研究学生使用 ChatGPT 的意向:信任重要吗?

Md. Shahinur Rahman, M. Sabbir, Dr. Jing Zhang, Iqbal Hossain Moral, Gazi Md. Shakhawat Hossain
{"title":"研究学生使用 ChatGPT 的意向:信任重要吗?","authors":"Md. Shahinur Rahman, M. Sabbir, Dr. Jing Zhang, Iqbal Hossain Moral, Gazi Md. Shakhawat Hossain","doi":"10.14742/ajet.8956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Little knowledge is available on students’ attitudes and behavioural intentions towards using ChatGPT, a breakthrough innovation in recent times. This study bridges this gap by adding two relevant less-explored constructs (i.e., perceived enjoyment and perceived informativeness) to the technology acceptance model and illustrating the moderating effect of trust on the acceptance of ChatGPT. Data was collected from 344 private and public university students from Bangladesh, with the analysis done through structural equation modelling. The results highlight the significance of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and perceived informativeness in understanding students’ attitudes towards using ChatGPT for learning, which subsequently predicts their behavioural intention to use it. Interestingly, students’ level of enjoyment was triggered once the trust issue came into play, meaning perceived enjoyment had no substantial impact on attitude unless trust moderates the relationship between perceived enjoyment and attitude towards using ChatGPT. Implications for practice or policy Scholars can get first-hand insights into perceived enjoyment and perceived informativeness with perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in the context of ChatGPT and education. Practitioners and educators can comprehensively understand the antecedents affecting students’ attitudes in line with their behavioural intention towards ChatGPT. Policymakers can design viable strategies to promote the ethical and sustainable usage of ChatGPT in education.","PeriodicalId":502572,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"53 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining students’ intention to use ChatGPT: Does trust matter?\",\"authors\":\"Md. Shahinur Rahman, M. Sabbir, Dr. Jing Zhang, Iqbal Hossain Moral, Gazi Md. Shakhawat Hossain\",\"doi\":\"10.14742/ajet.8956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Little knowledge is available on students’ attitudes and behavioural intentions towards using ChatGPT, a breakthrough innovation in recent times. This study bridges this gap by adding two relevant less-explored constructs (i.e., perceived enjoyment and perceived informativeness) to the technology acceptance model and illustrating the moderating effect of trust on the acceptance of ChatGPT. Data was collected from 344 private and public university students from Bangladesh, with the analysis done through structural equation modelling. The results highlight the significance of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and perceived informativeness in understanding students’ attitudes towards using ChatGPT for learning, which subsequently predicts their behavioural intention to use it. Interestingly, students’ level of enjoyment was triggered once the trust issue came into play, meaning perceived enjoyment had no substantial impact on attitude unless trust moderates the relationship between perceived enjoyment and attitude towards using ChatGPT. Implications for practice or policy Scholars can get first-hand insights into perceived enjoyment and perceived informativeness with perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in the context of ChatGPT and education. Practitioners and educators can comprehensively understand the antecedents affecting students’ attitudes in line with their behavioural intention towards ChatGPT. Policymakers can design viable strategies to promote the ethical and sustainable usage of ChatGPT in education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology\",\"volume\":\"53 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8956\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学生对使用 ChatGPT 这一近代突破性创新的态度和行为意向知之甚少。本研究通过在技术接受模型中加入两个较少被探索的相关概念(即感知到的乐趣和感知到的信息量),并说明信任对 ChatGPT 接受度的调节作用,弥补了这一空白。数据收集自孟加拉国的 344 名私立和公立大学学生,并通过结构方程模型进行了分析。研究结果凸显了感知有用性、感知易用性和感知信息量在了解学生对使用 ChatGPT 学习的态度方面的重要性,这些因素随后会预测学生使用 ChatGPT 的行为意向。有趣的是,一旦信任问题出现,学生的喜爱程度就会被触发,这意味着除非信任调节了喜爱程度与使用 ChatGPT 的态度之间的关系,否则喜爱程度对态度没有实质性影响。对实践或政策的启示 学者们可以在 ChatGPT 和教育的背景下,对感知到的乐趣、感知到的信息量、感知到的有用性和感知到的易用性有第一手的了解。实践者和教育者可以全面了解影响学生对 ChatGPT 的态度的前因及其行为意向。政策制定者可以设计可行的策略,促进 ChatGPT 在教育领域的道德和可持续使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining students’ intention to use ChatGPT: Does trust matter?
Little knowledge is available on students’ attitudes and behavioural intentions towards using ChatGPT, a breakthrough innovation in recent times. This study bridges this gap by adding two relevant less-explored constructs (i.e., perceived enjoyment and perceived informativeness) to the technology acceptance model and illustrating the moderating effect of trust on the acceptance of ChatGPT. Data was collected from 344 private and public university students from Bangladesh, with the analysis done through structural equation modelling. The results highlight the significance of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and perceived informativeness in understanding students’ attitudes towards using ChatGPT for learning, which subsequently predicts their behavioural intention to use it. Interestingly, students’ level of enjoyment was triggered once the trust issue came into play, meaning perceived enjoyment had no substantial impact on attitude unless trust moderates the relationship between perceived enjoyment and attitude towards using ChatGPT. Implications for practice or policy Scholars can get first-hand insights into perceived enjoyment and perceived informativeness with perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in the context of ChatGPT and education. Practitioners and educators can comprehensively understand the antecedents affecting students’ attitudes in line with their behavioural intention towards ChatGPT. Policymakers can design viable strategies to promote the ethical and sustainable usage of ChatGPT in education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital storytelling in teacher education: Developing pre-service teachers’ critical thinking Making sense of student feedback and engagement using artificial intelligence Artificial intelligence-driven virtual patients for communication skill development in healthcare students: The affordances of artificial intelligence-based tools for supporting 21st-century skills: Student perceptions of weekly synchronous team quizzes in an online statistics course
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1