塞马琅无烟区实施的漫长而曲折之路

Novia Handayani, B. Widjanarko, Kusyogo Cahyo, A. Ahsan, Dian Kusuma
{"title":"塞马琅无烟区实施的漫长而曲折之路","authors":"Novia Handayani, B. Widjanarko, Kusyogo Cahyo, A. Ahsan, Dian Kusuma","doi":"10.20473/jaki.v11i2.2023.242-251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Tobacco-Free Areas (TFA) policy is an effective way to control the negative effects of smoking on the community, especially passive smokers. Semarang has had a TFA policy since 2013. However, some people still smoke freely in some areas, such as workplaces, kindergartens, and other public places. Aims: Identifying the implementation of Semarang City Local Government Regulation Number 3 of 2013 concerning Tobacco-Free Areas. Methods: This was qualitative research using the case study method. Data were collected using in-depth interviews with some key informants according to the inclusion criteria. Triangulation was conducted through observation and in-depth interviews with some informants. Data were analyzed using content analysis. Results: Some violations still occurred, mostly at the workplace and educational places, including government offices and schools. Violations happened due to inadequate support of the office’s heads, insufficient workers and the society’s awareness, policy rejection, inadequate financial support, lack of media exposure, and obscurity of the regulation articles, which led to misinterpretation. For example, Article 7, verse 3 states that the TFA regulation will be regulated by the mayor's decree. This statement weakens the regulation itself since the mayor's decree is not as strong as the local regulation. Conclusion: The implementation of Semarang City Local Government Regulation Number 3 of 2013 concerning Tobacco-Free Areas has not been carried out properly in all of the TFA areas. Violations were still found in many areas. Keywords: regulation, secondhand smokers, smoking, tobacco-free areas","PeriodicalId":32968,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A LONG AND WINDING ROAD OF THE TOBACCO-FREE AREAS IMPLEMENTATION IN SEMARANG\",\"authors\":\"Novia Handayani, B. Widjanarko, Kusyogo Cahyo, A. Ahsan, Dian Kusuma\",\"doi\":\"10.20473/jaki.v11i2.2023.242-251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The Tobacco-Free Areas (TFA) policy is an effective way to control the negative effects of smoking on the community, especially passive smokers. Semarang has had a TFA policy since 2013. However, some people still smoke freely in some areas, such as workplaces, kindergartens, and other public places. Aims: Identifying the implementation of Semarang City Local Government Regulation Number 3 of 2013 concerning Tobacco-Free Areas. Methods: This was qualitative research using the case study method. Data were collected using in-depth interviews with some key informants according to the inclusion criteria. Triangulation was conducted through observation and in-depth interviews with some informants. Data were analyzed using content analysis. Results: Some violations still occurred, mostly at the workplace and educational places, including government offices and schools. Violations happened due to inadequate support of the office’s heads, insufficient workers and the society’s awareness, policy rejection, inadequate financial support, lack of media exposure, and obscurity of the regulation articles, which led to misinterpretation. For example, Article 7, verse 3 states that the TFA regulation will be regulated by the mayor's decree. This statement weakens the regulation itself since the mayor's decree is not as strong as the local regulation. Conclusion: The implementation of Semarang City Local Government Regulation Number 3 of 2013 concerning Tobacco-Free Areas has not been carried out properly in all of the TFA areas. Violations were still found in many areas. Keywords: regulation, secondhand smokers, smoking, tobacco-free areas\",\"PeriodicalId\":32968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20473/jaki.v11i2.2023.242-251\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/jaki.v11i2.2023.242-251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:无烟区(TFA)政策是控制吸烟对社区(尤其是被动吸烟者)造成负面影响的有效方法。三宝垄自 2013 年起开始实施无烟区政策。然而,仍有一些人在工作场所、幼儿园等公共场所随意吸烟。目的:了解三宝垄市地方政府 2013 年第 3 号无烟区条例的实施情况。研究方法本研究采用案例研究法进行定性研究。根据纳入标准,通过对一些关键信息提供者进行深入访谈来收集数据。通过观察和对一些信息提供者的深入访谈进行了三角测量。采用内容分析法对数据进行分析。结果:仍然存在一些侵权行为,主要发生在工作场所和教育场所,包括政府办公室和学校。违规行为发生的原因包括:办公室负责人的支持力度不够、工人和社会的认识不足、政策排斥、财政支持不足、媒体曝光不足、法规条款模糊不清导致误读。例如,第 7 条第 3 款规定,TFA 条例将由市长令进行管理。这种说法削弱了条例本身,因为市长令不如地方条例有力。结论三宝垄市地方政府 2013 年第 3 号无烟区条例并没有在所有无烟区得到很好的执行。许多地区仍存在违规行为。关键词:法规、二手烟者、吸烟、无烟区
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A LONG AND WINDING ROAD OF THE TOBACCO-FREE AREAS IMPLEMENTATION IN SEMARANG
Background: The Tobacco-Free Areas (TFA) policy is an effective way to control the negative effects of smoking on the community, especially passive smokers. Semarang has had a TFA policy since 2013. However, some people still smoke freely in some areas, such as workplaces, kindergartens, and other public places. Aims: Identifying the implementation of Semarang City Local Government Regulation Number 3 of 2013 concerning Tobacco-Free Areas. Methods: This was qualitative research using the case study method. Data were collected using in-depth interviews with some key informants according to the inclusion criteria. Triangulation was conducted through observation and in-depth interviews with some informants. Data were analyzed using content analysis. Results: Some violations still occurred, mostly at the workplace and educational places, including government offices and schools. Violations happened due to inadequate support of the office’s heads, insufficient workers and the society’s awareness, policy rejection, inadequate financial support, lack of media exposure, and obscurity of the regulation articles, which led to misinterpretation. For example, Article 7, verse 3 states that the TFA regulation will be regulated by the mayor's decree. This statement weakens the regulation itself since the mayor's decree is not as strong as the local regulation. Conclusion: The implementation of Semarang City Local Government Regulation Number 3 of 2013 concerning Tobacco-Free Areas has not been carried out properly in all of the TFA areas. Violations were still found in many areas. Keywords: regulation, secondhand smokers, smoking, tobacco-free areas
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
VACCINATION ATTITUDE AMONG HEALTHCARE WORKERS AT THE EARLY PHASE OF COVID-19 IN MALAYSIA SEVERAL PILLARS OF HEALTH TRANSFORMATION IN INDONESIA: FROM RESILIENCE PHARMACEUTICAL SUPPLY, HEALTH INSURANCE, PRIMARY HEATH CARE, TO DIGITAL HEALTH HAS INCLUSIVE HEALTH ACCESS IN JAKARTA'S PUBLIC HEALTH CENTER BEEN FULFILLED? DETERMINE THE TARGET TO INCREASE PRIMARY HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION IN INDONESIA'S DISADVANTAGED AREAS EARLY STRESS DETECTION DURING PREGNANCY USING E-HEALTH IN THE PANDEMIC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1