使用人工智能系统处理个人数据时的解释权

Ria Papadimitriou
{"title":"使用人工智能系统处理个人数据时的解释权","authors":"Ria Papadimitriou","doi":"10.54934/ijlcw.v2i2.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transparency is one of the basic principles enshrined in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDRP). Achieving transparency in automated decision-making processing especially when artificial intelligence (AI) is involved is a challenging task on many aspects. The opaqueness of AI systems that usually is referred as the “black-box” phenomenon is the main problem in having explainable and accountable AI. Computer scientists are working on explainable AI (XAI) technics in order to make AI more trustworthy. On the same vein, thus from a different perspective, the European legislator provides in the GDPR with aright to information when automated decision-making processing takes place. The data subject has the right to be informed on the logic involved and to challenge the automated decision-making. GDPR introduces, therefore, sui generisright to explanation in automated decision-making process. Under this light, the paper analyzes the legal basis of this right and the technical barriers involved.","PeriodicalId":212137,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law in Changing World","volume":"80 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE RIGHT TO EXPLANATION IN THE PROCESSING OF PERSONAL DATA WITH THE USE OF AI SYSTEMS\",\"authors\":\"Ria Papadimitriou\",\"doi\":\"10.54934/ijlcw.v2i2.53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Transparency is one of the basic principles enshrined in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDRP). Achieving transparency in automated decision-making processing especially when artificial intelligence (AI) is involved is a challenging task on many aspects. The opaqueness of AI systems that usually is referred as the “black-box” phenomenon is the main problem in having explainable and accountable AI. Computer scientists are working on explainable AI (XAI) technics in order to make AI more trustworthy. On the same vein, thus from a different perspective, the European legislator provides in the GDPR with aright to information when automated decision-making processing takes place. The data subject has the right to be informed on the logic involved and to challenge the automated decision-making. GDPR introduces, therefore, sui generisright to explanation in automated decision-making process. Under this light, the paper analyzes the legal basis of this right and the technical barriers involved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Law in Changing World\",\"volume\":\"80 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Law in Changing World\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54934/ijlcw.v2i2.53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law in Changing World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54934/ijlcw.v2i2.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

透明度是《一般数据保护条例》(GDRP)规定的基本原则之一。实现自动化决策处理的透明度,尤其是在涉及人工智能(AI)的情况下,在许多方面都是一项具有挑战性的任务。人工智能系统的不透明性(通常被称为 "黑箱 "现象)是可解释和可问责人工智能的主要问题。计算机科学家们正在研究可解释的人工智能(XAI)技术,以提高人工智能的可信度。同样,从另一个角度来看,欧洲立法者在 GDPR 中规定了自动决策处理时的知情权。数据主体有权了解相关逻辑,并对自动决策提出质疑。因此,GDPR 在自动决策过程中引入了自成一类的解释权。在此背景下,本文分析了这一权利的法律依据以及所涉及的技术障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE RIGHT TO EXPLANATION IN THE PROCESSING OF PERSONAL DATA WITH THE USE OF AI SYSTEMS
Transparency is one of the basic principles enshrined in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDRP). Achieving transparency in automated decision-making processing especially when artificial intelligence (AI) is involved is a challenging task on many aspects. The opaqueness of AI systems that usually is referred as the “black-box” phenomenon is the main problem in having explainable and accountable AI. Computer scientists are working on explainable AI (XAI) technics in order to make AI more trustworthy. On the same vein, thus from a different perspective, the European legislator provides in the GDPR with aright to information when automated decision-making processing takes place. The data subject has the right to be informed on the logic involved and to challenge the automated decision-making. GDPR introduces, therefore, sui generisright to explanation in automated decision-making process. Under this light, the paper analyzes the legal basis of this right and the technical barriers involved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY: PERSPECTIVE OF THE GLOBAL SOUTH EMPLOYMENT IMPLICATIONS FOR NATURALIZED SOUTH AFRICAN CITIZENS Introduction to the Second Issue of 2023 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ITS ROLE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FUTURE OF ARBITRATION THE HUMAN RIGHT TO SAFE DRINKING WATER:A STUDY OF THE PROSPECTS FOR THE ACCESSION OF ARAB COUNTRIES TO THE 1992 WATER CONVENTION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1