喀麦隆大学学术界对大学领导任命的性质和传统的看法

Novel Folabit, Sarasvathie Reddy, L. Jita
{"title":"喀麦隆大学学术界对大学领导任命的性质和传统的看法","authors":"Novel Folabit, Sarasvathie Reddy, L. Jita","doi":"10.26803/ijlter.22.11.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The appointment of leaders at Cameroonian universities is a tradition that has dominated the operations and autonomy of the institutions since the establishment of state universities under the 1993 reforms. This gave authority to the government to decide the pedagogical and academic activities of these universities and to appoint and dismiss their leaders without accountability. Based on a larger study, this qualitative single-case study employed semi-structured interviews and reflective practices in the form of reflective journals. The perspectives of 11 purposively selected academics were explored regarding their perspective on the appointment process of leaders at a Cameroonian university and its implication on their professional identities. Distributed leadership theory and the force field model for teacher development were the theoretical frameworks used for data generation and analysis. Data were thematically analyzed, with analysis indicating that the two-step commission process at the university and Ministry of Higher Education, designed to appoint qualified individuals, is often bypassed. Some individuals secure leadership positions through political, economic, and tribal connections. Individuals appointed based on affinities often lack the necessary skills and competence, sometimes displaying limited knowledge of the system’s functioning. Conversely, qualified candidates without such affiliations are often overlooked, primarily due to their apolitical stance, resulting in their files frequently being left unassessed for appointments. It is recommended that policymakers, university leaders, and other stakeholders collaborate to establish transparent, merit-based appointment processes, while maintaining the autonomy of the institutions.","PeriodicalId":37101,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academics’ Perspectives on the Nature and Tradition of Appointments of University Leaders at a Cameroonian University\",\"authors\":\"Novel Folabit, Sarasvathie Reddy, L. Jita\",\"doi\":\"10.26803/ijlter.22.11.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". The appointment of leaders at Cameroonian universities is a tradition that has dominated the operations and autonomy of the institutions since the establishment of state universities under the 1993 reforms. This gave authority to the government to decide the pedagogical and academic activities of these universities and to appoint and dismiss their leaders without accountability. Based on a larger study, this qualitative single-case study employed semi-structured interviews and reflective practices in the form of reflective journals. The perspectives of 11 purposively selected academics were explored regarding their perspective on the appointment process of leaders at a Cameroonian university and its implication on their professional identities. Distributed leadership theory and the force field model for teacher development were the theoretical frameworks used for data generation and analysis. Data were thematically analyzed, with analysis indicating that the two-step commission process at the university and Ministry of Higher Education, designed to appoint qualified individuals, is often bypassed. Some individuals secure leadership positions through political, economic, and tribal connections. Individuals appointed based on affinities often lack the necessary skills and competence, sometimes displaying limited knowledge of the system’s functioning. Conversely, qualified candidates without such affiliations are often overlooked, primarily due to their apolitical stance, resulting in their files frequently being left unassessed for appointments. It is recommended that policymakers, university leaders, and other stakeholders collaborate to establish transparent, merit-based appointment processes, while maintaining the autonomy of the institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.11.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.11.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

.喀麦隆大学领导的任命是一个传统,自 1993 年改革建立国立大学以来,这一传统一直主宰着大学的运作和自主权。这使得政府有权决定这些大学的教学和学术活动,有权任命和罢免其领导人,而无需承担任何责任。在一项大型研究的基础上,这项单一案例定性研究采用了半结构化访谈和反思日志形式的反思实践。研究人员有针对性地选取了 11 名学者,探讨了他们对喀麦隆一所大学领导任命程序的看法及其对其职业身份的影响。分布式领导理论和教师发展力场模型是生成和分析数据的理论框架。对数据进行了专题分析,分析表明,大学和高等教育部旨在任命合格人员的两步委托程序往往被绕过。一些人通过政治、经济和部落关系获得领导职位。根据亲缘关系任命的人员往往缺乏必要的技能和能力,有时对系统的运作了解有限。相反,没有这种关系的合格候选人往往被忽视,主要是由于他们的非政治立场,导致他们的档案经常未经评估就被任命。建议政策制定者、大学领导和其他利益相关者通力合作,建立透明、择优任用的程序,同时保持各机构的自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Academics’ Perspectives on the Nature and Tradition of Appointments of University Leaders at a Cameroonian University
. The appointment of leaders at Cameroonian universities is a tradition that has dominated the operations and autonomy of the institutions since the establishment of state universities under the 1993 reforms. This gave authority to the government to decide the pedagogical and academic activities of these universities and to appoint and dismiss their leaders without accountability. Based on a larger study, this qualitative single-case study employed semi-structured interviews and reflective practices in the form of reflective journals. The perspectives of 11 purposively selected academics were explored regarding their perspective on the appointment process of leaders at a Cameroonian university and its implication on their professional identities. Distributed leadership theory and the force field model for teacher development were the theoretical frameworks used for data generation and analysis. Data were thematically analyzed, with analysis indicating that the two-step commission process at the university and Ministry of Higher Education, designed to appoint qualified individuals, is often bypassed. Some individuals secure leadership positions through political, economic, and tribal connections. Individuals appointed based on affinities often lack the necessary skills and competence, sometimes displaying limited knowledge of the system’s functioning. Conversely, qualified candidates without such affiliations are often overlooked, primarily due to their apolitical stance, resulting in their files frequently being left unassessed for appointments. It is recommended that policymakers, university leaders, and other stakeholders collaborate to establish transparent, merit-based appointment processes, while maintaining the autonomy of the institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
220
期刊最新文献
The Potential of Linguistic Landscapes for the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language in Cuenca, Ecuador Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices of Learner Autonomy: A Case Study in Vietnam Reflection Analysis of Resilient and Sustainable Research and Publication Activities at the National University of Science & Technology, Oman during COVID-19 The Effectiveness of Team Teaching in Improving Reading Skill among Thai EFL Undergraduates and Their Attitudes toward this Strategy Testing the Healthy School Organisation Instrument (i-OS) and the Holistic Psychological Well-Being Model of School Organisations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1