循环经济在行动:在建筑项目中应用含回收成分的产品--多案例研究法

IF 3.5 Q3 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Smart and Sustainable Built Environment Pub Date : 2023-11-28 DOI:10.1108/sasbe-08-2023-0213
S. Shooshtarian, T. Maqsood, Peter S. P. Wong, S. Caldera, Tim Ryley, Atiq Zaman, Ana María Cáceres Ruiz
{"title":"循环经济在行动:在建筑项目中应用含回收成分的产品--多案例研究法","authors":"S. Shooshtarian, T. Maqsood, Peter S. P. Wong, S. Caldera, Tim Ryley, Atiq Zaman, Ana María Cáceres Ruiz","doi":"10.1108/sasbe-08-2023-0213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe utilisation of products with recycled content (PwRC) in construction projects has been identified as a targeted way to achieve sustainable management of construction and demolition waste resources. However, sustainable applications of these resources are subject to a wide array of factors that demand a thorough investigation. This study, therefore, explores the motivations, barriers and strategies for optimal PwRC uptake using a multiple-case study approach.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopted an interpretive multiple-case study approach. The case studies were selected from recently completed construction projects including two infrastructure projects, one commercial project and one residential project. A series of semi-structured interviews were carried out to collect the data. For each case study, four participants were interviewed; these participants represented design, client, supply and building teams.FindingsThe study revealed the main barriers, motivations and opportunities for adoption of PwRC resources in four construction projects. These factors are believed to influence the utilisation of PwRC to varying extents and/or in diverse ways. The findings also suggest that there is a significant opportunity for stakeholders to adopt more sustainable waste management practices, and the use of institutional drivers can help achieve this goal.Research limitations/implicationsThe primary research contribution of the study lies in proposing three key research directions: investigating regulatory constraints impacting the use of PwRC, addressing supply chain challenges and enhancing quality assurance.Originality/valueThe research has a practical contribution to the industry through a suite of actionable strategies to increase the uptake of PwRC. The strategies are mostly focussed on stakeholders' education, the regulation that supports PwRC and project management planning. The two major motivations – referring to two of the three pillars of sustainability (economy and environment) – provide a basis for organisational changes to ensure achieving sustainability in construction activities.","PeriodicalId":45779,"journal":{"name":"Smart and Sustainable Built Environment","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Circular economy in action: the application of products with recycled content in construction projects – a multiple case study approach\",\"authors\":\"S. Shooshtarian, T. Maqsood, Peter S. P. Wong, S. Caldera, Tim Ryley, Atiq Zaman, Ana María Cáceres Ruiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/sasbe-08-2023-0213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe utilisation of products with recycled content (PwRC) in construction projects has been identified as a targeted way to achieve sustainable management of construction and demolition waste resources. However, sustainable applications of these resources are subject to a wide array of factors that demand a thorough investigation. This study, therefore, explores the motivations, barriers and strategies for optimal PwRC uptake using a multiple-case study approach.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopted an interpretive multiple-case study approach. The case studies were selected from recently completed construction projects including two infrastructure projects, one commercial project and one residential project. A series of semi-structured interviews were carried out to collect the data. For each case study, four participants were interviewed; these participants represented design, client, supply and building teams.FindingsThe study revealed the main barriers, motivations and opportunities for adoption of PwRC resources in four construction projects. These factors are believed to influence the utilisation of PwRC to varying extents and/or in diverse ways. The findings also suggest that there is a significant opportunity for stakeholders to adopt more sustainable waste management practices, and the use of institutional drivers can help achieve this goal.Research limitations/implicationsThe primary research contribution of the study lies in proposing three key research directions: investigating regulatory constraints impacting the use of PwRC, addressing supply chain challenges and enhancing quality assurance.Originality/valueThe research has a practical contribution to the industry through a suite of actionable strategies to increase the uptake of PwRC. The strategies are mostly focussed on stakeholders' education, the regulation that supports PwRC and project management planning. The two major motivations – referring to two of the three pillars of sustainability (economy and environment) – provide a basis for organisational changes to ensure achieving sustainability in construction activities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Smart and Sustainable Built Environment\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Smart and Sustainable Built Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-08-2023-0213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart and Sustainable Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-08-2023-0213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 在建筑项目中使用含回收成分的产品(PwRC)已被确定为实现建筑和拆除废物资源可持续管理的一种有针对性的方法。然而,这些资源的可持续应用受到一系列因素的制约,需要进行深入研究。因此,本研究采用多案例研究法,探讨了最佳利用 PwRC 的动机、障碍和策略。案例研究选自近期完成的建筑项目,包括两个基础设施项目、一个商业项目和一个住宅项目。为收集数据,进行了一系列半结构化访谈。研究结果该研究揭示了在四个建筑项目中采用 PwRC 资源的主要障碍、动机和机遇。这些因素被认为会在不同程度上和/或以不同方式影响 PwRC 的使用。研究结果还表明,利益相关者有很大的机会采用更可持续的废物管理方法,而利用制度驱动力可以帮助实现这一目标。研究局限性/影响本研究的主要研究贡献在于提出了三个关键的研究方向:调查影响 PwRC 使用的监管限制、应对供应链挑战以及加强质量保证。这些策略主要集中在利益相关者的教育、支持 PwRC 的法规和项目管理规划方面。两个主要动机涉及可持续发展三大支柱中的两大支柱(经济和环境),为组织变革提供了基础,以确保实现建筑活动的可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Circular economy in action: the application of products with recycled content in construction projects – a multiple case study approach
PurposeThe utilisation of products with recycled content (PwRC) in construction projects has been identified as a targeted way to achieve sustainable management of construction and demolition waste resources. However, sustainable applications of these resources are subject to a wide array of factors that demand a thorough investigation. This study, therefore, explores the motivations, barriers and strategies for optimal PwRC uptake using a multiple-case study approach.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopted an interpretive multiple-case study approach. The case studies were selected from recently completed construction projects including two infrastructure projects, one commercial project and one residential project. A series of semi-structured interviews were carried out to collect the data. For each case study, four participants were interviewed; these participants represented design, client, supply and building teams.FindingsThe study revealed the main barriers, motivations and opportunities for adoption of PwRC resources in four construction projects. These factors are believed to influence the utilisation of PwRC to varying extents and/or in diverse ways. The findings also suggest that there is a significant opportunity for stakeholders to adopt more sustainable waste management practices, and the use of institutional drivers can help achieve this goal.Research limitations/implicationsThe primary research contribution of the study lies in proposing three key research directions: investigating regulatory constraints impacting the use of PwRC, addressing supply chain challenges and enhancing quality assurance.Originality/valueThe research has a practical contribution to the industry through a suite of actionable strategies to increase the uptake of PwRC. The strategies are mostly focussed on stakeholders' education, the regulation that supports PwRC and project management planning. The two major motivations – referring to two of the three pillars of sustainability (economy and environment) – provide a basis for organisational changes to ensure achieving sustainability in construction activities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Smart personal protective equipment for intelligent construction safety monitoring The smart city conundrum: technology, privacy, and the quest for convenience An exploratory study on the benefits of transit orientated development (TOD) to rail infrastructure projects Augmenting the cities’ and metropolitan regional demands for mega rail infrastructure: the application of SWOT and factor analysis Development of an ontology-based asset information model for predictive maintenance in building facilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1