研究羊膜腔内前列腺素 F2 Alpha 与米非司酮和米索前列醇联合用于中期妊娠医学终止的有效性

IF 0.1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Marine Medical Society Pub Date : 2023-11-20 DOI:10.4103/jmms.jmms_78_23
Admiral Anupam NM Kapur, V. S. J. Rao, M. K. Tangri, Reema Kumar Bhatt, Hrishikesh Magdum
{"title":"研究羊膜腔内前列腺素 F2 Alpha 与米非司酮和米索前列醇联合用于中期妊娠医学终止的有效性","authors":"Admiral Anupam NM Kapur, V. S. J. Rao, M. K. Tangri, Reema Kumar Bhatt, Hrishikesh Magdum","doi":"10.4103/jmms.jmms_78_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: This study aims to compare the effectiveness, induction to abortion interval, blood loss, and side effect profile between administration of intraamniotic prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF2a) with a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical termination of pregnancy in mid-trimester. Prospective observational study. The study was conducted by dividing the women with indicated mid-trimester abortions into two groups of 20 women each. Group-I received Tablet Mifepristone 200 mg orally on day 1 and then after 48 h, Tablet Misoprostol 400 mg given per vaginally every 4 h till abortion was completed or a maximum of 5 doses whichever was earlier. Group-II received a single injection of PGF2a (250 mg) intra-amniotically under ultrasonography guidance. Group comparisons were made using t-test/Mann–Whitney U-test for normally/nonnormally distributed continuous data, respectively, and Chi-square test for categorical variables. SPSS version 23 was used for analysis. P < 0.05 was taken as the cut-off for statistical significance. The success rate was 100% in both the groups. There was a significant difference in the mean induction to abortion interval between Group-I, the mean being 12.92 ± 2.68 h compared to Group-II being 33.08 ± 6.35 h (P < 0.001). Group-I had a mean blood loss of 221 ± 55.15 mL, significantly more than Group-II 160 ± 25.13 mL (P < 0.001). Twenty-five percent of the Group-I woman had retained products of conception with none in Group-II (P = 0.029). The pain score was better in Group II (pain score 4.4 vs. 5.7, P < 0.001). Fewer women developed chills in Group II compared to Group I (0% vs. 50%, P < 0.001). PGF2a is equally effective as a combination of Mifepristone and Misoprostol in mid-trimester abortion. Although it has a longer induction to abortion interval, it appears to be better with respect to the completeness of evacuation, lesser blood loss, and better patient tolerance.","PeriodicalId":41773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marine Medical Society","volume":"59 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To Study the Efficacy of Intraamniotic Prostaglandin F2 Alpha versus Mifepristone and Misoprostol Combination for Mid-trimester Medical Termination of Pregnancy\",\"authors\":\"Admiral Anupam NM Kapur, V. S. J. Rao, M. K. Tangri, Reema Kumar Bhatt, Hrishikesh Magdum\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmms.jmms_78_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims: This study aims to compare the effectiveness, induction to abortion interval, blood loss, and side effect profile between administration of intraamniotic prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF2a) with a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical termination of pregnancy in mid-trimester. Prospective observational study. The study was conducted by dividing the women with indicated mid-trimester abortions into two groups of 20 women each. Group-I received Tablet Mifepristone 200 mg orally on day 1 and then after 48 h, Tablet Misoprostol 400 mg given per vaginally every 4 h till abortion was completed or a maximum of 5 doses whichever was earlier. Group-II received a single injection of PGF2a (250 mg) intra-amniotically under ultrasonography guidance. Group comparisons were made using t-test/Mann–Whitney U-test for normally/nonnormally distributed continuous data, respectively, and Chi-square test for categorical variables. SPSS version 23 was used for analysis. P < 0.05 was taken as the cut-off for statistical significance. The success rate was 100% in both the groups. There was a significant difference in the mean induction to abortion interval between Group-I, the mean being 12.92 ± 2.68 h compared to Group-II being 33.08 ± 6.35 h (P < 0.001). Group-I had a mean blood loss of 221 ± 55.15 mL, significantly more than Group-II 160 ± 25.13 mL (P < 