对波兰语-英语双语成人口吃者的口吃和典型不流利现象的初步调查:多案例研究法

Aleksandra Krawczyk, Martine Vanryckeghem, Katarzyna Węsierska, Anthony Pak-Hin Kong, Peixin Xu
{"title":"对波兰语-英语双语成人口吃者的口吃和典型不流利现象的初步调查:多案例研究法","authors":"Aleksandra Krawczyk, Martine Vanryckeghem, Katarzyna Węsierska, Anthony Pak-Hin Kong, Peixin Xu","doi":"10.18778/2544-7238.07.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzes the frequency of stuttering and typical disfluencies in Polish‑English bilingual adults who stutter during cross‑linguistic dialogue, monologue, and oral reading contexts. Additionally, the relationship between English proficiency and stuttering and typical disfluency frequencies was examined. The study aims to contribute to the body of research regarding differential considerations between monolingual and bilinguals who stutter. Data collection took place via video conferencing. Participants first completed an English proficiency cloze test, where they entered missing words in a short English text. Following this, randomized dialogue, monologue, and oral reading speech samples in Polish and English were collected. The correlation between cloze test scores and frequency of stuttering and typical disfluency in the English samples was also examined. All participants experienced more stuttering in English (L2) than Polish (L1) during dialogue. Overall, participants had increased stuttering in L2 for at least one speaking task. Seventy one percent of participants had increased typical disfluencies in L2 for dialogue and monologue. Most participants evidenced an increase in stuttering and typical disfluencies in L2 compared to L1. The results suggest that language proficiency may share a relationship between frequency of stuttering and typical disfluencies, highlighting the importance of collecting cross‑linguistic speech data during assessment to reach clinical decisions related to fluency disorders in bilingual populations.","PeriodicalId":507402,"journal":{"name":"Logopaedica Lodziensia","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A preliminary investigation of stutteringand typical disfluencies in bilingual Polish‑English adults who stutter: A multiple cases approach\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandra Krawczyk, Martine Vanryckeghem, Katarzyna Węsierska, Anthony Pak-Hin Kong, Peixin Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.18778/2544-7238.07.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study analyzes the frequency of stuttering and typical disfluencies in Polish‑English bilingual adults who stutter during cross‑linguistic dialogue, monologue, and oral reading contexts. Additionally, the relationship between English proficiency and stuttering and typical disfluency frequencies was examined. The study aims to contribute to the body of research regarding differential considerations between monolingual and bilinguals who stutter. Data collection took place via video conferencing. Participants first completed an English proficiency cloze test, where they entered missing words in a short English text. Following this, randomized dialogue, monologue, and oral reading speech samples in Polish and English were collected. The correlation between cloze test scores and frequency of stuttering and typical disfluency in the English samples was also examined. All participants experienced more stuttering in English (L2) than Polish (L1) during dialogue. Overall, participants had increased stuttering in L2 for at least one speaking task. Seventy one percent of participants had increased typical disfluencies in L2 for dialogue and monologue. Most participants evidenced an increase in stuttering and typical disfluencies in L2 compared to L1. The results suggest that language proficiency may share a relationship between frequency of stuttering and typical disfluencies, highlighting the importance of collecting cross‑linguistic speech data during assessment to reach clinical decisions related to fluency disorders in bilingual populations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Logopaedica Lodziensia\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Logopaedica Lodziensia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18778/2544-7238.07.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logopaedica Lodziensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/2544-7238.07.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析了波兰语-英语双语成人在跨语言对话、独白和口头阅读语境中口吃的频率和典型的不流利现象。此外,研究还探讨了英语水平与口吃和典型不流利语频之间的关系。该研究旨在为有关口吃的单语和双语者之间的差异考虑的研究做出贡献。数据收集通过视频会议进行。受试者首先完成英语熟练程度掐词测试,在短小的英语文本中输入缺失的单词。随后,收集波兰语和英语的随机对话、独白和口头阅读语音样本。此外,还研究了掐词测试得分与英语样本中口吃频率和典型不流利现象之间的相关性。在对话过程中,所有参与者的英语(第二语言)口吃程度都高于波兰语(第一语言)。总体而言,至少在一项口语任务中,参与者在 L2 中的口吃现象有所增加。71%的参与者在对话和独白中的典型口吃增加。与 L1 相比,大多数参与者在 L2 中的口吃和典型不流利现象都有所增加。研究结果表明,语言能力可能与口吃频率和典型不流利现象之间存在某种关系,这突出表明了在评估过程中收集跨语言言语数据的重要性,以便对双语人群的流利性障碍做出临床决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A preliminary investigation of stutteringand typical disfluencies in bilingual Polish‑English adults who stutter: A multiple cases approach
This study analyzes the frequency of stuttering and typical disfluencies in Polish‑English bilingual adults who stutter during cross‑linguistic dialogue, monologue, and oral reading contexts. Additionally, the relationship between English proficiency and stuttering and typical disfluency frequencies was examined. The study aims to contribute to the body of research regarding differential considerations between monolingual and bilinguals who stutter. Data collection took place via video conferencing. Participants first completed an English proficiency cloze test, where they entered missing words in a short English text. Following this, randomized dialogue, monologue, and oral reading speech samples in Polish and English were collected. The correlation between cloze test scores and frequency of stuttering and typical disfluency in the English samples was also examined. All participants experienced more stuttering in English (L2) than Polish (L1) during dialogue. Overall, participants had increased stuttering in L2 for at least one speaking task. Seventy one percent of participants had increased typical disfluencies in L2 for dialogue and monologue. Most participants evidenced an increase in stuttering and typical disfluencies in L2 compared to L1. The results suggest that language proficiency may share a relationship between frequency of stuttering and typical disfluencies, highlighting the importance of collecting cross‑linguistic speech data during assessment to reach clinical decisions related to fluency disorders in bilingual populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Symultaniczno-Sekwencyjna Nauka Czytania® w przedszkolu Terapia afazji niejedno ma imię. O grupowej rehabilitacji logopedycznej dorosłych z zaburzeniami afatycznymi Ujęzykowienie myśli poprzez pismo – analiza komunikacji pisemnej wybranej grupy dzieci ze spektrum autyzmu Wykorzystanie metody "Nonviolent Communication" (NVC) w terapii głosu zaburzonego Ocena sprawności językowej, komunikacyjnej i grafomotorycznej na przykładzie opisu. Studium przypadku ucznia z niepełnosprawnością intelektualną w stopniu lekkim
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1