{"title":"韩语中表示同居的后缀 taeng-i 衍生物","authors":"Yu-seok Kwak","doi":"10.51157/kmor.2023.25.2.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to explain the semantic and formal characteristics of ‘taeng-i'. ‘taeng-i’ is widely used as a suffix in ‘pejoration’. However, aside from the meaning ‘pejoration’, it is also used in ‘emphasis’, even for ‘affection’ and ‘intimacy’, presenting positive connotations. Like so, the meaning of ‘taeng-i’ can include from ‘pejoration’ and ‘emphasis’ to ‘affection’ and ‘intimacy’ because of their commonality in which the speaker uses such words to evaluate a subject. On the other hand, the most reasonable explanation of how the term ‘taeng-i’ was created is that it derived from diminutive. This is to say, from a cross-linguistic perspective, diminutives also include meaning from ‘pejoration’ and ‘emphasis’ to ‘affection’ and ‘intimacy’. Moreover, there is an important factor to consider that ‘taeng-i’ shares the base with other similar suffixes in its form and meaning such as ‘ttaeng-i, pang-i, tung-i, ‘jab-i, jaeng-i, tae-gi, du-la-ji, dung-a-li, and dung-i’ to form synonyms.","PeriodicalId":51849,"journal":{"name":"Morphology","volume":"93 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suffixal taeng-i derivatives denoting pejoration in Korean\",\"authors\":\"Yu-seok Kwak\",\"doi\":\"10.51157/kmor.2023.25.2.117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to explain the semantic and formal characteristics of ‘taeng-i'. ‘taeng-i’ is widely used as a suffix in ‘pejoration’. However, aside from the meaning ‘pejoration’, it is also used in ‘emphasis’, even for ‘affection’ and ‘intimacy’, presenting positive connotations. Like so, the meaning of ‘taeng-i’ can include from ‘pejoration’ and ‘emphasis’ to ‘affection’ and ‘intimacy’ because of their commonality in which the speaker uses such words to evaluate a subject. On the other hand, the most reasonable explanation of how the term ‘taeng-i’ was created is that it derived from diminutive. This is to say, from a cross-linguistic perspective, diminutives also include meaning from ‘pejoration’ and ‘emphasis’ to ‘affection’ and ‘intimacy’. Moreover, there is an important factor to consider that ‘taeng-i’ shares the base with other similar suffixes in its form and meaning such as ‘ttaeng-i, pang-i, tung-i, ‘jab-i, jaeng-i, tae-gi, du-la-ji, dung-a-li, and dung-i’ to form synonyms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Morphology\",\"volume\":\"93 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Morphology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51157/kmor.2023.25.2.117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Morphology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51157/kmor.2023.25.2.117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Suffixal taeng-i derivatives denoting pejoration in Korean
The purpose of this paper is to explain the semantic and formal characteristics of ‘taeng-i'. ‘taeng-i’ is widely used as a suffix in ‘pejoration’. However, aside from the meaning ‘pejoration’, it is also used in ‘emphasis’, even for ‘affection’ and ‘intimacy’, presenting positive connotations. Like so, the meaning of ‘taeng-i’ can include from ‘pejoration’ and ‘emphasis’ to ‘affection’ and ‘intimacy’ because of their commonality in which the speaker uses such words to evaluate a subject. On the other hand, the most reasonable explanation of how the term ‘taeng-i’ was created is that it derived from diminutive. This is to say, from a cross-linguistic perspective, diminutives also include meaning from ‘pejoration’ and ‘emphasis’ to ‘affection’ and ‘intimacy’. Moreover, there is an important factor to consider that ‘taeng-i’ shares the base with other similar suffixes in its form and meaning such as ‘ttaeng-i, pang-i, tung-i, ‘jab-i, jaeng-i, tae-gi, du-la-ji, dung-a-li, and dung-i’ to form synonyms.
期刊介绍:
Aim The aim of Morphology is to publish high quality articles that contribute to the further articulation of morphological theory and linguistic theory in general, or present new and unexplored data. Relevant empirical evidence for the theoretical claims in the articles will be provided by in-depth analyses of specific languages or by comparative, cross-linguistic analyses of the relevant facts. The sources of data can be grammatical descriptions, corpora of data concerning language use and other naturalistic data, and experiments. Scope Morphology publishes articles on morphology proper, as well as articles on the interaction of morphology with phonology, syntax, and semantics, the acquisition and processing of morphological information, the nature of the mental lexicon, and morphological variation and change. Its main focus is on formal models of morphological knowledge, morphological typology (the range and limits of variation in natural languages), the position of morphology in the architecture of the human language faculty, and the evolution and change of language. In addition, the journal deals with the acquisition of morphological knowledge and its role in language processing. Articles on computational morphology and neurolinguistic approaches to morphology are also welcome. The first volume of Morphology appeared as Volume 16 (2006). Previous volumes were published under the title Yearbook of Morphology.