0.001). Twenty-five percent of the Group-I woman had retained products of conception with none in Group-II (P = 0.029). The pain score was better in Group II (pain score 4.4 vs. 5.7, P < 0.001). Fewer women developed chills in Group II compared to Group I (0% vs. 50%, P < 0.001). PGF2a is equally effective as a combination of Mifepristone and Misoprostol in mid-trimester abortion. Although it has a longer induction to abortion interval, it appears to be better with respect to the completeness of evacuation, lesser blood loss, and better patient tolerance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marine Medical Society\",\"volume\":\"59 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marine Medical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmms.jmms_78_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marine Medical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmms.jmms_78_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较羊膜腔内注射前列腺素 F2 alpha(PGF2a)与米非司酮和米索前列醇联合用于妊娠中期药物终止妊娠的有效性、从引产到流产的间隔时间、失血量和副作用情况。前瞻性观察研究。 研究将有指征的中期妊娠流产妇女分为两组,每组 20 人。第一组在第 1 天口服米非司酮片 200 毫克,48 小时后每 4 小时阴道注射米索前列醇片 400 毫克,直至流产完成或最多注射 5 次,以时间在前者为准。第二组在超声波引导下,在羊膜腔内注射一次 PGF2a(250 毫克)。对正态/非正态分布的连续数据分别采用 t 检验/曼-惠特尼 U 检验进行分组比较,对分类变量采用卡方检验。分析采用 SPSS 23 版本。统计显著性以 P < 0.05 为界限。 两组的成功率均为 100%。第一组从引产到流产的平均间隔时间为(12.92 ± 2.68)小时,第二组为(33.08 ± 6.35)小时(P < 0.001)。第一组的平均失血量为 221 ± 55.15 毫升,明显高于第二组的 160 ± 25.13 毫升(P < 0.001)。25% 的 I 组妇女有受孕产物残留,而 II 组没有(P = 0.029)。第二组的疼痛评分较好(疼痛评分 4.4 对 5.7,P < 0.001)。与第一组相比,第二组中出现寒颤的女性更少(0% 对 50%,P < 0.001)。 在中期妊娠流产中,PGF2a 与米非司酮和米索前列醇联合用药同样有效。虽然PGF2a从诱导到流产的时间间隔较长,但在排空完整性、失血量和患者耐受性方面似乎更胜一筹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
To Study the Efficacy of Intraamniotic Prostaglandin F2 Alpha versus Mifepristone and Misoprostol Combination for Mid-trimester Medical Termination of Pregnancy
Aims: This study aims to compare the effectiveness, induction to abortion interval, blood loss, and side effect profile between administration of intraamniotic prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF2a) with a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical termination of pregnancy in mid-trimester. Prospective observational study. The study was conducted by dividing the women with indicated mid-trimester abortions into two groups of 20 women each. Group-I received Tablet Mifepristone 200 mg orally on day 1 and then after 48 h, Tablet Misoprostol 400 mg given per vaginally every 4 h till abortion was completed or a maximum of 5 doses whichever was earlier. Group-II received a single injection of PGF2a (250 mg) intra-amniotically under ultrasonography guidance. Group comparisons were made using t-test/Mann–Whitney U-test for normally/nonnormally distributed continuous data, respectively, and Chi-square test for categorical variables. SPSS version 23 was used for analysis. P < 0.05 was taken as the cut-off for statistical significance. The success rate was 100% in both the groups. There was a significant difference in the mean induction to abortion interval between Group-I, the mean being 12.92 ± 2.68 h compared to Group-II being 33.08 ± 6.35 h (P < 0.001). Group-I had a mean blood loss of 221 ± 55.15 mL, significantly more than Group-II 160 ± 25.13 mL (P < 0.001). Twenty-five percent of the Group-I woman had retained products of conception with none in Group-II (P = 0.029). The pain score was better in Group II (pain score 4.4 vs. 5.7, P < 0.001). Fewer women developed chills in Group II compared to Group I (0% vs. 50%, P < 0.001). PGF2a is equally effective as a combination of Mifepristone and Misoprostol in mid-trimester abortion. Although it has a longer induction to abortion interval, it appears to be better with respect to the completeness of evacuation, lesser blood loss, and better patient tolerance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Marine Medical Society
Journal of Marine Medical Society PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Psychological Morbidity of the COVID-19 Second Wave in Health-care Workers: A Cross-sectional Online Survey Adult Acne: Its Response to Therapy Sarcoidosis and Smoking: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Single Anesthesia ERCP and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Management of Common Bile Duct Stones Evolution and Innovations in Surgical Residency Education among Global Health Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1