在极端事件中,NFT、DeFi 和碳配额之间是否存在联系?

IF 9 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE China Finance Review International Pub Date : 2023-11-23 DOI:10.1108/cfri-03-2023-0057
Bikramaditya Ghosh, Mariya Gubareva, Noshaba Zulfiqar, A. Bossman
{"title":"在极端事件中,NFT、DeFi 和碳配额之间是否存在联系?","authors":"Bikramaditya Ghosh, Mariya Gubareva, Noshaba Zulfiqar, A. Bossman","doi":"10.1108/cfri-03-2023-0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe authors target the interrelationships between non-fungible tokens (NFTs), decentralized finance (DeFi) and carbon allowances (CA) markets during 2021–2023. The recent shift of crypto and DeFi miners from China (the People's Republic of China, PRC) green hydro energy to dirty fuel energies elsewhere induces investments in carbon offsetting instruments; this is a backdrop to the authors’ investigation.Design/methodology/approachThe quantile vector autoregression (VAR) approach is employed to examine extreme-quantile-connectedness and spillovers among the NFT Index (NFTI), DeFi Pulse Index (DPI), KraneShares Global Carbon Strategy ETF price (KRBN) and the Solactive Carbon Emission Allowances Rolling Futures Total Return Index (SOLCARBT).FindingsAt bull markets, DPI is the only consistent net shock transmitter as NFTI transmits innovations only at the most extreme quantile. At bear markets, KRBN and SOLCARBT are net shock transmitters, while NFTI is the only consistent net shock receiver. The receiver-transmitter roles change as a function of the market conditions. The increases in the relative tail dependence correspond to the stress events, which make systemic connectedness augment, turning market-specific idiosyncratic considerations less relevant.Originality/valueThe shift of digital asset miners from the PRC has resulted in excessive fuel energy consumption and aggravated environmental consequences regarding NFTs and DeFi mining. Although there exist numerous studies dedicated to CA trading and its role in carbon print reduction, the direct nexus between NFT, DeFi and CA has never been addressed in the literature. The originality of the authors’ research consists in bridging this void. Results are valuable for portfolio managers in bull and bear markets, as the authors show that connectedness is more intense under such conditions.","PeriodicalId":44440,"journal":{"name":"China Finance Review International","volume":"141 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is there a nexus between NFT, DeFi and carbon allowances during extreme events?\",\"authors\":\"Bikramaditya Ghosh, Mariya Gubareva, Noshaba Zulfiqar, A. Bossman\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/cfri-03-2023-0057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe authors target the interrelationships between non-fungible tokens (NFTs), decentralized finance (DeFi) and carbon allowances (CA) markets during 2021–2023. The recent shift of crypto and DeFi miners from China (the People's Republic of China, PRC) green hydro energy to dirty fuel energies elsewhere induces investments in carbon offsetting instruments; this is a backdrop to the authors’ investigation.Design/methodology/approachThe quantile vector autoregression (VAR) approach is employed to examine extreme-quantile-connectedness and spillovers among the NFT Index (NFTI), DeFi Pulse Index (DPI), KraneShares Global Carbon Strategy ETF price (KRBN) and the Solactive Carbon Emission Allowances Rolling Futures Total Return Index (SOLCARBT).FindingsAt bull markets, DPI is the only consistent net shock transmitter as NFTI transmits innovations only at the most extreme quantile. At bear markets, KRBN and SOLCARBT are net shock transmitters, while NFTI is the only consistent net shock receiver. The receiver-transmitter roles change as a function of the market conditions. The increases in the relative tail dependence correspond to the stress events, which make systemic connectedness augment, turning market-specific idiosyncratic considerations less relevant.Originality/valueThe shift of digital asset miners from the PRC has resulted in excessive fuel energy consumption and aggravated environmental consequences regarding NFTs and DeFi mining. Although there exist numerous studies dedicated to CA trading and its role in carbon print reduction, the direct nexus between NFT, DeFi and CA has never been addressed in the literature. The originality of the authors’ research consists in bridging this void. Results are valuable for portfolio managers in bull and bear markets, as the authors show that connectedness is more intense under such conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China Finance Review International\",\"volume\":\"141 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China Finance Review International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/cfri-03-2023-0057\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Finance Review International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cfri-03-2023-0057","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 作者以 2021-2023 年期间不可兑换代币(NFT)、去中心化金融(DeFi)和碳配额(CA)市场之间的相互关系为目标。