术前超声引导下胸椎间平面阻滞与术前胸椎竖脊平面阻滞对改良根治性乳房切除术后急性和慢性疼痛的影响:随机对照试验

IF 0.6 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2023-11-28 DOI:10.1080/11101849.2023.2285268
Areeg Kotb Ghalwash, Naglaa Khalil Yousef, Sabry Mohammed Amin, Mohamed Alaa Elsaid Barrima, Taysser Mohmoud Abdalraheem
{"title":"术前超声引导下胸椎间平面阻滞与术前胸椎竖脊平面阻滞对改良根治性乳房切除术后急性和慢性疼痛的影响:随机对照试验","authors":"Areeg Kotb Ghalwash, Naglaa Khalil Yousef, Sabry Mohammed Amin, Mohamed Alaa Elsaid Barrima, Taysser Mohmoud Abdalraheem","doi":"10.1080/11101849.2023.2285268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background More than 50% of individuals who have breast surgery have acute postoperative pain, and 8% among those patients endure persistent severe pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of ultrasound-guided thoracic inter-fascial plane block (US-guided TIFPB) and ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block (US-guided ESPB) on acute and chronic pain following modified radical mastectomy (MRM) surgeries. Methods 90 female participants who were hospitalized for unilateral MRM surgery underwent this prospective randomized controlled trial. Patients were split into three equal groups at random: Group I: received preoperative TIFPB, group II: received preoperative ESPB, group III: received preoperative sham block (control group). Results VAS was considerably lower in group I at 12 h (P1 = 0.029) and when group III is compared with groups I and II at 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 h (P < 0.05). First analgesic requires was greatly delayed in time and total morphine consumption was significantly decreased compared to group III in groups I and II (P < 0.001) and was insignificantly different between both groups I and II. Chronic pain 3, 6 months postoperative was markedly decreased in comparison to group III in groups I and II (P < 0.05). Conclusions TIFPB and ESPB were comparable, both were superior to control in terms of lower intraoperative fentanyl consumption, pain score, first analgesic requirement onset is delayed, lower total consumption of morphine, chronic pain 3 and 6 months postoperatively. TIFPB showed a lower pain score at 12 hr. postoperatively compared to ESPB.","PeriodicalId":11437,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"48 1","pages":"912 - 920"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of preoperative ultrasound-guided thoracic interfacial plane block versus preoperative thoracic erector spinae plane block on acute and chronic pain after modified radical mastectomy: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Areeg Kotb Ghalwash, Naglaa Khalil Yousef, Sabry Mohammed Amin, Mohamed Alaa Elsaid Barrima, Taysser Mohmoud Abdalraheem\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11101849.2023.2285268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background More than 50% of individuals who have breast surgery have acute postoperative pain, and 8% among those patients endure persistent severe pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of ultrasound-guided thoracic inter-fascial plane block (US-guided TIFPB) and ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block (US-guided ESPB) on acute and chronic pain following modified radical mastectomy (MRM) surgeries. Methods 90 female participants who were hospitalized for unilateral MRM surgery underwent this prospective randomized controlled trial. Patients were split into three equal groups at random: Group I: received preoperative TIFPB, group II: received preoperative ESPB, group III: received preoperative sham block (control group). Results VAS was considerably lower in group I at 12 h (P1 = 0.029) and when group III is compared with groups I and II at 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 h (P < 0.05). First analgesic requires was greatly delayed in time and total morphine consumption was significantly decreased compared to group III in groups I and II (P < 0.001) and was insignificantly different between both groups I and II. Chronic pain 3, 6 months postoperative was markedly decreased in comparison to group III in groups I and II (P < 0.05). Conclusions TIFPB and ESPB were comparable, both were superior to control in terms of lower intraoperative fentanyl consumption, pain score, first analgesic requirement onset is delayed, lower total consumption of morphine, chronic pain 3 and 6 months postoperatively. TIFPB showed a lower pain score at 12 hr. postoperatively compared to ESPB.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"912 - 920\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2285268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2285268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ABSTRACT 背景 50%以上的乳腺手术患者会出现术后急性疼痛,其中 8%的患者会忍受持续性剧烈疼痛。本研究旨在评估超声引导下胸筋膜间平面阻滞(US-guided TIFPB)和超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞(US-guided ESPB)对改良根治性乳房切除术(MRM)术后急性和慢性疼痛的疗效。方法 90 名因单侧 MRM 手术住院的女性患者接受了这项前瞻性随机对照试验。患者被随机分成三个相同的组别:第一组:术前接受 TIFPB,第二组:术前接受 ESPB,第三组:术前接受假阻滞(对照组)。结果 I 组在 12 小时后的 VAS 显著降低(P1 = 0.029),III 组与 I 组和 II 组相比,在 2、4、6、12、18 和 24 小时后的 VAS 显著降低(P < 0.05)。与Ⅲ组相比,Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组的首次镇痛时间大大推迟,吗啡总用量明显减少(P < 0.001),Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组之间的差异不明显。I 组和 II 组与 III 组相比,术后 3、6 个月的慢性疼痛明显减少(P < 0.05)。结论 TIFPB 和 ESPB 具有可比性,两者在术中芬太尼消耗量、疼痛评分、首次镇痛需求开始时间延迟、吗啡总消耗量降低、术后 3 个月和 6 个月慢性疼痛方面均优于对照组。与 ESPB 相比,TIFPB 在术后 12 小时的疼痛评分更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of preoperative ultrasound-guided thoracic interfacial plane block versus preoperative thoracic erector spinae plane block on acute and chronic pain after modified radical mastectomy: A randomized controlled trial
ABSTRACT Background More than 50% of individuals who have breast surgery have acute postoperative pain, and 8% among those patients endure persistent severe pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of ultrasound-guided thoracic inter-fascial plane block (US-guided TIFPB) and ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block (US-guided ESPB) on acute and chronic pain following modified radical mastectomy (MRM) surgeries. Methods 90 female participants who were hospitalized for unilateral MRM surgery underwent this prospective randomized controlled trial. Patients were split into three equal groups at random: Group I: received preoperative TIFPB, group II: received preoperative ESPB, group III: received preoperative sham block (control group). Results VAS was considerably lower in group I at 12 h (P1 = 0.029) and when group III is compared with groups I and II at 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 h (P < 0.05). First analgesic requires was greatly delayed in time and total morphine consumption was significantly decreased compared to group III in groups I and II (P < 0.001) and was insignificantly different between both groups I and II. Chronic pain 3, 6 months postoperative was markedly decreased in comparison to group III in groups I and II (P < 0.05). Conclusions TIFPB and ESPB were comparable, both were superior to control in terms of lower intraoperative fentanyl consumption, pain score, first analgesic requirement onset is delayed, lower total consumption of morphine, chronic pain 3 and 6 months postoperatively. TIFPB showed a lower pain score at 12 hr. postoperatively compared to ESPB.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊最新文献
Intrathecal levo-bupivacaine versus hyperbaric bupivacaine for inguinal hernia repairs in ex-preterm infants: A double blinded randomized prospective study Comparison of two different methods as reliable predictors of successful caudal block in children Effect of sevoflurane versus propofol on early cognitive functions in elderly patients after lumbar disc surgery Muscle wasting assessed by ultrasound versus scoring systems as early predictor of outcomes of intensive care unit stay in critically ill patients Posterior quadratus lumborum versus caudal epidural block for perioperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing upper abdominal surgeries: Arandomized, double-blind trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1