在文件上和作为文件

Q4 Engineering Spool Pub Date : 2023-12-24 DOI:10.47982/spool.2023.1.02
Heidi Svenningsen Kajita, Katie Lloyd Thomas
{"title":"在文件上和作为文件","authors":"Heidi Svenningsen Kajita, Katie Lloyd Thomas","doi":"10.47982/spool.2023.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we piece together threads of communicative processes between residents, architects, and other parties, as found in the lists and letters of the archive of the Byker Redevelopment in Newcastle Upon Tyne (1968-83). Documents that are usually discarded or neglected by architectural researchers - from a stack of various papers documenting residents’ lists of complaints, evaluative papers such as an audit report, and architects’ memos, to a resident’s letter of complaint - enable us to reconstruct, first, how a mainstream practice collected and filed residents’ experiences and understanding of their homes, and second, how, through the circulation of those papers in action as files, residents’ notes were also embedded in the design process.","PeriodicalId":52253,"journal":{"name":"Spool","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On File and As Files\",\"authors\":\"Heidi Svenningsen Kajita, Katie Lloyd Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.47982/spool.2023.1.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we piece together threads of communicative processes between residents, architects, and other parties, as found in the lists and letters of the archive of the Byker Redevelopment in Newcastle Upon Tyne (1968-83). Documents that are usually discarded or neglected by architectural researchers - from a stack of various papers documenting residents’ lists of complaints, evaluative papers such as an audit report, and architects’ memos, to a resident’s letter of complaint - enable us to reconstruct, first, how a mainstream practice collected and filed residents’ experiences and understanding of their homes, and second, how, through the circulation of those papers in action as files, residents’ notes were also embedded in the design process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spool\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spool\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47982/spool.2023.1.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spool","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47982/spool.2023.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们将从泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔拜克重建项目(1968-1983 年)档案中的清单和信件中,拼凑出居民、建筑师和其他各方之间沟通过程的线索。这些通常被建筑研究人员丢弃或忽视的文件--从一叠记录居民投诉清单的各种文件、审计报告等评估文件、建筑师备忘录到一封居民投诉信--使我们能够重建:第一,主流实践如何收集和归档居民的经验和对其住宅的理解;第二,通过这些文件作为档案的流通,居民的笔记如何也被嵌入到设计过程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On File and As Files
In this paper, we piece together threads of communicative processes between residents, architects, and other parties, as found in the lists and letters of the archive of the Byker Redevelopment in Newcastle Upon Tyne (1968-83). Documents that are usually discarded or neglected by architectural researchers - from a stack of various papers documenting residents’ lists of complaints, evaluative papers such as an audit report, and architects’ memos, to a resident’s letter of complaint - enable us to reconstruct, first, how a mainstream practice collected and filed residents’ experiences and understanding of their homes, and second, how, through the circulation of those papers in action as files, residents’ notes were also embedded in the design process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spool
Spool Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Advancing Sustainable Approaches in Architecture by Means of Design-to-Robotic-Production In-Situ vs. Prefab 3D Printing Considerations for CO2-free Pop-up Architecture The migrating walls An interactive simulation of control and coordination strategies for swarms of autonomous construction robots Dialogues on Architecture #6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1