巴林特小组是一个精神化的机会吗?

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHIATRY British Journal of Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2023-12-18 DOI:10.1111/bjp.12880
Kinga Farkas, Gábor Csukly, Peter Fonagy
{"title":"巴林特小组是一个精神化的机会吗?","authors":"Kinga Farkas,&nbsp;Gábor Csukly,&nbsp;Peter Fonagy","doi":"10.1111/bjp.12880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Balint group, a time-tested and efficacious resource for fortifying resilience among helping professionals, is explored in depth in this article through a case vignette. Despite its demonstrated efficacy in assisting professionals handling challenging cases, the Balint method's adoption remains inexplicably limited. We hypothesize that this restraint is due to a deficient understanding of the method's mechanics, operational processes and outcomes. In response, we offer a contemporary interpretation anchored in the theoretical framework of mentalization, aligning with current psychotherapeutic standards. The article underscores the Balint group's remarkable utility, akin to other mentalization-based therapeutic methods, in navigating intricate cases, emotionally demanding situations and circumstances that exceed the expertise and experience of the professional. By highlighting this, we hope to broaden the acceptance of the method, enable systematic assessment of its effectiveness and augment training for group leaders and participant commitment. This endeavour represents both a nod to the research-centric approach originally espoused by Mihály Bálint and an embrace of the growing emphasis on evidence-based methodology in medicine and psychotherapy. Ultimately, we aim to illuminate the potential of the Balint group and promote its extensive application in support of helping professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":54130,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Psychotherapy","volume":"40 1","pages":"55-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjp.12880","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the Balint Group an Opportunity to Mentalize?\",\"authors\":\"Kinga Farkas,&nbsp;Gábor Csukly,&nbsp;Peter Fonagy\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjp.12880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Balint group, a time-tested and efficacious resource for fortifying resilience among helping professionals, is explored in depth in this article through a case vignette. Despite its demonstrated efficacy in assisting professionals handling challenging cases, the Balint method's adoption remains inexplicably limited. We hypothesize that this restraint is due to a deficient understanding of the method's mechanics, operational processes and outcomes. In response, we offer a contemporary interpretation anchored in the theoretical framework of mentalization, aligning with current psychotherapeutic standards. The article underscores the Balint group's remarkable utility, akin to other mentalization-based therapeutic methods, in navigating intricate cases, emotionally demanding situations and circumstances that exceed the expertise and experience of the professional. By highlighting this, we hope to broaden the acceptance of the method, enable systematic assessment of its effectiveness and augment training for group leaders and participant commitment. This endeavour represents both a nod to the research-centric approach originally espoused by Mihály Bálint and an embrace of the growing emphasis on evidence-based methodology in medicine and psychotherapy. Ultimately, we aim to illuminate the potential of the Balint group and promote its extensive application in support of helping professionals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"55-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjp.12880\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjp.12880\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjp.12880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

巴林特小组是一种久经考验的有效资源,可以增强帮助专业人员的抗压能力,本文通过一个案例对其进行了深入探讨。尽管巴林特方法在帮助专业人员处理具有挑战性的案例方面具有明显的功效,但它的应用仍然受到限制,这一点令人费解。我们假设,这种限制是由于对该方法的机制、操作过程和结果理解不足造成的。对此,我们根据当前的心理治疗标准,以心智化理论框架为基础,提出了当代的解释。这篇文章强调了巴林特小组与其他基于心智化的治疗方法一样,在处理错综复杂的案例、情绪紧张的情况以及超出专业人员专业知识和经验范围的情况时,具有显著的实用性。通过强调这一点,我们希望扩大对该方法的接受度,对其有效性进行系统评估,并加强对小组领导者和参与者承诺的培训。这一努力既是对米哈伊-巴林特(Mihály Bálint)最初倡导的以研究为中心的方法的认可,也是对医学和心理疗法中日益强调的循证方法的支持。最终,我们的目标是阐明巴林特小组的潜力,并促进其广泛应用,为帮助专业人士提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is the Balint Group an Opportunity to Mentalize?

The Balint group, a time-tested and efficacious resource for fortifying resilience among helping professionals, is explored in depth in this article through a case vignette. Despite its demonstrated efficacy in assisting professionals handling challenging cases, the Balint method's adoption remains inexplicably limited. We hypothesize that this restraint is due to a deficient understanding of the method's mechanics, operational processes and outcomes. In response, we offer a contemporary interpretation anchored in the theoretical framework of mentalization, aligning with current psychotherapeutic standards. The article underscores the Balint group's remarkable utility, akin to other mentalization-based therapeutic methods, in navigating intricate cases, emotionally demanding situations and circumstances that exceed the expertise and experience of the professional. By highlighting this, we hope to broaden the acceptance of the method, enable systematic assessment of its effectiveness and augment training for group leaders and participant commitment. This endeavour represents both a nod to the research-centric approach originally espoused by Mihály Bálint and an embrace of the growing emphasis on evidence-based methodology in medicine and psychotherapy. Ultimately, we aim to illuminate the potential of the Balint group and promote its extensive application in support of helping professionals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
50.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychotherapy is a journal for psychoanalytic and Jungian-analytic thinkers, with a focus on both innovatory and everyday work on the unconscious in individual, group and institutional practice. As an analytic journal, it has long occupied a unique place in the field of psychotherapy journals with an Editorial Board drawn from a wide range of psychoanalytic, psychoanalytic psychotherapy, psychodynamic, and analytical psychology training organizations. As such, its psychoanalytic frame of reference is wide-ranging and includes all schools of analytic practice. Conscious that many clinicians do not work only in the consulting room, the Journal encourages dialogue between private practice and institutionally based practice. Recognizing that structures and dynamics in each environment differ, the Journal provides a forum for an exploration of their differing potentials and constraints. Mindful of significant change in the wider contemporary context for psychotherapy, and within a changing regulatory framework, the Journal seeks to represent current debate about this context.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - Cover and Editorial Board Editorial November 2024 Primitive Bodily Communications in Psychotherapy: Embodied Expressions of a Disembodied Psyche. Raffaella Hilty (ed.). Published by Karnac, London, 2022; 224 pp, £26.99 (paperback), £24.00 (eBook), £31.99 (paperback and eBook). Clinical Commentary 49 Poetry and Psychoanalysis: The Opening of the Field, by David Shaddock. Published by Routledge, London and New York, 2020; 194 pp, £130.00 (hardback), £32.99 (paperback), £29.69 (eBook). Part of the Routledge Art, Creativity, and Psychoanalysis Book Series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1