KH.穆罕默德-卢特菲-戈扎利关于拉杜尼科学的思想

Muhamad Fatoni, Suminto Suminto, Muhammad Baba Kurnia, Kharismatus Zahrok, Isma Yunia Sari
{"title":"KH.穆罕默德-卢特菲-戈扎利关于拉杜尼科学的思想","authors":"Muhamad Fatoni, Suminto Suminto, Muhammad Baba Kurnia, Kharismatus Zahrok, Isma Yunia Sari","doi":"10.18860/ua.v24i2.23770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses KH. Muhammad Luthfi Ghozali’s thoughts on laduni science, that it can be gained by anyone who has valid reason. Generally, Muslim intellectuals such as al-Ghazâlî and Suhrawardî believe that laduni is given specially for saints. This is qualitative-library research since the primary data are from “Mencari Jati Diri Volume 2” book. Authors employed content and critical analysis. The study shows that Luthfi Ghozali’s laduni science epistemology is vague. First, his concept that laduni is laddunîyah rabbânîyah science which is primarily about legacy. Those who want the knowledge must establish a spiritual relationship in the form of tawas{s{ul. On the other hand, legacy should be given effortlessly. The second vagueness is on the knowledge journey theory. He stated, both ways (of gaining knowledge) begin from senses; while in his definition, laduni directly gets into one’s soul. The last is about the causes of acquisition. The second cause explained that piety is a result of riyâdhâh, mujâhadah, and dzikr-those three should be the real causes of laduni. The third cause, nubuwah and walâyah, is defined inconsistently. On one hand, it is meant for the prophets and saints. On the other hand, he defines it as closeness.","PeriodicalId":510724,"journal":{"name":"ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam","volume":"191 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE VAGUENESS OF KH. MUHAMMAD LUTHFI GHOZALI’S THOUGHTS ON LADUNI SCIENCE\",\"authors\":\"Muhamad Fatoni, Suminto Suminto, Muhammad Baba Kurnia, Kharismatus Zahrok, Isma Yunia Sari\",\"doi\":\"10.18860/ua.v24i2.23770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses KH. Muhammad Luthfi Ghozali’s thoughts on laduni science, that it can be gained by anyone who has valid reason. Generally, Muslim intellectuals such as al-Ghazâlî and Suhrawardî believe that laduni is given specially for saints. This is qualitative-library research since the primary data are from “Mencari Jati Diri Volume 2” book. Authors employed content and critical analysis. The study shows that Luthfi Ghozali’s laduni science epistemology is vague. First, his concept that laduni is laddunîyah rabbânîyah science which is primarily about legacy. Those who want the knowledge must establish a spiritual relationship in the form of tawas{s{ul. On the other hand, legacy should be given effortlessly. The second vagueness is on the knowledge journey theory. He stated, both ways (of gaining knowledge) begin from senses; while in his definition, laduni directly gets into one’s soul. The last is about the causes of acquisition. The second cause explained that piety is a result of riyâdhâh, mujâhadah, and dzikr-those three should be the real causes of laduni. The third cause, nubuwah and walâyah, is defined inconsistently. On one hand, it is meant for the prophets and saints. On the other hand, he defines it as closeness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam\",\"volume\":\"191 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v24i2.23770\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v24i2.23770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了 KH.Muhammad Luthfi Ghozali 对拉杜尼学的看法,即任何人只要有正当理由都可以获得拉杜尼学。一般来说,穆斯林知识分子,如 al-Ghazâlî 和 Suhrawardî 认为,拉杜尼学是专门为圣人而设的。这是一项图书馆定性研究,因为主要数据来自《Mencari Jati Diri Volume 2》一书。作者采用了内容分析和批判性分析。研究表明,卢特菲-戈扎利的拉杜尼科学认识论是模糊的。首先,他认为 laduni 是 laddunîyah rabbânîyah 科学,主要是关于遗产的概念。想要获得知识的人必须以 tawas{s{ul 的形式建立精神关系。另一方面,遗产应毫不费力地给予。第二个模糊之处在于知识之旅理论。他说,两种(获取知识的)方式都是从感官开始的;而在他的定义中,拉杜尼是直接进入人的灵魂的。最后是关于获得知识的原因。第二个原因解释说,虔诚是 riyâdhâh、mujâhadah 和 dzik 的结果--这三个应该是拉杜尼的真正原因。第三个原因是 "努布瓦 "和 "瓦拉耶",其定义前后矛盾。一方面,它指的是先知和圣人。另一方面,他又将其定义为亲近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE VAGUENESS OF KH. MUHAMMAD LUTHFI GHOZALI’S THOUGHTS ON LADUNI SCIENCE
This article discusses KH. Muhammad Luthfi Ghozali’s thoughts on laduni science, that it can be gained by anyone who has valid reason. Generally, Muslim intellectuals such as al-Ghazâlî and Suhrawardî believe that laduni is given specially for saints. This is qualitative-library research since the primary data are from “Mencari Jati Diri Volume 2” book. Authors employed content and critical analysis. The study shows that Luthfi Ghozali’s laduni science epistemology is vague. First, his concept that laduni is laddunîyah rabbânîyah science which is primarily about legacy. Those who want the knowledge must establish a spiritual relationship in the form of tawas{s{ul. On the other hand, legacy should be given effortlessly. The second vagueness is on the knowledge journey theory. He stated, both ways (of gaining knowledge) begin from senses; while in his definition, laduni directly gets into one’s soul. The last is about the causes of acquisition. The second cause explained that piety is a result of riyâdhâh, mujâhadah, and dzikr-those three should be the real causes of laduni. The third cause, nubuwah and walâyah, is defined inconsistently. On one hand, it is meant for the prophets and saints. On the other hand, he defines it as closeness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE VAGUENESS OF KH. MUHAMMAD LUTHFI GHOZALI’S THOUGHTS ON LADUNI SCIENCE THE WESTERN PRAGMATISM PHILOSOPHY BASED ON KALÂM JADÎD’S PERSPECTIVE SINTREN’S SACRED CADENCE: Journeying into the Mystical Dimensions of Spiritual Rhythms ILLUMINATING Al-ḤAQQ: Unveiling Truth and Reality in Ibn Barrajân's Sufi Paradigm and Systems Thinking FREUD’S VIEW ON THE ORIGIN OF RELIGION AND ITS CRITICISM ACCORDING TO ‘AQL AND NAQL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1