大学生对毕业生雇主甄选测试的看法

M. Quigley, Charlotte Smith, Eloise Stocker, Alexander Bradley
{"title":"大学生对毕业生雇主甄选测试的看法","authors":"M. Quigley, Charlotte Smith, Eloise Stocker, Alexander Bradley","doi":"10.1108/et-05-2022-0188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of the current study was to examine university students' knowledge, confidence and experience of popular graduate employer selection tests.Design/methodology/approachA cross-sectional self-report survey was administered to gather a sufficient number of quantitative responses from undergraduate students. A total of 241 students completed the survey with most of them being psychology students from Swansea University. Four key variables were examined: (1) students' experience, (2) confidence and (3) knowledge of selection tests and (4) their desire for more information about selection tests as part of their degree. An audit of selection tests used by the Times Top 100 graduate employers was also conducted.FindingsStudents tended to misjudge how often selection tests were used by employers, and generally lacked experience with these tests. Students' confidence in completing each test varied as a function of the selection test; however, prior experience with these tests positively predicted confidence. Additionally, over 70% of students reported a desire for further information about selection tests as part of their degree.Practical implicationsThese novel findings suggest that students could benefit from further information about selection tests as part of their degree programme which would be of benefit to both students and universities.Originality/valueThese findings are, to the authors knowledge, the first to explicitly assess second- and third-year undergraduate students' knowledge, experience and confidence with popular graduate employer selection tests and demonstrate that students would like more information about these tests on their programme.","PeriodicalId":503966,"journal":{"name":"Education + Training","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"University students' perceptions of graduate employer selection tests\",\"authors\":\"M. Quigley, Charlotte Smith, Eloise Stocker, Alexander Bradley\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/et-05-2022-0188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe purpose of the current study was to examine university students' knowledge, confidence and experience of popular graduate employer selection tests.Design/methodology/approachA cross-sectional self-report survey was administered to gather a sufficient number of quantitative responses from undergraduate students. A total of 241 students completed the survey with most of them being psychology students from Swansea University. Four key variables were examined: (1) students' experience, (2) confidence and (3) knowledge of selection tests and (4) their desire for more information about selection tests as part of their degree. An audit of selection tests used by the Times Top 100 graduate employers was also conducted.FindingsStudents tended to misjudge how often selection tests were used by employers, and generally lacked experience with these tests. Students' confidence in completing each test varied as a function of the selection test; however, prior experience with these tests positively predicted confidence. Additionally, over 70% of students reported a desire for further information about selection tests as part of their degree.Practical implicationsThese novel findings suggest that students could benefit from further information about selection tests as part of their degree programme which would be of benefit to both students and universities.Originality/valueThese findings are, to the authors knowledge, the first to explicitly assess second- and third-year undergraduate students' knowledge, experience and confidence with popular graduate employer selection tests and demonstrate that students would like more information about these tests on their programme.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education + Training\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education + Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/et-05-2022-0188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education + Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/et-05-2022-0188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在考察大学生对流行的毕业生雇主选拔测试的了解程度、信心和经验。设计/方法/途径为了从本科生中收集足够数量的定量回答,我们进行了一项横向自我报告调查。共有 241 名学生完成了调查,其中大部分是斯旺西大学的心理学学生。调查研究了四个关键变量:(1) 学生的经历;(2) 信心;(3) 对选拔测试的了解;(4) 学生希望获得更多有关选拔测试的信息,并将其作为学位课程的一部分。此外,还对《泰晤士报》百强毕业生雇主所使用的选拔测试进行了审核。研究结果学生往往错误地判断了雇主使用选拔测试的频率,而且普遍缺乏使用这些测试的经验。学生对完成每项测试的信心随选拔测试的不同而变化;但是,以往的测试经验对信心有积极的预测作用。原创性/价值据作者所知,这些研究结果是首次明确评估二年级和三年级本科生对流行的毕业生雇主选拔测试的了解、经验和信心,并表明学生希望在他们的课程中获得更多有关这些测试的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
University students' perceptions of graduate employer selection tests
PurposeThe purpose of the current study was to examine university students' knowledge, confidence and experience of popular graduate employer selection tests.Design/methodology/approachA cross-sectional self-report survey was administered to gather a sufficient number of quantitative responses from undergraduate students. A total of 241 students completed the survey with most of them being psychology students from Swansea University. Four key variables were examined: (1) students' experience, (2) confidence and (3) knowledge of selection tests and (4) their desire for more information about selection tests as part of their degree. An audit of selection tests used by the Times Top 100 graduate employers was also conducted.FindingsStudents tended to misjudge how often selection tests were used by employers, and generally lacked experience with these tests. Students' confidence in completing each test varied as a function of the selection test; however, prior experience with these tests positively predicted confidence. Additionally, over 70% of students reported a desire for further information about selection tests as part of their degree.Practical implicationsThese novel findings suggest that students could benefit from further information about selection tests as part of their degree programme which would be of benefit to both students and universities.Originality/valueThese findings are, to the authors knowledge, the first to explicitly assess second- and third-year undergraduate students' knowledge, experience and confidence with popular graduate employer selection tests and demonstrate that students would like more information about these tests on their programme.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Innovation and sustainability from the perspective of entrepreneurial intention: a cross-cultural approach Innovation and sustainability from the perspective of entrepreneurial intention: a cross-cultural approach Students’ first professional placement: unravelling expectations and realities Variety of entrepreneurial skills measured in the entrepreneurship education literature The role of training in the “school-to-work” transition in the Russian labour market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1