慢性肛裂非手术治疗的效果:比较研究

Azhy Muhammed Dewana, Baderkhan Saeed Ahmed, Ahmed Abdulkadir Baban, Rawand Musheer Haweizy
{"title":"慢性肛裂非手术治疗的效果:比较研究","authors":"Azhy Muhammed Dewana, Baderkhan Saeed Ahmed, Ahmed Abdulkadir Baban, Rawand Musheer Haweizy","doi":"10.15218/zjms.2023.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objective: Chronic anal fissure is a common health problem related to high morbidity. The chemical option for treating chronic anal fissures is highly preferred. Methods: A clinical prospective comparative study was carried out in the General Surgery Outpatient Department in Rizgary Teaching Hospital, Erbil, KRG, during the period from January 2019 to December 2021,on a sample of 100 patients randomly recruited patients with chronic anal fissures divided into two groups with 50 participants each: the DTZ group, who received 2% diltiazem ointment, and the GTN group, who used 0.2% glyceryl trinitrate ointment twice daily for 6 consecutive weeks. The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and effects of topical Diltiazem (DTZ) and topical glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) in the management of chronic anal fissures. Results: There was a highly significant association between fissure healing at the 4th week and patients treated with DTZ (P <0.001). A highly significant association was observed at the 6th week between fissure healing and DTZ treatment (P <0.001), while there was later a highly significant association between fissure healing at the 8th week and patients treated with GTN (P <0.001). A significant association was observed between treatment adverse effects and patients treated with GTN (P = 0.05). DTZ was found to be more effective for symptomatic relief than GTN. Conclusion: Both DTZ and GTN are effective in the treatment of chronic anal fissures, but treatment with DTZ is accompanied by faster healing and lower side effects.","PeriodicalId":53383,"journal":{"name":"Zanco Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"143 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of non-surgical treatment of chronic anal fissure: A comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Azhy Muhammed Dewana, Baderkhan Saeed Ahmed, Ahmed Abdulkadir Baban, Rawand Musheer Haweizy\",\"doi\":\"10.15218/zjms.2023.031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and objective: Chronic anal fissure is a common health problem related to high morbidity. The chemical option for treating chronic anal fissures is highly preferred. Methods: A clinical prospective comparative study was carried out in the General Surgery Outpatient Department in Rizgary Teaching Hospital, Erbil, KRG, during the period from January 2019 to December 2021,on a sample of 100 patients randomly recruited patients with chronic anal fissures divided into two groups with 50 participants each: the DTZ group, who received 2% diltiazem ointment, and the GTN group, who used 0.2% glyceryl trinitrate ointment twice daily for 6 consecutive weeks. The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and effects of topical Diltiazem (DTZ) and topical glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) in the management of chronic anal fissures. Results: There was a highly significant association between fissure healing at the 4th week and patients treated with DTZ (P <0.001). A highly significant association was observed at the 6th week between fissure healing and DTZ treatment (P <0.001), while there was later a highly significant association between fissure healing at the 8th week and patients treated with GTN (P <0.001). A significant association was observed between treatment adverse effects and patients treated with GTN (P = 0.05). DTZ was found to be more effective for symptomatic relief than GTN. Conclusion: Both DTZ and GTN are effective in the treatment of chronic anal fissures, but treatment with DTZ is accompanied by faster healing and lower side effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zanco Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"143 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zanco Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15218/zjms.2023.031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zanco Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15218/zjms.2023.031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:慢性肛裂是一种常见的健康问题,发病率很高。治疗慢性肛裂的化学药物是首选。研究方法在 2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间,在库尔德地区埃尔比勒市里兹加里教学医院的普外科门诊部开展了一项临床前瞻性比较研究,研究对象为随机招募的 100 名慢性肛裂患者,分为两组,每组 50 人:DTZ 组使用 2% 地尔硫卓软膏,GTN 组使用 0.2% 三硝酸甘油酯软膏,每天两次,连续使用 6 周。该研究旨在比较地尔硫卓(DTZ)和三硝酸甘油酯(GTN)外用药在治疗慢性肛裂方面的疗效和作用。结果:肛裂在第 4 周愈合与使用 DTZ 治疗的患者有非常显著的关系(P <0.001)。第 6 周裂口愈合与 DTZ 治疗之间存在高度相关性(P <0.001),第 8 周裂口愈合与 GTN 治疗之间存在高度相关性(P <0.001)。治疗不良反应与使用 GTN 治疗的患者之间存在明显关联(P = 0.05)。与 GTN 相比,DTZ 能更有效地缓解症状。结论:DTZ 和 GTN 对治疗慢性肛裂均有效,但使用 DTZ 治疗愈合更快,副作用更小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes of non-surgical treatment of chronic anal fissure: A comparative study
Background and objective: Chronic anal fissure is a common health problem related to high morbidity. The chemical option for treating chronic anal fissures is highly preferred. Methods: A clinical prospective comparative study was carried out in the General Surgery Outpatient Department in Rizgary Teaching Hospital, Erbil, KRG, during the period from January 2019 to December 2021,on a sample of 100 patients randomly recruited patients with chronic anal fissures divided into two groups with 50 participants each: the DTZ group, who received 2% diltiazem ointment, and the GTN group, who used 0.2% glyceryl trinitrate ointment twice daily for 6 consecutive weeks. The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and effects of topical Diltiazem (DTZ) and topical glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) in the management of chronic anal fissures. Results: There was a highly significant association between fissure healing at the 4th week and patients treated with DTZ (P <0.001). A highly significant association was observed at the 6th week between fissure healing and DTZ treatment (P <0.001), while there was later a highly significant association between fissure healing at the 8th week and patients treated with GTN (P <0.001). A significant association was observed between treatment adverse effects and patients treated with GTN (P = 0.05). DTZ was found to be more effective for symptomatic relief than GTN. Conclusion: Both DTZ and GTN are effective in the treatment of chronic anal fissures, but treatment with DTZ is accompanied by faster healing and lower side effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correlation between auto-immune diseases and type 1 diabetes mellitus in the pediatric age group in Erbil city The development of ternary and quaternary solid dispersion based hydrotropic blends of atorvastatin calcium Drug metabolism and cytochrome P-450 (CYPs) Predictors of mortality among critical COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit in the Sulaimani governorate in 2021, Iraq Prevalence of COVID-19 among high school teachers in Erbil city
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1