青年是核心研究者:社会公正意味着青年也是知识的创造者

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL School Psychology International Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI:10.1177/01430343231216978
Elizabeth Benninger, Shereen C. Naser, Sinéad M. O'Neill
{"title":"青年是核心研究者:社会公正意味着青年也是知识的创造者","authors":"Elizabeth Benninger, Shereen C. Naser, Sinéad M. O'Neill","doi":"10.1177/01430343231216978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dominant knowledge systems rely on a Western perspective of creating and disseminating new information. These systems marginalize traditional ways of knowing including co-creating knowledge, personal narratives and lived experiences, as well as inherited cultural knowledge. Additionally, Western knowledge systems have centered the White adult male as the primary knowledge creator both through what has been valued in contemporary scientific traditions and culturally in the image of who is considered capable of creating knowledge. Those who do not fit this image have historically been marginalized and exploited in the pursuit of knowledge making including youth and particularly youth with diverse racial/ethnic identities. It is these narrow epistemological systems that have informed school psychology research and practice since its inception. Recent calls for social justice as central to school psychology work have challenged the status quo and emphasized the amplification of marginalized voices in research and practice. Therefore, this article outlines methodologies that subvert more traditional knowledge-making strategies foundational to school psychology work and critiques these to provide guidelines for methodologies that can truly incorporate youth as co-researchers, particularly Black, Indigenous and youth of color within a US context. A case study illustrating the implementation of these guidelines is included.","PeriodicalId":47723,"journal":{"name":"School Psychology International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Youth as coresearchers: Social justice means youth as knowledge makers too\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Benninger, Shereen C. Naser, Sinéad M. O'Neill\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01430343231216978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dominant knowledge systems rely on a Western perspective of creating and disseminating new information. These systems marginalize traditional ways of knowing including co-creating knowledge, personal narratives and lived experiences, as well as inherited cultural knowledge. Additionally, Western knowledge systems have centered the White adult male as the primary knowledge creator both through what has been valued in contemporary scientific traditions and culturally in the image of who is considered capable of creating knowledge. Those who do not fit this image have historically been marginalized and exploited in the pursuit of knowledge making including youth and particularly youth with diverse racial/ethnic identities. It is these narrow epistemological systems that have informed school psychology research and practice since its inception. Recent calls for social justice as central to school psychology work have challenged the status quo and emphasized the amplification of marginalized voices in research and practice. Therefore, this article outlines methodologies that subvert more traditional knowledge-making strategies foundational to school psychology work and critiques these to provide guidelines for methodologies that can truly incorporate youth as co-researchers, particularly Black, Indigenous and youth of color within a US context. A case study illustrating the implementation of these guidelines is included.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School Psychology International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School Psychology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01430343231216978\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Psychology International","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01430343231216978","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

占主导地位的知识体系依赖于西方创造和传播新信息的视角。这些体系排斥传统的认知方式,包括共同创造知识、个人叙事和生活经验,以及继承的文化知识。此外,西方知识体系将白人成年男性作为主要的知识创造者,这既体现在当代科学传统的价值上,也体现在被认为有能力创造知识的文化形象上。那些不符合这一形象的人历来在追求知识创造的过程中被边缘化和剥削,包括青年,特别是具有不同种族/民族身份的青年。正是这些狭隘的认识论体系从一开始就影响着学校心理学的研究和实践。最近,将社会公正作为学校心理学工作核心的呼声对现状提出了挑战,并强调在研究和实践中放大边缘化的声音。因此,本文概述了颠覆学校心理学工作中更多传统知识创造策略的方法论,并对这些方法论进行了批判,从而为能够真正将青少年,尤其是美国背景下的黑人、土著和有色人种青少年纳入共同研究者的方法论提供指导。本报告还包括一个案例研究,说明这些指导原则的实施情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Youth as coresearchers: Social justice means youth as knowledge makers too
Dominant knowledge systems rely on a Western perspective of creating and disseminating new information. These systems marginalize traditional ways of knowing including co-creating knowledge, personal narratives and lived experiences, as well as inherited cultural knowledge. Additionally, Western knowledge systems have centered the White adult male as the primary knowledge creator both through what has been valued in contemporary scientific traditions and culturally in the image of who is considered capable of creating knowledge. Those who do not fit this image have historically been marginalized and exploited in the pursuit of knowledge making including youth and particularly youth with diverse racial/ethnic identities. It is these narrow epistemological systems that have informed school psychology research and practice since its inception. Recent calls for social justice as central to school psychology work have challenged the status quo and emphasized the amplification of marginalized voices in research and practice. Therefore, this article outlines methodologies that subvert more traditional knowledge-making strategies foundational to school psychology work and critiques these to provide guidelines for methodologies that can truly incorporate youth as co-researchers, particularly Black, Indigenous and youth of color within a US context. A case study illustrating the implementation of these guidelines is included.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
School Psychology International
School Psychology International PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The official publication of the ISPA. School Psychology International highlights the concerns of those who provide quality mental health, educational, therapeutic and support services to schools and their communities throughout the world. The Journal publishes a wide range of original empirical research, cross-cultural replications of promising procedures and descriptions of technology transfer
期刊最新文献
“It takes a village”: An ecological analysis of social and emotional learning environments in Malawi Measuring teacher-student relationships among children with emotional and behavioral problems Provision of educational psychological services under a high inflationary environment in Masvingo Province, Zimbabwe The role of teachers’ social and emotional competence in implementing social and emotional learning (SEL) curriculum in Malawi Ostracism, school engagement, and academic achievement: Examining a mediation model among senior high school students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1