族志方法本身所固有的殖民和殖民定居现实;在伦理上将团结的概念推向反殖民实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ethno-Apophasis: An Ethnographic Theology of Thinness and Refusal
The critical onboarding of ethnography evinced by scholars in theology, religious studies and Christian ethics compellingly generates ecclesiologies and other theologies inclusive of non-academic life. Yet, in a critical reflection on methodologies in ecclesiological research, this paper questions the growing predominance of ethnography, specifically ethnographic thickness. Drawing upon the work of anthropologist Audra Simpson, this paper argues that the ethnographic turn in religious ethics and theology and religious studies misses (at best) or ignores (at worst) the epistemological violence lurking at the root of this method. By looking into practices of ethnographic thinness and refusal, this paper highlights apophasis as the best theological grounding for scholars engaging with ethnography. Ethnographic apophasis requires practitioners to heed the colonial and settler colonial realities inherent in the method of ethnography itself; ethically pushing notions of solidarity into anticolonial practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecclesial Practices
Ecclesial Practices Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Is Qualitative Research the Best or Only Way to Study Lived Theology? ‘Give the Grant Money to the Youth’: From Youth Departure to Belonging in the Ethnic Church Practicing Reflexivity at the American Academy of Religion Qualitative Research in Theology. A Spiritual Turn? Ethno-Apophasis: An Ethnographic Theology of Thinness and Refusal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1