最近,加密货币和去中心化金融(DeFi)矿工从中国(中华人民共和国,PRC)的绿色水电能源转向其他地方的肮脏燃料能源,诱发了对碳抵消工具的投资;这是作者调查的背景。设计/方法/途径采用量值向量自回归(VAR)方法研究了NFT指数(NFTI)、DeFi脉冲指数(DPI)、KraneShares全球碳策略ETF价格(KRBN)和Solactive碳排放配额滚动期货总收益指数(SOLCARBT)之间的极端量值关联性和溢出效应。在熊市中,KRBN 和 SOLCARBT 是净冲击传播者,而 NFTI 则是唯一一致的净冲击接收者。接收器-发射器角色随市场条件而变化。相对尾部依赖性的增加与压力事件相对应,压力事件使系统关联性增强,从而使特定市场的特异性考虑因素变得不那么重要。 原创性/价值数字资产矿工从中国的转移导致了过度的燃料能源消耗,并加剧了 NFT 和 DeFi 采矿的环境后果。尽管已有大量研究致力于 CA 交易及其在减少碳排放中的作用,但文献中从未涉及 NFT、DeFi 和 CA 之间的直接联系。作者研究的独创性在于填补了这一空白。研究结果对牛市和熊市中的投资组合经理都很有价值,因为作者发现,在牛市和熊市中,关联性更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is there a nexus between NFT, DeFi and carbon allowances during extreme events?
PurposeThe authors target the interrelationships between non-fungible tokens (NFTs), decentralized finance (DeFi) and carbon allowances (CA) markets during 2021–2023. The recent shift of crypto and DeFi miners from China (the People's Republic of China, PRC) green hydro energy to dirty fuel energies elsewhere induces investments in carbon offsetting instruments; this is a backdrop to the authors’ investigation.Design/methodology/approachThe quantile vector autoregression (VAR) approach is employed to examine extreme-quantile-connectedness and spillovers among the NFT Index (NFTI), DeFi Pulse Index (DPI), KraneShares Global Carbon Strategy ETF price (KRBN) and the Solactive Carbon Emission Allowances Rolling Futures Total Return Index (SOLCARBT).FindingsAt bull markets, DPI is the only consistent net shock transmitter as NFTI transmits innovations only at the most extreme quantile. At bear markets, KRBN and SOLCARBT are net shock transmitters, while NFTI is the only consistent net shock receiver. The receiver-transmitter roles change as a function of the market conditions. The increases in the relative tail dependence correspond to the stress events, which make systemic connectedness augment, turning market-specific idiosyncratic considerations less relevant.Originality/valueThe shift of digital asset miners from the PRC has resulted in excessive fuel energy consumption and aggravated environmental consequences regarding NFTs and DeFi mining. Although there exist numerous studies dedicated to CA trading and its role in carbon print reduction, the direct nexus between NFT, DeFi and CA has never been addressed in the literature. The originality of the authors’ research consists in bridging this void. Results are valuable for portfolio managers in bull and bear markets, as the authors show that connectedness is more intense under such conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
1.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: China Finance Review International publishes original and high-quality theoretical and empirical articles focusing on financial and economic issues arising from China's reform, opening-up, economic development, and system transformation. The journal serves as a platform for exchange between Chinese finance scholars and international financial economists, covering a wide range of topics including monetary policy, banking, international trade and finance, corporate finance, asset pricing, market microstructure, corporate governance, incentive studies, fiscal policy, public management, and state-owned enterprise reform.
期刊最新文献
The valuation demand for accounting conservatism: evidence from firm-level climate risk measures Who gains favor with green investors amidst climate risk? Do green economy stocks matter for the carbon and energy markets? Evidence of connectedness effects and hedging strategies Exploring interconnections and risk evaluation of green equities and bonds: fresh perspectives from TVP-VAR model and wavelet-based VaR analysis Unraveling the relationship between sustainability and returns: a multi-attribute utility analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1