Marcus Vinícius Amaral Gama Santos, Arthur Arruda Leal Ferreira
{"title":"非殖民化叙事的重要性","authors":"Marcus Vinícius Amaral Gama Santos, Arthur Arruda Leal Ferreira","doi":"10.7146/irtp.v2i1.142793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to discuss the importance of decolonial narratives in general and in the field of history of psychology in particular. For this, we take as the starting point the initial results of a recently published empirical study, which investigated different styles of management within the scope of labor in Rio de Janeiro between 1949 and 1965 through the analysis of publications of the journal Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia. Such results pointed to an inadequacy between the interpretations of the management styles that are used, on the one hand, in the English and North American context and, on the other, in Rio de Janeiro. The discussion of this article focuses on this inadequacy, underlining the differences between how colonial and decolonial narratives conceive the relationship between empirical data and intelligibility matrices and the historiographical and methodological consequences of this relationship.","PeriodicalId":250827,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Theoretical Psychologies","volume":"28 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Importance Of Decolonial Narratives\",\"authors\":\"Marcus Vinícius Amaral Gama Santos, Arthur Arruda Leal Ferreira\",\"doi\":\"10.7146/irtp.v2i1.142793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to discuss the importance of decolonial narratives in general and in the field of history of psychology in particular. For this, we take as the starting point the initial results of a recently published empirical study, which investigated different styles of management within the scope of labor in Rio de Janeiro between 1949 and 1965 through the analysis of publications of the journal Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia. Such results pointed to an inadequacy between the interpretations of the management styles that are used, on the one hand, in the English and North American context and, on the other, in Rio de Janeiro. The discussion of this article focuses on this inadequacy, underlining the differences between how colonial and decolonial narratives conceive the relationship between empirical data and intelligibility matrices and the historiographical and methodological consequences of this relationship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":250827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Theoretical Psychologies\",\"volume\":\"28 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Theoretical Psychologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7146/irtp.v2i1.142793\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Theoretical Psychologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/irtp.v2i1.142793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文旨在讨论非殖民叙事的重要性,特别是在心理学史领域的重要性。为此,我们以最近发表的一项实证研究的初步结果为出发点,该研究通过分析《Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia》杂志的出版物,调查了 1949 至 1965 年间里约热内卢劳动范围内的不同管理风格。这些结果表明,对英国和北美与里约热内卢所使用的管理方式的解释存在不足。本文的讨论集中于这一不足之处,强调了殖民地和非殖民地叙事如何看待经验数据和可理解矩阵之间的关系,以及这种关系在历史学和方法论上的后果。
This paper aims to discuss the importance of decolonial narratives in general and in the field of history of psychology in particular. For this, we take as the starting point the initial results of a recently published empirical study, which investigated different styles of management within the scope of labor in Rio de Janeiro between 1949 and 1965 through the analysis of publications of the journal Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia. Such results pointed to an inadequacy between the interpretations of the management styles that are used, on the one hand, in the English and North American context and, on the other, in Rio de Janeiro. The discussion of this article focuses on this inadequacy, underlining the differences between how colonial and decolonial narratives conceive the relationship between empirical data and intelligibility matrices and the historiographical and methodological consequences of this relationship.