光谱线翼截断的影响:应用于 MAESTRO 不透明度数据库的推荐标准方法

E. Gharib-Nezhad, N. Batalha, K. Chubb, Richard Freedman, Iouli E. Gordon, Robert R Gamache, Robert J Hargreaves, Nikole K Lewis, Jonathan Tennyson, S. Yurchenko
{"title":"光谱线翼截断的影响:应用于 MAESTRO 不透明度数据库的推荐标准方法","authors":"E. Gharib-Nezhad, N. Batalha, K. Chubb, Richard Freedman, Iouli E. Gordon, Robert R Gamache, Robert J Hargreaves, Nikole K Lewis, Jonathan Tennyson, S. Yurchenko","doi":"10.1093/rasti/rzad058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When computing cross-sections from a line list, the result depends not only on the line strength, but also the line shape, pressure-broadening parameters, and line wing cut-off (i.e. the maximum distance calculated from each line centre). Pressure-broadening can be described using the Lorentz lineshape, but it is known to not represent the true absorption in the far wings. Both theory and experiment have shown that far from the line centre, non-Lorentzian behaviour controls the shape of the wings and the Lorentz lineshape fails to accurately characterize the absorption, leading to an underestimation or overestimation of the opacity continuum depending on the molecular species involved. The line wing cut-off is an often overlooked parameter when calculating absorption cross sections, but can have a significant effect on the appearance of the spectrum since it dictates the extent of the line wing that contributes to the calculation either side of every line centre. Therefore, when used to analyse exoplanet and brown dwarf spectra, an inaccurate choice for the line wing cut-off can result in errors in the opacity continuum, which propagate into the modeled transit spectra, and ultimately impact/bias the interpretation of observational spectra, and the derived composition and thermal structure. Here, we examine the different methods commonly utilized to calculate the wing cut-off and propose a standard practice procedure (i.e. absolute value of 25 cm−1 for P ≤ 200 bar and 100 cm−1 for P > 200 bar) to generate molecular opacities which will be used by the open-access MAESTRO (Molecules and Atoms in Exoplanet Science: Tools and Resources for Opacities) database. The pressing need for new measurements and theoretical studies of the far-wings is highlighted.","PeriodicalId":367327,"journal":{"name":"RAS Techniques and Instruments","volume":"58 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of spectral line wing cut-off: Recommended standard method with application to MAESTRO opacity database\",\"authors\":\"E. Gharib-Nezhad, N. Batalha, K. Chubb, Richard Freedman, Iouli E. Gordon, Robert R Gamache, Robert J Hargreaves, Nikole K Lewis, Jonathan Tennyson, S. Yurchenko\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rasti/rzad058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When computing cross-sections from a line list, the result depends not only on the line strength, but also the line shape, pressure-broadening parameters, and line wing cut-off (i.e. the maximum distance calculated from each line centre). Pressure-broadening can be described using the Lorentz lineshape, but it is known to not represent the true absorption in the far wings. Both theory and experiment have shown that far from the line centre, non-Lorentzian behaviour controls the shape of the wings and the Lorentz lineshape fails to accurately characterize the absorption, leading to an underestimation or overestimation of the opacity continuum depending on the molecular species involved. The line wing cut-off is an often overlooked parameter when calculating absorption cross sections, but can have a significant effect on the appearance of the spectrum since it dictates the extent of the line wing that contributes to the calculation either side of every line centre. Therefore, when used to analyse exoplanet and brown dwarf spectra, an inaccurate choice for the line wing cut-off can result in errors in the opacity continuum, which propagate into the modeled transit spectra, and ultimately impact/bias the interpretation of observational spectra, and the derived composition and thermal structure. Here, we examine the different methods commonly utilized to calculate the wing cut-off and propose a standard practice procedure (i.e. absolute value of 25 cm−1 for P ≤ 200 bar and 100 cm−1 for P > 200 bar) to generate molecular opacities which will be used by the open-access MAESTRO (Molecules and Atoms in Exoplanet Science: Tools and Resources for Opacities) database. The pressing need for new measurements and theoretical studies of the far-wings is highlighted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":367327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RAS Techniques and Instruments\",\"volume\":\"58 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RAS Techniques and Instruments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rasti/rzad058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAS Techniques and Instruments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rasti/rzad058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从线表计算横截面时,结果不仅取决于线强度,还取决于线形状、压扩参数和线翼截距(即从每个线中心计算出的最大距离)。压扩可以用洛伦兹线形来描述,但众所周知,洛伦兹线形并不代表远翼的真实吸收。理论和实验都表明,在远离线中心的地方,非洛伦兹行为控制着线翼的形状,洛伦兹线形无法准确描述吸收,从而导致低估或高估不透明度连续波,具体取决于所涉及的分子种类。在计算吸收截面时,线翼截止是一个经常被忽视的参数,但它会对光谱的外观产生重大影响,因为它决定了每条线中心两侧的线翼对计算的贡献程度。因此,在分析系外行星和褐矮星光谱时,如果线翼截断的选择不准确,就会导致不透明度连续谱出现误差,并传播到建模的过境光谱中,最终影响/偏差观测光谱的解释以及得出的成分和热结构。在此,我们研究了常用于计算翼截距的不同方法,并提出了一个标准实践程序(即 P≤ 200 巴时绝对值为 25 cm-1,P > 200 巴时绝对值为 100 cm-1)来生成分子不透明度,该不透明度将用于开放式 MAESTRO(系外行星科学中的分子和原子:不透明度工具和资源)数据库。强调了对远翼进行新的测量和理论研究的迫切需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of spectral line wing cut-off: Recommended standard method with application to MAESTRO opacity database
When computing cross-sections from a line list, the result depends not only on the line strength, but also the line shape, pressure-broadening parameters, and line wing cut-off (i.e. the maximum distance calculated from each line centre). Pressure-broadening can be described using the Lorentz lineshape, but it is known to not represent the true absorption in the far wings. Both theory and experiment have shown that far from the line centre, non-Lorentzian behaviour controls the shape of the wings and the Lorentz lineshape fails to accurately characterize the absorption, leading to an underestimation or overestimation of the opacity continuum depending on the molecular species involved. The line wing cut-off is an often overlooked parameter when calculating absorption cross sections, but can have a significant effect on the appearance of the spectrum since it dictates the extent of the line wing that contributes to the calculation either side of every line centre. Therefore, when used to analyse exoplanet and brown dwarf spectra, an inaccurate choice for the line wing cut-off can result in errors in the opacity continuum, which propagate into the modeled transit spectra, and ultimately impact/bias the interpretation of observational spectra, and the derived composition and thermal structure. Here, we examine the different methods commonly utilized to calculate the wing cut-off and propose a standard practice procedure (i.e. absolute value of 25 cm−1 for P ≤ 200 bar and 100 cm−1 for P > 200 bar) to generate molecular opacities which will be used by the open-access MAESTRO (Molecules and Atoms in Exoplanet Science: Tools and Resources for Opacities) database. The pressing need for new measurements and theoretical studies of the far-wings is highlighted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Classifying LEO satellite platforms with boosted decision trees PyExoCross: a Python program for generating spectra and cross sections from molecular line lists The verification of periodicity with the use of recurrent neural networks REPUBLIC: A variability-preserving systematic-correction algorithm for PLATO’s multi-camera light curves A simple spacecraft – vector intersection methodology and applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1