对接受免疫抑制治疗的血液病患者乙型肝炎病毒再激活频率和乙型肝炎预防重要性的评估:一项单中心研究

Ali Doğan, Ömer Ekinci, Narin Yıldırım Doğan, Taner Kıvanç, Sinan Demircioğlu, C. Demir, Cihan Ural, Ramazan Esen, Ahmet Karakarçayıldız, Yasin Mamiş
{"title":"对接受免疫抑制治疗的血液病患者乙型肝炎病毒再激活频率和乙型肝炎预防重要性的评估:一项单中心研究","authors":"Ali Doğan, Ömer Ekinci, Narin Yıldırım Doğan, Taner Kıvanç, Sinan Demircioğlu, C. Demir, Cihan Ural, Ramazan Esen, Ahmet Karakarçayıldız, Yasin Mamiş","doi":"10.51271/jchor-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) in hematology patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy in our center and the clinical characteristics of patients with HBVr. We will also investigate the importance of effective prevention of this potentially life-threatening event and management of hepatitis B virus (HBV) prophylaxis. Methods: In this study, hepatitis B prophylaxis and its effects on patients over 18 years of age receiving immunosuppressive therapy in the hematology clinic were analyzed. 122 patients were included in the study. The HBV markers of the patients were determined by the chemiluminescence method. In the study, HbsAg(+) and isolated antiHbc IgG-positive patients received prophylactic antiviral treatment. The differential diagnosis of HBV reactivation and the criteria determined to define HBV reactivation were performed. Clinical characteristics and descriptive information of patients receiving HBV prophylaxis were analyzed using SPSS 25.0. Results: The median age of 122 patients (59.8% male) was 58 years. It was determined that five HbsAg-positive patients had no prior follow-up and did not receive antiviral treatment. 117 patients had isolated anti-HBc IgG positivity. The median duration of prophylaxis was 15 (9- 21.25) months, and the total follow-up period was 19.5 (11.75- 30.25) months. 81.1% of the patients received regular HBV prophylaxis treatment; 59% of them received entecavir, and the rest received tenofovir disoproxil. Bone marrow transplantation was performed in 25 patients. HBV reactivation was detected in only 4 patients (3.3%); one of these patients had received allogeneic and one autologous bone marrow transplantation; and three patients had received chemoimmunotherapy including Rituximab. The diagnoses of the patients with HBVr were acute myeloid leukemia, lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. During the follow-up period, 29 patients (23.8%) died due to their primary disease, but there were no deaths due to HBV reactivation. Conclusion: The data obtained in this study show that effective hepatitis B prophylaxis treatment is successful in preventing HBV reactivation in hematology patients. HBVr was observed in four patients who did not take HBV prophylaxis medication regularly.","PeriodicalId":171029,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Hematology & Oncology Research","volume":"255 7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the frequency of hepatitis b virus reactivation and the importance of hepatitis b prophylaxis in hematology patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy: a single-center study\",\"authors\":\"Ali Doğan, Ömer Ekinci, Narin Yıldırım Doğan, Taner Kıvanç, Sinan Demircioğlu, C. Demir, Cihan Ural, Ramazan Esen, Ahmet Karakarçayıldız, Yasin Mamiş\",\"doi\":\"10.51271/jchor-0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) in hematology patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy in our center and the clinical characteristics of patients with HBVr. We will also investigate the importance of effective prevention of this potentially life-threatening event and management of hepatitis B virus (HBV) prophylaxis. Methods: In this study, hepatitis B prophylaxis and its effects on patients over 18 years of age receiving immunosuppressive therapy in the hematology clinic were analyzed. 122 patients were included in the study. The HBV markers of the patients were determined by the chemiluminescence method. In the study, HbsAg(+) and isolated antiHbc IgG-positive patients received prophylactic antiviral treatment. The differential diagnosis of HBV reactivation and the criteria determined to define HBV reactivation were performed. Clinical characteristics and descriptive information of patients receiving HBV prophylaxis were analyzed using SPSS 25.0. Results: The median age of 122 patients (59.8% male) was 58 years. It was determined that five HbsAg-positive patients had no prior follow-up and did not receive antiviral treatment. 117 patients had isolated anti-HBc IgG positivity. The median duration of prophylaxis was 15 (9- 21.25) months, and the total follow-up period was 19.5 (11.75- 30.25) months. 