战后加拿大移民政策中的叙利亚、亚美尼亚和黎巴嫩白人主张

Vic Satzewich, Leili Yousefi
{"title":"战后加拿大移民政策中的叙利亚、亚美尼亚和黎巴嫩白人主张","authors":"Vic Satzewich, Leili Yousefi","doi":"10.1017/nps.2023.82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article asks how, in early post-World War II Canada, Syrian, Armenian, and Lebanese communities claimed whiteness in the context of Canada’s racially restrictive immigration regulations that defined them as “Asiatics,” and hence inadmissible. But, it also examines how Canadian politicians and immigration bureaucrats responded to those claims. Using so-far untapped archival records, this article shows that immigration authorities were unwilling to redefine the racial status of these groups out of fear that doing so would provide a wedge for other groups of “Asiatics” to press for the ability to migrate to Canada. In this case, Syrians, Armenians, and Lebanese could be regarded as experiencing collateral damage in the politics of whiteness. While Canadian immigration authorities seemed to privately accept the white/European identity claims of these groups, they were nonetheless unwilling to publicly grant them one of the privileges of whiteness – namely the ability to migrate to Canada on a basis equal to that of other white immigrants. Instead, the government used “merit-based” orders-in-council as an under the radar administrative mechanism to admit members of these groups. This allowed the government and the immigration department to avoid a larger public debate about racial discrimination against “Asiatic” immigrants.","PeriodicalId":508038,"journal":{"name":"Nationalities Papers","volume":"69 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Syrian, Armenian, and Lebanese Claims to Whiteness in Post-War Canadian Immigration Policy\",\"authors\":\"Vic Satzewich, Leili Yousefi\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/nps.2023.82\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article asks how, in early post-World War II Canada, Syrian, Armenian, and Lebanese communities claimed whiteness in the context of Canada’s racially restrictive immigration regulations that defined them as “Asiatics,” and hence inadmissible. But, it also examines how Canadian politicians and immigration bureaucrats responded to those claims. Using so-far untapped archival records, this article shows that immigration authorities were unwilling to redefine the racial status of these groups out of fear that doing so would provide a wedge for other groups of “Asiatics” to press for the ability to migrate to Canada. In this case, Syrians, Armenians, and Lebanese could be regarded as experiencing collateral damage in the politics of whiteness. While Canadian immigration authorities seemed to privately accept the white/European identity claims of these groups, they were nonetheless unwilling to publicly grant them one of the privileges of whiteness – namely the ability to migrate to Canada on a basis equal to that of other white immigrants. Instead, the government used “merit-based” orders-in-council as an under the radar administrative mechanism to admit members of these groups. This allowed the government and the immigration department to avoid a larger public debate about racial discrimination against “Asiatic” immigrants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nationalities Papers\",\"volume\":\"69 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nationalities Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2023.82\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nationalities Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2023.82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了二战后早期的加拿大,叙利亚人、亚美尼亚人和黎巴嫩人是如何在加拿大种族限制性移民法规将他们定义为 "亚洲人 "并因此不被允许入境的背景下宣称自己是白人的。但是,该书也探讨了加拿大政治家和移民官僚是如何回应这些诉求的。本文利用迄今为止尚未开发的档案记录表明,移民当局不愿意重新界定这些群体的种族地位,因为他们担心这样做会为其他 "亚裔 "群体提供楔子,迫使他们获得移民加拿大的能力。在这种情况下,叙利亚人、亚美尼亚人和黎巴嫩人可以被视为白人政治中的附带损害。虽然加拿大移民当局似乎私下里接受了这些群体的白人/欧洲人身份诉求,但却不愿公开给予他们白人特权之一--即与其他白人移民同等的移民加拿大的能力。相反,政府利用 "择优 "枢密院令(merit-based order-in-council)这一暗箱操作的行政机制来接纳这些群体的成员。这使得政府和移民部得以避免就针对 "亚洲 "移民的种族歧视问题展开更大规模的公开辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Syrian, Armenian, and Lebanese Claims to Whiteness in Post-War Canadian Immigration Policy
This article asks how, in early post-World War II Canada, Syrian, Armenian, and Lebanese communities claimed whiteness in the context of Canada’s racially restrictive immigration regulations that defined them as “Asiatics,” and hence inadmissible. But, it also examines how Canadian politicians and immigration bureaucrats responded to those claims. Using so-far untapped archival records, this article shows that immigration authorities were unwilling to redefine the racial status of these groups out of fear that doing so would provide a wedge for other groups of “Asiatics” to press for the ability to migrate to Canada. In this case, Syrians, Armenians, and Lebanese could be regarded as experiencing collateral damage in the politics of whiteness. While Canadian immigration authorities seemed to privately accept the white/European identity claims of these groups, they were nonetheless unwilling to publicly grant them one of the privileges of whiteness – namely the ability to migrate to Canada on a basis equal to that of other white immigrants. Instead, the government used “merit-based” orders-in-council as an under the radar administrative mechanism to admit members of these groups. This allowed the government and the immigration department to avoid a larger public debate about racial discrimination against “Asiatic” immigrants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Presidential Discourses on Regionalism in Azerbaijan: Turkic Solidarity and the Silk Road Response to Comments on Estate Origins of Democracy in Russia Artistic Forms of Shaping Ukrainian National Identity by Leon Getz Promoting Justice across Borders: The Ethics of Reform Intervention, by Lucia Rafanelli, New York: Oxford University Press, 2021, 280 pp., $86 (hardback), ISBN 9780197568842, $39.95 (paperback), ISBN 9780197770566. Great Power Competition, Clientelism, and De Facto States: Transnistria and Taiwan Compared
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1