从护士角度看选定医院的团队合作水平及相关因素:横断面研究

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING Nursing Practice Today Pub Date : 2023-11-19 DOI:10.18502/npt.v10i4.14082
Dominika Kohanová, Andrea Solgajová, Miriam Lušňáková, D. Bartoníčková
{"title":"从护士角度看选定医院的团队合作水平及相关因素:横断面研究","authors":"Dominika Kohanová, Andrea Solgajová, Miriam Lušňáková, D. Bartoníčková","doi":"10.18502/npt.v10i4.14082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Aim: Teamwork represents a fundamental prerequisite for providing quality and safe care. This study aimed to determine the level of teamwork and the factors that influence the level of teamwork in selected hospitals in the Slovak Republic. Methods & Materials: The descriptive cross-sectional study included 207 nurses from 12 departments of three district hospitals in the Slovak Republic. Data were collected between November 2022 and February 2023 using a questionnaire that evaluated nursing teamwork, the Nursing Teamwork Survey. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Nurses evaluated the level of teamwork as (3.74± 0.64), which means ideal less than 75% of the time during the last working shift. The best-rated subscale was the Shared mental model (4.17± 0.49), while the worst-rated subscale was Team orientation (2.47± 0.85). Differences in teamwork level were found based on unit type, education, number of hours worked, number of overtime hours, and perceived staff adequacy (p≤ 0.05). The correlation analysis revealed associations between teamwork and job satisfaction, teamwork satisfaction, subjective quality evaluation, and patient safety, as well as with the number of patients in the last shift, including the number of admitted and discharged patients. Conclusion: By regularly determining teamwork levels, it is possible to identify the strengths and weaknesses of nursing teams. Analyzing team weaknesses and implementing targeted measures can lead to strengthening teamwork and improving team functioning.","PeriodicalId":36883,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Practice Today","volume":"5 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The level of teamwork and associated factors in the selected hospitals from the nurses' perspective: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Dominika Kohanová, Andrea Solgajová, Miriam Lušňáková, D. Bartoníčková\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/npt.v10i4.14082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background & Aim: Teamwork represents a fundamental prerequisite for providing quality and safe care. This study aimed to determine the level of teamwork and the factors that influence the level of teamwork in selected hospitals in the Slovak Republic. Methods & Materials: The descriptive cross-sectional study included 207 nurses from 12 departments of three district hospitals in the Slovak Republic. Data were collected between November 2022 and February 2023 using a questionnaire that evaluated nursing teamwork, the Nursing Teamwork Survey. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Nurses evaluated the level of teamwork as (3.74± 0.64), which means ideal less than 75% of the time during the last working shift. The best-rated subscale was the Shared mental model (4.17± 0.49), while the worst-rated subscale was Team orientation (2.47± 0.85). Differences in teamwork level were found based on unit type, education, number of hours worked, number of overtime hours, and perceived staff adequacy (p≤ 0.05). The correlation analysis revealed associations between teamwork and job satisfaction, teamwork satisfaction, subjective quality evaluation, and patient safety, as well as with the number of patients in the last shift, including the number of admitted and discharged patients. Conclusion: By regularly determining teamwork levels, it is possible to identify the strengths and weaknesses of nursing teams. Analyzing team weaknesses and implementing targeted measures can lead to strengthening teamwork and improving team functioning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Practice Today\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Practice Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/npt.v10i4.14082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Practice Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/npt.v10i4.14082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:团队合作是提供优质安全医疗服务的基本前提。本研究旨在确定斯洛伐克共和国部分医院的团队合作水平以及影响团队合作水平的因素。 方法与材料:这项描述性横断面研究包括来自斯洛伐克共和国三家地区医院 12 个科室的 207 名护士。数据收集时间为 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 2 月,采用的是护理团队合作调查问卷。数据采用描述性和推论性统计方法进行分析。 结果如下护士对团队合作水平的评价为(3.74± 0.64),这意味着在上一个工作班次中,理想的团队合作时间少于 75%。评价最好的分量表是共享心理模型(4.17± 0.49),评价最差的分量表是团队导向(2.47± 0.85)。团队合作水平因单位类型、教育程度、工作时数、加班时数和感知到的人员充足性而存在差异(P≤ 0.05)。相关分析显示,团队合作与工作满意度、团队合作满意度、主观质量评价、患者安全以及上一班的患者人数(包括入院和出院患者人数)之间存在关联。 结论:通过定期测定团队合作水平,可以找出护理团队的优势和劣势。分析团队的薄弱环节并实施有针对性的措施,可以加强团队合作,改善团队功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The level of teamwork and associated factors in the selected hospitals from the nurses' perspective: A cross-sectional study
Background & Aim: Teamwork represents a fundamental prerequisite for providing quality and safe care. This study aimed to determine the level of teamwork and the factors that influence the level of teamwork in selected hospitals in the Slovak Republic. Methods & Materials: The descriptive cross-sectional study included 207 nurses from 12 departments of three district hospitals in the Slovak Republic. Data were collected between November 2022 and February 2023 using a questionnaire that evaluated nursing teamwork, the Nursing Teamwork Survey. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Nurses evaluated the level of teamwork as (3.74± 0.64), which means ideal less than 75% of the time during the last working shift. The best-rated subscale was the Shared mental model (4.17± 0.49), while the worst-rated subscale was Team orientation (2.47± 0.85). Differences in teamwork level were found based on unit type, education, number of hours worked, number of overtime hours, and perceived staff adequacy (p≤ 0.05). The correlation analysis revealed associations between teamwork and job satisfaction, teamwork satisfaction, subjective quality evaluation, and patient safety, as well as with the number of patients in the last shift, including the number of admitted and discharged patients. Conclusion: By regularly determining teamwork levels, it is possible to identify the strengths and weaknesses of nursing teams. Analyzing team weaknesses and implementing targeted measures can lead to strengthening teamwork and improving team functioning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Practice Today
Nursing Practice Today Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Functional capacity and its associated factors in older adults in the rural area in Brazil Predictors of prone position use in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units: A cross-sectional study Fear of COVID-19, stress, anxiety, depression, and insomnia among undergraduate nursing students in Oman The level of teamwork and associated factors in the selected hospitals from the nurses' perspective: A cross-sectional study A thematic analysis of professionalism from the perspective of nurse managers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1