分析哥斯达黎加和西班牙学生对概率和比率的比较

Q3 Social Sciences Statistics Education Research Journal Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI:10.52041/serj.v22i3.659
C. Batanero, L. A. Hernández-Solís, M. Gea
{"title":"分析哥斯达黎加和西班牙学生对概率和比率的比较","authors":"C. Batanero, L. A. Hernández-Solís, M. Gea","doi":"10.52041/serj.v22i3.659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present an exploratory study of Costa Rican and Spanish students’ (11–16-year-olds) competence to compare probabilities in urns and compare ratios in mixture problems. A sample of 704 students in Grades 6 through to Grade 10, 292 from Costa Rica and 412 from Spain, were given one of two forms of a questionnaire with three probability comparison and three ratio comparison problems each. The full questionnaire consisting of both forms covers six different proportional reasoning levels for each type of problem. We analysed the percentages of correct responses to the items and the strategies used by students in each grade and in each country. The results suggest students had the highest difficulty in comparing probabilities for items at the same proportional reasoning level. The results also point to the probabilistic biases in students’ responses, although these biases were less frequent than in previous research.","PeriodicalId":38581,"journal":{"name":"Statistics Education Research Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALYSING COSTA RICAN AND SPANISH STUDENTS’ COMPARISONS OF PROBABILITIES AND RATIOS\",\"authors\":\"C. Batanero, L. A. Hernández-Solís, M. Gea\",\"doi\":\"10.52041/serj.v22i3.659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present an exploratory study of Costa Rican and Spanish students’ (11–16-year-olds) competence to compare probabilities in urns and compare ratios in mixture problems. A sample of 704 students in Grades 6 through to Grade 10, 292 from Costa Rica and 412 from Spain, were given one of two forms of a questionnaire with three probability comparison and three ratio comparison problems each. The full questionnaire consisting of both forms covers six different proportional reasoning levels for each type of problem. We analysed the percentages of correct responses to the items and the strategies used by students in each grade and in each country. The results suggest students had the highest difficulty in comparing probabilities for items at the same proportional reasoning level. The results also point to the probabilistic biases in students’ responses, although these biases were less frequent than in previous research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistics Education Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistics Education Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v22i3.659\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics Education Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v22i3.659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对哥斯达黎加和西班牙学生(11-16 岁)比较瓮中概率和比较混合问题中比率的能力进行了一项探索性研究。我们对 704 名六年级至十年级的学生进行了抽样调查,其中 292 名学生来自哥斯达黎加,412 名学生来自西班牙,他们接受了两种形式中的一种问卷调查,每种形式都包含三个概率比较问题和三个比率比较问题。由两种形式组成的完整问卷涵盖了每类问题的六种不同比例推理水平。我们分析了每个年级和每个国家的学生对题目的正确回答百分比和使用的策略。结果表明,在同一比例推理水平的题目中,学生比较概率的难度最大。结果还表明,学生的回答存在概率偏差,尽管这些偏差比以往的研究要少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ANALYSING COSTA RICAN AND SPANISH STUDENTS’ COMPARISONS OF PROBABILITIES AND RATIOS
We present an exploratory study of Costa Rican and Spanish students’ (11–16-year-olds) competence to compare probabilities in urns and compare ratios in mixture problems. A sample of 704 students in Grades 6 through to Grade 10, 292 from Costa Rica and 412 from Spain, were given one of two forms of a questionnaire with three probability comparison and three ratio comparison problems each. The full questionnaire consisting of both forms covers six different proportional reasoning levels for each type of problem. We analysed the percentages of correct responses to the items and the strategies used by students in each grade and in each country. The results suggest students had the highest difficulty in comparing probabilities for items at the same proportional reasoning level. The results also point to the probabilistic biases in students’ responses, although these biases were less frequent than in previous research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistics Education Research Journal
Statistics Education Research Journal Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: SERJ is a peer-reviewed electronic journal of the International Association for Statistical Education (IASE) and the International Statistical Institute (ISI). SERJ is published twice a year and is free. SERJ aims to advance research-based knowledge that can help to improve the teaching, learning, and understanding of statistics or probability at all educational levels and in both formal (classroom-based) and informal (out-of-classroom) contexts. Such research may examine, for example, cognitive, motivational, attitudinal, curricular, teaching-related, technology-related, organizational, or societal factors and processes that are related to the development and understanding of stochastic knowledge. In addition, research may focus on how people use or apply statistical and probabilistic information and ideas, broadly viewed. The Journal encourages the submission of quality papers related to the above goals, such as reports of original research (both quantitative and qualitative), integrative and critical reviews of research literature, analyses of research-based theoretical and methodological models, and other types of papers described in full in the Guidelines for Authors. All papers are reviewed internally by an Associate Editor or Editor, and are blind-reviewed by at least two external referees. Contributions in English are recommended. Contributions in French and Spanish will also be considered. A submitted paper must not have been published before or be under consideration for publication elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
TEACHING AND LEARNING TO CONSTRUCT DATA-BASED DECISION TREES USING DATA CARDS AS THE FIRST INTRODUCTION TO MACHINE LEARNING IN MIDDLE SCHOOL EXAMINING THE ROLE OF CONTEXT IN STATISTICAL LITERACY OUTCOMES USING AN ISOMORPHIC ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT BRAZILIAN RESEARCH IN STATISTICS, PROBABILITY AND COMBINATORICS EDUCATION: A LOOK AT THESES RESOURCES AND TENSIONS IN STUDENT THINKING ABOUT STATISTICAL DESIGN OPPORTUNITIES TO LEARN MEAN, MEDIAN, AND MODE AFFORDED BY TEXTBOOK TASKS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1