斯塔克尔伯格博弈视角下考虑用户响应意愿的电动汽车集成商充放电补偿定价策略

IF 2.4 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC IET Smart Grid Pub Date : 2023-12-27 DOI:10.1049/stg2.12148
Xiaohong Dong, Xiangyu Wei, Guoqiang Zu, Yang Ma, Xiaodan Yu, Yunfei Mu
{"title":"斯塔克尔伯格博弈视角下考虑用户响应意愿的电动汽车集成商充放电补偿定价策略","authors":"Xiaohong Dong,&nbsp;Xiangyu Wei,&nbsp;Guoqiang Zu,&nbsp;Yang Ma,&nbsp;Xiaodan Yu,&nbsp;Yunfei Mu","doi":"10.1049/stg2.12148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the rapid increase of electric vehicle (EV) ownership, the impact of EV charging load on the power grid is becoming more and more prominent. To reasonably guide EV charging/discharging to participate in Demand Response (DR) and help the power grid achieve peak cutting and valley filling, the charge-discharge compensation pricing strategy of EV Aggregator (EVA) considering user response willingness from the perspective of Stackelberg game is proposed. Firstly, EVA, as the leader, provides charge-discharge compensation price, to maximise its income within a day, taking into account user satisfaction constraints. Secondly, a user response willingness model is established. User engagement is used to describe the change in the number of EV responses with the change of the charge-discharge compensation price by EVA and select the random EV set that accepts EVA charge-discharge guidance. Finally, EV, as a follower, conducts charging/discharging behaviour to minimise the charging cost. By using the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) condition, strong duality theory and iterative method, the strategy equilibrium solution is solved. The results show that considering the user response willingness can effectively reduce the decision risk when EVA participates in bidding. Although EVA income slightly decreases considering the response willingness, the average user satisfaction increases by 0.1.</p>","PeriodicalId":36490,"journal":{"name":"IET Smart Grid","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/stg2.12148","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The charge-discharge compensation pricing strategy of electric vehicle aggregator considering users response willingness from the perspective of Stackelberg game\",\"authors\":\"Xiaohong Dong,&nbsp;Xiangyu Wei,&nbsp;Guoqiang Zu,&nbsp;Yang Ma,&nbsp;Xiaodan Yu,&nbsp;Yunfei Mu\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/stg2.12148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>With the rapid increase of electric vehicle (EV) ownership, the impact of EV charging load on the power grid is becoming more and more prominent. To reasonably guide EV charging/discharging to participate in Demand Response (DR) and help the power grid achieve peak cutting and valley filling, the charge-discharge compensation pricing strategy of EV Aggregator (EVA) considering user response willingness from the perspective of Stackelberg game is proposed. Firstly, EVA, as the leader, provides charge-discharge compensation price, to maximise its income within a day, taking into account user satisfaction constraints. Secondly, a user response willingness model is established. User engagement is used to describe the change in the number of EV responses with the change of the charge-discharge compensation price by EVA and select the random EV set that accepts EVA charge-discharge guidance. Finally, EV, as a follower, conducts charging/discharging behaviour to minimise the charging cost. By using the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) condition, strong duality theory and iterative method, the strategy equilibrium solution is solved. The results show that considering the user response willingness can effectively reduce the decision risk when EVA participates in bidding. Although EVA income slightly decreases considering the response willingness, the average user satisfaction increases by 0.1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IET Smart Grid\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/stg2.12148\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IET Smart Grid\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/stg2.12148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Smart Grid","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/stg2.12148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着电动汽车(EV)保有量的快速增长,电动汽车充电负荷对电网的影响日益突出。为合理引导电动汽车充放电参与需求响应(DR),帮助电网实现削峰填谷,本文从 Stackelberg 博弈的角度提出了考虑用户响应意愿的电动汽车汇集器(EVA)充放电补偿定价策略。首先,EVA 作为领导者,提供充放电补偿价格,在考虑用户满意度约束的情况下,使其一天内的收入最大化。其次,建立用户响应意愿模型。用户参与度用于描述电动汽车响应数量随 EVA 充放电补偿价格变化而变化的情况,并选择接受 EVA 充放电指导的随机电动汽车集。最后,电动汽车作为跟随者,进行充电/放电行为,使充电成本最小化。利用卡鲁什-库恩-塔克(KKT)条件、强对偶理论和迭代法,求解了策略均衡解。结果表明,考虑用户响应意愿可以有效降低 EVA 参与竞价时的决策风险。虽然考虑响应意愿后 EVA 收入略有下降,但用户平均满意度却提高了 0.1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The charge-discharge compensation pricing strategy of electric vehicle aggregator considering users response willingness from the perspective of Stackelberg game

With the rapid increase of electric vehicle (EV) ownership, the impact of EV charging load on the power grid is becoming more and more prominent. To reasonably guide EV charging/discharging to participate in Demand Response (DR) and help the power grid achieve peak cutting and valley filling, the charge-discharge compensation pricing strategy of EV Aggregator (EVA) considering user response willingness from the perspective of Stackelberg game is proposed. Firstly, EVA, as the leader, provides charge-discharge compensation price, to maximise its income within a day, taking into account user satisfaction constraints. Secondly, a user response willingness model is established. User engagement is used to describe the change in the number of EV responses with the change of the charge-discharge compensation price by EVA and select the random EV set that accepts EVA charge-discharge guidance. Finally, EV, as a follower, conducts charging/discharging behaviour to minimise the charging cost. By using the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) condition, strong duality theory and iterative method, the strategy equilibrium solution is solved. The results show that considering the user response willingness can effectively reduce the decision risk when EVA participates in bidding. Although EVA income slightly decreases considering the response willingness, the average user satisfaction increases by 0.1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IET Smart Grid
IET Smart Grid Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
41
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
Multi‐objective interval planning for 5G base station virtual power plants considering the consumption of photovoltaic and communication flexibility Probabilistic assessment of short‐term voltage stability under load and wind uncertainty Review on reliability assessment of energy storage systems Coordinated recovery of interdependent power and water distribution systems Incentivising peers in local transactive energy markets: A case study for consumers, prosumers and prosumagers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1