在患有囊性纤维化且至少有一个 F508del 等位基因的个体中使用 elexacaftor+tezacaftor+ivacaftor: 系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia Pub Date : 2023-11-16 DOI:10.36416/1806-3756/e20230187
Luiz Vicente Ribeiro Ferreira da Silva Filho1, Rodrigo Abensur Athanazio2, Carolina Rodrigues Tonon3, Juliana Carvalho Ferreira2, Suzana Erico Tanni3
{"title":"在患有囊性纤维化且至少有一个 F508del 等位基因的个体中使用 elexacaftor+tezacaftor+ivacaftor: 系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Luiz Vicente Ribeiro Ferreira da Silva Filho1, Rodrigo Abensur Athanazio2, Carolina Rodrigues Tonon3, Juliana Carvalho Ferreira2, Suzana Erico Tanni3","doi":"10.36416/1806-3756/e20230187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the effect of treatment with the combination of three cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators-elexacaftor+tezacaftor+ivacaftor (ETI)-on important clinical endpoints in individuals with cystic fibrosis. Methods: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials that compared the use of ETI in individuals with CF and at least one F508del allele with that of placebo or with an active comparator such as other combinations of CFTR modulators, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations and the Patients of interest, Intervention to be studied, Comparison of interventions, and Outcome of interest (PICO) methodology. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to December 26th, 2022. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the quality of evidence was based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: We retrieved 54 studies in the primary search. Of these, 6 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed (1,127 patients; 577 and 550 in the intervention and control groups, respectively). The meta-analysis revealed that the use of ETI increased FEV1% [risk difference (RD), +10.47%; 95% CI, 6.88-14.06], reduced the number of acute pulmonary exacerbations (RD, −0.16; 95% CI, −0.28 to −0.04), and improved quality of life (RD, +14.93; 95% CI, 9.98-19.89) and BMI (RD, +1.07 kg/m2; 95% CI, 0.90-1.25). Adverse events did not differ between groups (RD, −0.03; 95% CI, −0.08 to 0.01), and none of the studies reported deaths. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that ETI treatment substantially improves clinically significant, patient-centered outcomes.","PeriodicalId":14845,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of elexacaftor+tezacaftor+ivacaftor in individuals with cystic fibrosis and at least one F508del allele: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Luiz Vicente Ribeiro Ferreira da Silva Filho1, Rodrigo Abensur Athanazio2, Carolina Rodrigues Tonon3, Juliana Carvalho Ferreira2, Suzana Erico Tanni3\",\"doi\":\"10.36416/1806-3756/e20230187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the effect of treatment with the combination of three cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators-elexacaftor+tezacaftor+ivacaftor (ETI)-on important clinical endpoints in individuals with cystic fibrosis. Methods: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials that compared the use of ETI in individuals with CF and at least one F508del allele with that of placebo or with an active comparator such as other combinations of CFTR modulators, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations and the Patients of interest, Intervention to be studied, Comparison of interventions, and Outcome of interest (PICO) methodology. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to December 26th, 2022. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the quality of evidence was based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: We retrieved 54 studies in the primary search. Of these, 6 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed (1,127 patients; 577 and 550 in the intervention and control groups, respectively). The meta-analysis revealed that the use of ETI increased FEV1% [risk difference (RD), +10.47%; 95% CI, 6.88-14.06], reduced the number of acute pulmonary exacerbations (RD, −0.16; 95% CI, −0.28 to −0.04), and improved quality of life (RD, +14.93; 95% CI, 9.98-19.89) and BMI (RD, +1.07 kg/m2; 95% CI, 0.90-1.25). Adverse events did not differ between groups (RD, −0.03; 95% CI, −0.08 to 0.01), and none of the studies reported deaths. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that ETI treatment substantially improves clinically significant, patient-centered outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20230187\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20230187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 目的评估三种囊性纤维化跨膜传导调节剂(CFTR)调节剂--lexacaftor+tezacaftor+ivacaftor(ETI)--的联合治疗对囊性纤维化患者重要临床终点的影响。研究方法这是一项系统性综述和荟萃分析,按照系统性综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)建议和 "感兴趣的患者"、"待研究的干预措施"、"干预措施的比较 "和 "感兴趣的结果"(PICO)方法,比较了在患有囊性纤维化且至少有一个 F508del 等位基因的患者中使用 ETI 与安慰剂或活性比较物(如其他 CFTR 调节剂组合)的随机临床试验。我们检索了以下数据库:MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、ClinicalTrials.gov(从开始到 2022 年 12 月 26 日)。偏倚风险采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具进行评估,证据质量采用建议评估、发展和评价分级法(GRADE)。结果我们在主要搜索中检索到 54 项研究。其中,6 项符合纳入标准并进行了分析(1,127 名患者;干预组和对照组分别为 577 人和 550 人)。荟萃分析表明,使用 ETI 可提高 FEV1% [风险差异 (RD),+10.47%;95% CI,6.88-14.06],减少急性肺部恶化次数(RD,-0.16;95% CI,-0.28--0.04),改善生活质量(RD,+14.93;95% CI,9.98-19.89)和 BMI(RD,+1.07 kg/m2;95% CI,0.90-1.25)。不良事件在不同组间没有差异(RD,-0.03;95% CI,-0.08 至 0.01),没有一项研究报告死亡病例。结论:我们的研究结果表明,ETI 治疗可显著改善以患者为中心的临床效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of elexacaftor+tezacaftor+ivacaftor in individuals with cystic fibrosis and at least one F508del allele: a systematic review and meta-analysis
ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the effect of treatment with the combination of three cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators-elexacaftor+tezacaftor+ivacaftor (ETI)-on important clinical endpoints in individuals with cystic fibrosis. Methods: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials that compared the use of ETI in individuals with CF and at least one F508del allele with that of placebo or with an active comparator such as other combinations of CFTR modulators, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations and the Patients of interest, Intervention to be studied, Comparison of interventions, and Outcome of interest (PICO) methodology. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to December 26th, 2022. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the quality of evidence was based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: We retrieved 54 studies in the primary search. Of these, 6 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed (1,127 patients; 577 and 550 in the intervention and control groups, respectively). The meta-analysis revealed that the use of ETI increased FEV1% [risk difference (RD), +10.47%; 95% CI, 6.88-14.06], reduced the number of acute pulmonary exacerbations (RD, −0.16; 95% CI, −0.28 to −0.04), and improved quality of life (RD, +14.93; 95% CI, 9.98-19.89) and BMI (RD, +1.07 kg/m2; 95% CI, 0.90-1.25). Adverse events did not differ between groups (RD, −0.03; 95% CI, −0.08 to 0.01), and none of the studies reported deaths. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that ETI treatment substantially improves clinically significant, patient-centered outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia
Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
118
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Pulmonology publishes scientific articles that contribute to the improvement of knowledge in the field of the lung diseases and related areas.
期刊最新文献
Acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease after transthoracic biopsy. Chronic lung disease of prematurity and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Clarifying the face of cannabis lung. Correspondence about the article: Asthma in the Brazilian Unified Health Care System: an epidemiological analysis from 2008 to 2021Authors' replyAsthma in the Brazilian Unified Health Care System an epidemiological analysis from 2008 to 2021Higher Asthma Mortality in Elders and Female Subjects in Brazil A 10-year Series [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care. Drug-induced lung disease: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1