用于设计在现有建筑物中加装粘性阻尼器的 "直接五步法":制定和案例研究

IF 2.2 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Frontiers in Built Environment Pub Date : 2023-11-23 DOI:10.3389/fbuil.2023.1289851
Matteo Marra, Michele Palermo, Stefano Silvestri
{"title":"用于设计在现有建筑物中加装粘性阻尼器的 \"直接五步法\":制定和案例研究","authors":"Matteo Marra, Michele Palermo, Stefano Silvestri","doi":"10.3389/fbuil.2023.1289851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper introduces an updated formulation of a five-step procedure dealing with the design of fluid viscous dampers for the seismic retrofitting of existing frame buildings. The original design procedure is known as the “direct five-step procedure,” and is articulated into 5 consecutive steps guiding the designer from the identification of the expected seismic performances, to the sizing of the added viscous dampers up to the final verification of the seismic behavior through non-linear dynamic time history analyses. The procedure leads to the full definition of the mechanical characteristics of the commercial non-linear viscous dampers and allows to estimate the maximum dissipative forces acting in the dampers and the internal forces in the frame members. The objective of the design procedure, when applied to a new building, is to size the dampers in order to keep the structural elements within the linear elastic range considering a “rare” earthquake design level. However, when dealing with an existing building, especially if originally designed considering vertical loads only, the insertion of viscous dampers could be not sufficient to keep the structural elements in the elastic range. Thus, it might be necessary to accept local plastic excursion of the structural elements, by taking into account the ductility capacity (albeit probably limited) of the structural members (hysteretic dissipation associated with damage in beams and columns). This latter aspect is explicitly considered in the updated formulation of the “direct five-step procedure” presented here through the introduction of an overall response reduction factor accounting for both the ductility capacity of the structural members and the viscous damping provided by the added dampers. The design procedure is then applied to a 11-storey frame structure case study, which is representative of reinforced concrete buildings designed for vertical loads only. Three different retrofitting design strategies are considered, based on different exploitation of viscous energy dissipation provided by the dampers and hysteretic energy dissipation due to the excursion of the structural members into the inelastic regime.","PeriodicalId":37112,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Built Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The “direct five-step procedure” for the design of added viscous dampers to be inserted into existing buildings: formulation and case study\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Marra, Michele Palermo, Stefano Silvestri\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fbuil.2023.1289851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper introduces an updated formulation of a five-step procedure dealing with the design of fluid viscous dampers for the seismic retrofitting of existing frame buildings. The original design procedure is known as the “direct five-step procedure,” and is articulated into 5 consecutive steps guiding the designer from the identification of the expected seismic performances, to the sizing of the added viscous dampers up to the final verification of the seismic behavior through non-linear dynamic time history analyses. The procedure leads to the full definition of the mechanical characteristics of the commercial non-linear viscous dampers and allows to estimate the maximum dissipative forces acting in the dampers and the internal forces in the frame members. The objective of the design procedure, when applied to a new building, is to size the dampers in order to keep the structural elements within the linear elastic range considering a “rare” earthquake design level. However, when dealing with an existing building, especially if originally designed considering vertical loads only, the insertion of viscous dampers could be not sufficient to keep the structural elements in the elastic range. Thus, it might be necessary to accept local plastic excursion of the structural elements, by taking into account the ductility capacity (albeit probably limited) of the structural members (hysteretic dissipation associated with damage in beams and columns). This latter aspect is explicitly considered in the updated formulation of the “direct five-step procedure” presented here through the introduction of an overall response reduction factor accounting for both the ductility capacity of the structural members and the viscous damping provided by the added dampers. The design procedure is then applied to a 11-storey frame structure case study, which is representative of reinforced concrete buildings designed for vertical loads only. Three different retrofitting design strategies are considered, based on different exploitation of viscous energy dissipation provided by the dampers and hysteretic energy dissipation due to the excursion of the structural members into the inelastic regime.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Built Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Built Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2023.1289851\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2023.1289851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了在现有框架结构建筑抗震改造中流体粘性阻尼器设计五步程序的最新表述。最初的设计程序被称为 "直接五步程序",分为 5 个连续步骤,指导设计人员从确定预期抗震性能到确定添加的粘性阻尼器的尺寸,直至通过非线性动态时间历程分析对抗震行为进行最终验证。该程序可全面定义商用非线性粘性阻尼器的机械特性,并估算出作用在阻尼器上的最大耗散力和框架构件的内力。当应用于新建筑时,设计程序的目标是确定阻尼器的大小,以便在考虑到 "罕见 "地震设计水平的情况下,将结构部件保持在线性弹性范围内。然而,在处理现有建筑物时,尤其是在最初设计时只考虑垂直荷载的情况下,插入粘性阻尼器可能不足以将结构元件保持在弹性范围内。因此,可能有必要通过考虑结构构件的延展能力(尽管可能有限)(与梁柱损坏相关的滞后耗散)来接受结构构件的局部塑性偏移。在本文介绍的 "直接五步程序 "的最新表述中,通过引入同时考虑结构构件的延展能力和添加阻尼器所提供的粘性阻尼的总体响应降低系数,明确考虑了后一方面。然后将设计程序应用于一个 11 层框架结构案例研究,该案例研究是钢筋混凝土建筑的代表,其设计仅适用于垂直荷载。考虑了三种不同的改造设计策略,分别基于对阻尼器提供的粘性能量耗散和结构构件进入非弹性状态时产生的滞后能量耗散的不同利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The “direct five-step procedure” for the design of added viscous dampers to be inserted into existing buildings: formulation and case study
This paper introduces an updated formulation of a five-step procedure dealing with the design of fluid viscous dampers for the seismic retrofitting of existing frame buildings. The original design procedure is known as the “direct five-step procedure,” and is articulated into 5 consecutive steps guiding the designer from the identification of the expected seismic performances, to the sizing of the added viscous dampers up to the final verification of the seismic behavior through non-linear dynamic time history analyses. The procedure leads to the full definition of the mechanical characteristics of the commercial non-linear viscous dampers and allows to estimate the maximum dissipative forces acting in the dampers and the internal forces in the frame members. The objective of the design procedure, when applied to a new building, is to size the dampers in order to keep the structural elements within the linear elastic range considering a “rare” earthquake design level. However, when dealing with an existing building, especially if originally designed considering vertical loads only, the insertion of viscous dampers could be not sufficient to keep the structural elements in the elastic range. Thus, it might be necessary to accept local plastic excursion of the structural elements, by taking into account the ductility capacity (albeit probably limited) of the structural members (hysteretic dissipation associated with damage in beams and columns). This latter aspect is explicitly considered in the updated formulation of the “direct five-step procedure” presented here through the introduction of an overall response reduction factor accounting for both the ductility capacity of the structural members and the viscous damping provided by the added dampers. The design procedure is then applied to a 11-storey frame structure case study, which is representative of reinforced concrete buildings designed for vertical loads only. Three different retrofitting design strategies are considered, based on different exploitation of viscous energy dissipation provided by the dampers and hysteretic energy dissipation due to the excursion of the structural members into the inelastic regime.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Built Environment
Frontiers in Built Environment Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
266
期刊最新文献
A framework for computer vision for virtual-realistic multi-axial real-time hybrid simulation Reassessment of natural expansive materials and their impact on freeze-thaw cycles in geotechnical engineering: a review Effectiveness of housing design features in malaria prevention: architects’ perspective Numerical studies on low-strain integrity testing of cast-in-place pile Phygital workspace: a systematic review in developing a new typological work environment using XR technology to reduce the carbon footprint
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1