对绿色清洗的关注和怀疑:对消费者行为影响的分析

T. Andreoli, Silvio Augusto Minciotti
{"title":"对绿色清洗的关注和怀疑:对消费者行为影响的分析","authors":"T. Andreoli, Silvio Augusto Minciotti","doi":"10.5902/1983465973743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The goal was to assess the influence of greenwashing on consumer behavior, according to the levels of attention and skepticism involved in receiving and processing the stimulus. Design/methodology/approach: The method consisted of a hypothetical-deductive approach, performed through an experiment (n=151) with a 2 (attention or pre-attention) x 2 (skepticism or non-skepticism) factorial design, with the presentation and subsequent evaluation of a fictional advertising image with greenwashing. Findings: It was observed that the situation of greater consumer criticality occurred with the presence of both attention and skepticism, the opposite also being true, that is, lesser criticality (or greater vulnerability) of consumer was detected when both attention (pre-attention) and skepticism were absent. These results were found in the three investigated variables: green associations, image evaluation, and judgment about the greenwashing practice. Research implications: It has, as a contribution, not only the investigation of fairly unexplored constructs but also the combination and study in a connected way, bringing to the discussion the cognitive processes involved in the reception, processing, registration, and recovery of stimuli, especially in relation to the process of attention, and linking them to the practice of greenwashing. Practical implications: Managing implications can be seen from three main perspectives: organization, consumers, and government, all related to the importance and need for greater awareness. Originality/value: The study provided an unprecedented understanding of the role of two important cognitive processes (attention and skepticism) in consumer behavior in reaction to the practice of greenwashing.","PeriodicalId":197586,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Administração da UFSM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attention and skepticism to greenwashing: analysis of influence on consumer behavior\",\"authors\":\"T. Andreoli, Silvio Augusto Minciotti\",\"doi\":\"10.5902/1983465973743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The goal was to assess the influence of greenwashing on consumer behavior, according to the levels of attention and skepticism involved in receiving and processing the stimulus. Design/methodology/approach: The method consisted of a hypothetical-deductive approach, performed through an experiment (n=151) with a 2 (attention or pre-attention) x 2 (skepticism or non-skepticism) factorial design, with the presentation and subsequent evaluation of a fictional advertising image with greenwashing. Findings: It was observed that the situation of greater consumer criticality occurred with the presence of both attention and skepticism, the opposite also being true, that is, lesser criticality (or greater vulnerability) of consumer was detected when both attention (pre-attention) and skepticism were absent. These results were found in the three investigated variables: green associations, image evaluation, and judgment about the greenwashing practice. Research implications: It has, as a contribution, not only the investigation of fairly unexplored constructs but also the combination and study in a connected way, bringing to the discussion the cognitive processes involved in the reception, processing, registration, and recovery of stimuli, especially in relation to the process of attention, and linking them to the practice of greenwashing. Practical implications: Managing implications can be seen from three main perspectives: organization, consumers, and government, all related to the importance and need for greater awareness. Originality/value: The study provided an unprecedented understanding of the role of two important cognitive processes (attention and skepticism) in consumer behavior in reaction to the practice of greenwashing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Administração da UFSM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Administração da UFSM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465973743\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Administração da UFSM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465973743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:根据消费者在接受和处理刺激时的注意力和怀疑程度,评估 "绿色清洗 "对消费者行为的影响。设计/方法/途径:该方法包括假设-演绎法,通过一个 2(注意或预注意)x2(怀疑或非怀疑)因子设计的实验(n=151),展示并随后评估带有绿色清洗的虚构广告形象。研究结果结果表明,在同时存在注意和怀疑的情况下,消费者的批判性较强;反之亦然,即在同时不存在注意(预先注意)和怀疑的情况下,消费者的批判性较弱(或脆弱性较强)。这些结果出现在三个调查变量中:绿色联想、形象评价和对绿色清洗行为的判断。研究意义:该研究的贡献在于,不仅调查了相当多尚未探索的概念,而且以一种关联的方式进行了组合和研究,将刺激的接收、处理、注册和恢复所涉及的认知过程,特别是与注意过程有关的认知过程,与绿色清洗行为联系起来,进行了讨论。实际意义:可以从组织、消费者和政府三个主要角度来看待管理意义,它们都与提高意识的重要性和必要性有关。原创性/价值:这项研究让我们前所未有地了解了消费者行为中两个重要的认知过程(注意力和怀疑态度)在对绿色清洗行为的反应中所起的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Attention and skepticism to greenwashing: analysis of influence on consumer behavior
Purpose: The goal was to assess the influence of greenwashing on consumer behavior, according to the levels of attention and skepticism involved in receiving and processing the stimulus. Design/methodology/approach: The method consisted of a hypothetical-deductive approach, performed through an experiment (n=151) with a 2 (attention or pre-attention) x 2 (skepticism or non-skepticism) factorial design, with the presentation and subsequent evaluation of a fictional advertising image with greenwashing. Findings: It was observed that the situation of greater consumer criticality occurred with the presence of both attention and skepticism, the opposite also being true, that is, lesser criticality (or greater vulnerability) of consumer was detected when both attention (pre-attention) and skepticism were absent. These results were found in the three investigated variables: green associations, image evaluation, and judgment about the greenwashing practice. Research implications: It has, as a contribution, not only the investigation of fairly unexplored constructs but also the combination and study in a connected way, bringing to the discussion the cognitive processes involved in the reception, processing, registration, and recovery of stimuli, especially in relation to the process of attention, and linking them to the practice of greenwashing. Practical implications: Managing implications can be seen from three main perspectives: organization, consumers, and government, all related to the importance and need for greater awareness. Originality/value: The study provided an unprecedented understanding of the role of two important cognitive processes (attention and skepticism) in consumer behavior in reaction to the practice of greenwashing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Let’s get some food! The influence of marital status on the attributes’ perception of food delivery applications Scale of competencies for sustainability at the organizational scope The challenges of connecting situational leadership and emotional intelligence Understanding Smart Cities: A Systematic Review Economia circular e práticas sustentáveis adotadas por agricultores familiares
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1