尼日利亚刑事司法中还押程序的法律问题

Aliyu Aliyu Imam, Idris Baba Mohammed
{"title":"尼日利亚刑事司法中还押程序的法律问题","authors":"Aliyu Aliyu Imam, Idris Baba Mohammed","doi":"10.53982/alj.2023.1101.04-j","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Administration of Criminal Justice Laws in Nigeria that replaced the Criminal Procedure Code and the Criminal Procedure Act has brought “Remand Proceeding” as part of her innovation. This however appears in all regard as legislating and legalising the condemned “Holding Charge”. This innovative provision was greeted with heated disdain, disapproval and unwelcome criticism. It is seen as unconstitutional and contrary to the policy of criminal litigation procedure. It was held to have usurp the right to personal liberty, dignity and fair hearing of an accused defendant whose remand order will be handed down based on anex-parte application. This discourse investigates these assertions based on the principles and laws governing criminal litigation in Nigeria. The objective is to determine the significance velnon of the Remand Proceeding and its constitutionality. This piece founds that, the provisions dealing with remand proceedings are complementary to the constitution and serves the need of criminal litigation to curb the excesses of the prosecuting authorities. The significance therefore outweighs the perceived disadvantages of the procedure.","PeriodicalId":123596,"journal":{"name":"ABUAD Law Journal","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Issues in Remand Proceedings under the Administration of Criminal Justice in Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"Aliyu Aliyu Imam, Idris Baba Mohammed\",\"doi\":\"10.53982/alj.2023.1101.04-j\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Administration of Criminal Justice Laws in Nigeria that replaced the Criminal Procedure Code and the Criminal Procedure Act has brought “Remand Proceeding” as part of her innovation. This however appears in all regard as legislating and legalising the condemned “Holding Charge”. This innovative provision was greeted with heated disdain, disapproval and unwelcome criticism. It is seen as unconstitutional and contrary to the policy of criminal litigation procedure. It was held to have usurp the right to personal liberty, dignity and fair hearing of an accused defendant whose remand order will be handed down based on anex-parte application. This discourse investigates these assertions based on the principles and laws governing criminal litigation in Nigeria. The objective is to determine the significance velnon of the Remand Proceeding and its constitutionality. This piece founds that, the provisions dealing with remand proceedings are complementary to the constitution and serves the need of criminal litigation to curb the excesses of the prosecuting authorities. The significance therefore outweighs the perceived disadvantages of the procedure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ABUAD Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ABUAD Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53982/alj.2023.1101.04-j\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABUAD Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53982/alj.2023.1101.04-j","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尼日利亚的《刑事司法管理法》取代了《刑事诉讼法》和《刑事诉讼法》,将 "还押诉讼 "作为其创新的一部分。然而,从各方面来看,这似乎是将受到谴责的 "扣押指控 "立法化和合法化。这一创新条款遭到了强烈的鄙视、反对和不受欢迎的批评。它被视为违宪,违背了刑事诉讼程序的政策。它被认为侵占了被告的人身自由权、尊严权和公平听证权,而被告的还押令是根据单方面申请下达的。本论文根据尼日利亚刑事诉讼的原则和法律对这些论断进行了研究。目的是确定还押程序的重要性及其合宪性。本文认为,有关还押诉讼的规定是对宪法的补充,符合刑事诉讼的需要,可以遏制检察机关的过激行为。因此,其重要性超过了该程序被认为存在的弊端。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Legal Issues in Remand Proceedings under the Administration of Criminal Justice in Nigeria
The Administration of Criminal Justice Laws in Nigeria that replaced the Criminal Procedure Code and the Criminal Procedure Act has brought “Remand Proceeding” as part of her innovation. This however appears in all regard as legislating and legalising the condemned “Holding Charge”. This innovative provision was greeted with heated disdain, disapproval and unwelcome criticism. It is seen as unconstitutional and contrary to the policy of criminal litigation procedure. It was held to have usurp the right to personal liberty, dignity and fair hearing of an accused defendant whose remand order will be handed down based on anex-parte application. This discourse investigates these assertions based on the principles and laws governing criminal litigation in Nigeria. The objective is to determine the significance velnon of the Remand Proceeding and its constitutionality. This piece founds that, the provisions dealing with remand proceedings are complementary to the constitution and serves the need of criminal litigation to curb the excesses of the prosecuting authorities. The significance therefore outweighs the perceived disadvantages of the procedure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CRYPTO-EXCHANGES IN NIGERIA: A REVIEW OF THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK. THE ROLE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF INNOVATIONS IN REGENERATIVE MEDICINE. NAVIGATING THE FUTURE: ROBO-ADVISORS IN THE FINANCIAL LANDSCAPE. THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) IN ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY (ART): EXAMINING THE LEGAL AND ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS. EXAMINATION OF THE OWNERSHIP OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE GENERATED DOCUMENTS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1