考虑几何随机性的电磁兼容模拟中随机伽勒金方法的失效机理分析

Jinjun Bai, Bing Hu, Yixuan Wan
{"title":"考虑几何随机性的电磁兼容模拟中随机伽勒金方法的失效机理分析","authors":"Jinjun Bai, Bing Hu, Yixuan Wan","doi":"10.13052/2023.aces.j.380702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By virtue of its high calculational accuracy and efficiency, the stochastic Galerkin method (SGM) has been successfully applied many times in electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) simulation in recent years. This paper proposes a calculating example taking geometric uncertainty factors into consideration. As is proved in the paper, there is a relatively large error when using the SGM to solve the example mentioned above. According to failure mechanism, the fundamental reason of the failure of the simulation lies in the additional error caused by using numerical integration to solve the inner product formula. Meanwhile, it is proved that no additional errors are introduced when using the stochastic collocation method (SCM), so the SCM is better than the SGM in stability. In the end, the paper revised the general selective strategy for uncertainty analysis methods, thus providing theoretical basis for their universal application in EMC field.","PeriodicalId":250668,"journal":{"name":"The Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal (ACES)","volume":"26 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Failure Mechanism Analysis of the Stochastic Galerkin Method in EMC Simulation Considering Geometric Randomness\",\"authors\":\"Jinjun Bai, Bing Hu, Yixuan Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.13052/2023.aces.j.380702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By virtue of its high calculational accuracy and efficiency, the stochastic Galerkin method (SGM) has been successfully applied many times in electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) simulation in recent years. This paper proposes a calculating example taking geometric uncertainty factors into consideration. As is proved in the paper, there is a relatively large error when using the SGM to solve the example mentioned above. According to failure mechanism, the fundamental reason of the failure of the simulation lies in the additional error caused by using numerical integration to solve the inner product formula. Meanwhile, it is proved that no additional errors are introduced when using the stochastic collocation method (SCM), so the SCM is better than the SGM in stability. In the end, the paper revised the general selective strategy for uncertainty analysis methods, thus providing theoretical basis for their universal application in EMC field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":250668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal (ACES)\",\"volume\":\"26 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal (ACES)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13052/2023.aces.j.380702\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal (ACES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13052/2023.aces.j.380702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随机伽勒金法(SGM)凭借其计算精度高、效率高的特点,近年来已多次成功应用于电磁兼容(EMC)仿真。本文提出了一个考虑几何不确定性因素的计算实例。文中证明,使用 SGM 求解上述示例时存在较大误差。根据失败机理,模拟失败的根本原因在于使用数值积分求解内积公式时产生了额外误差。同时证明,使用随机搭配法(SCM)不会带来额外误差,因此 SCM 在稳定性方面优于 SGM。最后,本文修正了不确定性分析方法的一般选择策略,从而为其在电磁兼容领域的普遍应用提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Failure Mechanism Analysis of the Stochastic Galerkin Method in EMC Simulation Considering Geometric Randomness
By virtue of its high calculational accuracy and efficiency, the stochastic Galerkin method (SGM) has been successfully applied many times in electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) simulation in recent years. This paper proposes a calculating example taking geometric uncertainty factors into consideration. As is proved in the paper, there is a relatively large error when using the SGM to solve the example mentioned above. According to failure mechanism, the fundamental reason of the failure of the simulation lies in the additional error caused by using numerical integration to solve the inner product formula. Meanwhile, it is proved that no additional errors are introduced when using the stochastic collocation method (SCM), so the SCM is better than the SGM in stability. In the end, the paper revised the general selective strategy for uncertainty analysis methods, thus providing theoretical basis for their universal application in EMC field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A 3-D Global FDTD Courant-limit Model of the Earth for Long-time-span and High-altitude Applications Uncertainty Quantification and Optimal Design of EV-WPT System Efficiency based on Adaptive Gaussian Process Regression Single-mode Condition and Bending Loss Analysis of Ultrafast Laser-inscribed Mid-infrared Waveguides in GeAsSe Chalcogenide Glass Design of Wilkinson Power Dividers with SITL Compensated Microstrip Bandpass Filters Resonant Frequency Modelling of Microstrip Antennas by Consensus Network and Student’s-T Process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1