81.1% of the patients received regular HBV prophylaxis treatment; 59% of them received entecavir, and the rest received tenofovir disoproxil. Bone marrow transplantation was performed in 25 patients. HBV reactivation was detected in only 4 patients (3.3%); one of these patients had received allogeneic and one autologous bone marrow transplantation; and three patients had received chemoimmunotherapy including Rituximab. The diagnoses of the patients with HBVr were acute myeloid leukemia, lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. During the follow-up period, 29 patients (23.8%) died due to their primary disease, but there were no deaths due to HBV reactivation. Conclusion: The data obtained in this study show that effective hepatitis B prophylaxis treatment is successful in preventing HBV reactivation in hematology patients. HBVr was observed in four patients who did not take HBV prophylaxis medication regularly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":171029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Current Hematology & Oncology Research\",\"volume\":\"255 7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Current Hematology & Oncology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51271/jchor-0019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Hematology & Oncology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51271/jchor-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估本中心接受免疫抑制治疗的血液病患者的乙型肝炎病毒再活化(HBVr)率以及 HBVr 患者的临床特征。我们还将探讨有效预防这一可能危及生命的事件和乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)预防管理的重要性。 方法:在这项研究中,我们分析了乙型肝炎预防措施及其对在血液科门诊接受免疫抑制治疗的 18 岁以上患者的影响。研究共纳入 122 名患者。采用化学发光法测定了患者的 HBV 标志物。研究中,HbsAg(+)和分离抗 Hbc IgG 阳性患者接受了预防性抗病毒治疗。对 HBV 再激活进行了鉴别诊断,并确定了界定 HBV 再激活的标准。使用 SPSS 25.0 分析了接受 HBV 预防性治疗的患者的临床特征和描述性信息。结果122 名患者(59.8% 为男性)的中位年龄为 58 岁。经确定,5 名 HbsAg 阳性患者之前没有接受过随访,也没有接受过抗病毒治疗。117 名患者的抗 HBc IgG 阳性。中位预防时间为 15(9- 21.25)个月,总随访时间为 19.5(11.75- 30.25)个月。81.1%的患者接受了正规的HBV预防治疗,其中59%接受了恩替卡韦治疗,其余接受了替诺福韦酯治疗。25 名患者进行了骨髓移植。仅在 4 名患者(3.3%)中发现了 HBV 再激活;其中一名患者接受了异体骨髓移植,一名患者接受了自体骨髓移植;三名患者接受了包括利妥昔单抗在内的化疗免疫疗法。HBVr 患者的诊断为急性髓性白血病、淋巴瘤和慢性淋巴细胞白血病。在随访期间,29 名患者(23.8%)因原发病死亡,但没有人因 HBV 再激活而死亡。结论本研究获得的数据表明,有效的乙肝预防治疗能成功预防血液病患者的 HBV 再激活。在四名未定期服用 HBV 预防药物的患者中观察到 HBVr。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the frequency of hepatitis b virus reactivation and the importance of hepatitis b prophylaxis in hematology patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy: a single-center study
Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) in hematology patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy in our center and the clinical characteristics of patients with HBVr. We will also investigate the importance of effective prevention of this potentially life-threatening event and management of hepatitis B virus (HBV) prophylaxis. Methods: In this study, hepatitis B prophylaxis and its effects on patients over 18 years of age receiving immunosuppressive therapy in the hematology clinic were analyzed. 122 patients were included in the study. The HBV markers of the patients were determined by the chemiluminescence method. In the study, HbsAg(+) and isolated antiHbc IgG-positive patients received prophylactic antiviral treatment. The differential diagnosis of HBV reactivation and the criteria determined to define HBV reactivation were performed. Clinical characteristics and descriptive information of patients receiving HBV prophylaxis were analyzed using SPSS 25.0. Results: The median age of 122 patients (59.8% male) was 58 years. It was determined that five HbsAg-positive patients had no prior follow-up and did not receive antiviral treatment. 117 patients had isolated anti-HBc IgG positivity. The median duration of prophylaxis was 15 (9- 21.25) months, and the total follow-up period was 19.5 (11.75- 30.25) months. 81.1% of the patients received regular HBV prophylaxis treatment; 59% of them received entecavir, and the rest received tenofovir disoproxil. Bone marrow transplantation was performed in 25 patients. HBV reactivation was detected in only 4 patients (3.3%); one of these patients had received allogeneic and one autologous bone marrow transplantation; and three patients had received chemoimmunotherapy including Rituximab. The diagnoses of the patients with HBVr were acute myeloid leukemia, lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. During the follow-up period, 29 patients (23.8%) died due to their primary disease, but there were no deaths due to HBV reactivation. Conclusion: The data obtained in this study show that effective hepatitis B prophylaxis treatment is successful in preventing HBV reactivation in hematology patients. HBVr was observed in four patients who did not take HBV prophylaxis medication regularly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do mean platelet volume and platelet count vary on a daily or gender basis? Factors affecting prognosis in myelodysplastic syndrome: an 11 years’ experience from a tertiary care center Get two with one: bevacizumab treatment in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia with concomitant cirrhosis Effect of vitamin D on prognosis in patients with gastric cancer Comparison of efficacy and tolerability of single agent and double agent chemotherapy regimens in first-line treatment of elderly patients with her-2 negative metastatic gastric cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1