参与,避免传播政策被精英俘虏

A. Linares, Maria Soledad Segura
{"title":"参与,避免传播政策被精英俘虏","authors":"A. Linares, Maria Soledad Segura","doi":"10.15847/obsobs17420232260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How did face the participatory state institutions of communication policies created in Argentina, Ecuador, Mexico and Uruguay the capture by political and economic elites? This article answers this question through a comparative approach. The research addresses regulation and its implementation based on the methodological guide provided by the concept of citizen participation. Diversity, implementation, incidence, autonomy and transparency are the axes that organized the analysis that includes qualitative and quantitative information built from documents, specific bibliography and interviews. It concludes that participatory bodies occasionally limited the capture of policies or generated valuable experiences in that search, at least temporarily. However, these entities failed to prevent the capture of the policies by economic and political elites. Therefore, they did not reach enough influence to change the communication system. Despite this, it may list a set of unintended and difficult-to-measure positive results that show the enrichment of democratic and civic practices.","PeriodicalId":149155,"journal":{"name":"Observatorio (OBS*)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participation to avoid elite capture in communication policies\",\"authors\":\"A. Linares, Maria Soledad Segura\",\"doi\":\"10.15847/obsobs17420232260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How did face the participatory state institutions of communication policies created in Argentina, Ecuador, Mexico and Uruguay the capture by political and economic elites? This article answers this question through a comparative approach. The research addresses regulation and its implementation based on the methodological guide provided by the concept of citizen participation. Diversity, implementation, incidence, autonomy and transparency are the axes that organized the analysis that includes qualitative and quantitative information built from documents, specific bibliography and interviews. It concludes that participatory bodies occasionally limited the capture of policies or generated valuable experiences in that search, at least temporarily. However, these entities failed to prevent the capture of the policies by economic and political elites. Therefore, they did not reach enough influence to change the communication system. Despite this, it may list a set of unintended and difficult-to-measure positive results that show the enrichment of democratic and civic practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Observatorio (OBS*)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Observatorio (OBS*)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15847/obsobs17420232260\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Observatorio (OBS*)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15847/obsobs17420232260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿根廷、厄瓜多尔、墨西哥和乌拉圭创建的参与性国家传播政策机构是如何被政治和经济精英俘虏的?本文通过比较的方法回答了这一问题。研究以公民参与概念提供的方法论为指导,探讨了监管及其实施问题。多样性、实施、发生率、自主性和透明度是组织分析的轴心,其中包括从文件、特定书目和访谈中获得的定性和定量信息。 分析得出的结论是,参与性机构偶尔会限制政策的实施,或在探索过程中产生有价值的经验,至少是暂时的。然而,这些机构未能阻止经济和政治精英攫取政策。因此,它们的影响力不足以改变传播系统。尽管如此,它可能会列出一系列意想不到的、难以衡量的积极成果,表明民主和公民实践得到了丰富。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Participation to avoid elite capture in communication policies
How did face the participatory state institutions of communication policies created in Argentina, Ecuador, Mexico and Uruguay the capture by political and economic elites? This article answers this question through a comparative approach. The research addresses regulation and its implementation based on the methodological guide provided by the concept of citizen participation. Diversity, implementation, incidence, autonomy and transparency are the axes that organized the analysis that includes qualitative and quantitative information built from documents, specific bibliography and interviews. It concludes that participatory bodies occasionally limited the capture of policies or generated valuable experiences in that search, at least temporarily. However, these entities failed to prevent the capture of the policies by economic and political elites. Therefore, they did not reach enough influence to change the communication system. Despite this, it may list a set of unintended and difficult-to-measure positive results that show the enrichment of democratic and civic practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How is Portugal addressing disinformation? Results of a mapping of initiatives (2010-2023) Decoding algorithmic literacy among journalists Perceptions of University Students in Communication about Disinformation: Special Issue (2024) Media Literacy to Tackle Disinformation A taxonomy for Media Literacy in Portugal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1