{"title":"公司根据 NL-GAAP 对修订后的收入确认指南的第一年应用情况","authors":"Roy van Duuren, Ralph ter Hoeven","doi":"10.5117/mab.97.113397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on the revenue recognition disclosure quality of a sample of 63 large Dutch legal entities applying revised DAS 221 and DAS 270 in their 2022 financial statements. A large majority of companies in our sample use a prospective method for transitioning to the revised standards, though many companies were not really transparent in disclosing the transition method used. Further, only a small portion of companies in our sample (35%) disclosed how the revisions impacted their solvency. Overall, we conclude that the effects of the amended guidance in DAS 221/270 appear to be limited in financial reporting practice and that disclosure quality varies to a large extent. Also, we recommend the DASB to add specific disclosure requirements to DAS 221","PeriodicalId":506079,"journal":{"name":"Maandblad voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie","volume":"176 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First year’s application of revised revenue recognition guidance by companies under NL-GAAP\",\"authors\":\"Roy van Duuren, Ralph ter Hoeven\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/mab.97.113397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study focuses on the revenue recognition disclosure quality of a sample of 63 large Dutch legal entities applying revised DAS 221 and DAS 270 in their 2022 financial statements. A large majority of companies in our sample use a prospective method for transitioning to the revised standards, though many companies were not really transparent in disclosing the transition method used. Further, only a small portion of companies in our sample (35%) disclosed how the revisions impacted their solvency. Overall, we conclude that the effects of the amended guidance in DAS 221/270 appear to be limited in financial reporting practice and that disclosure quality varies to a large extent. Also, we recommend the DASB to add specific disclosure requirements to DAS 221\",\"PeriodicalId\":506079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maandblad voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie\",\"volume\":\"176 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maandblad voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/mab.97.113397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maandblad voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/mab.97.113397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究侧重于 63 家荷兰大型法律实体的收入确认披露质量,这些实体在其 2022 年财务报表中应用了修订后的 DAS 221 和 DAS 270。在我们的样本中,绝大多数公司都采用前瞻性方法过渡到修订后的准则,但许多公司在披露所采用的过渡方法时并不真正透明。此外,样本中只有一小部分公司(35%)披露了修订对其偿付能力的影响。总之,我们得出的结论是,DAS 221/270 中的修订指南在财务报告实践中的影响似乎有限,而且披露质量在很大程度上存在差异。同时,我们建议会计标准委员会在 DAS 221 中增加具体的披露要求。
First year’s application of revised revenue recognition guidance by companies under NL-GAAP
This study focuses on the revenue recognition disclosure quality of a sample of 63 large Dutch legal entities applying revised DAS 221 and DAS 270 in their 2022 financial statements. A large majority of companies in our sample use a prospective method for transitioning to the revised standards, though many companies were not really transparent in disclosing the transition method used. Further, only a small portion of companies in our sample (35%) disclosed how the revisions impacted their solvency. Overall, we conclude that the effects of the amended guidance in DAS 221/270 appear to be limited in financial reporting practice and that disclosure quality varies to a large extent. Also, we recommend the DASB to add specific disclosure requirements to DAS 221