ChatGPT:它对我们的青光眼患者有好处吗?

Gloria Wu, David A. Lee, Weichen Zhao, Adrial Wong, Sahej Sidhu
{"title":"ChatGPT:它对我们的青光眼患者有好处吗?","authors":"Gloria Wu, David A. Lee, Weichen Zhao, Adrial Wong, Sahej Sidhu","doi":"10.3389/fopht.2023.1260415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our study investigates ChatGPT and its ability to communicate with glaucoma patients.We inputted eight glaucoma-related questions/topics found on the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO)’s website into ChatGPT. We used the Flesch–Kincaid test, Gunning Fog Index, SMOG Index, and Dale–Chall readability formula to evaluate the comprehensibility of its responses for patients. ChatGPT’s answers were compared with those found on the AAO’s website.ChatGPT’s responses required reading comprehension of a higher grade level (average = grade 12.5 ± 1.6) than that of the text on the AAO’s website (average = 9.4 grade ± 3.5), (0.0384). For the eight responses, the key ophthalmic terms appeared 34 out of 86 times in the ChatGPT responses vs. 86 out of 86 times in the text on the AAO’s website. The term “eye doctor” appeared once in the ChatGPT text, but the formal term “ophthalmologist” did not appear. The term “ophthalmologist” appears 26 times on the AAO’s website. The word counts of the answers produced by ChatGPT and those on the AAO’s website were similar (p = 0.571), with phrases of a homogenous length.ChatGPT trains on the texts, phrases, and algorithms inputted by software engineers. As ophthalmologists, through our websites and journals, we should consider encoding the phrase “see an ophthalmologist”. Our medical assistants should sit with patients during their appointments to ensure that the text is accurate and that they fully comprehend its meaning. ChatGPT is effective for providing general information such as definitions or potential treatment options for glaucoma. However, ChatGPT has a tendency toward repetitive answers and, due to their elevated readability scores, these could be too difficult for a patient to read.","PeriodicalId":73096,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ChatGPT: is it good for our glaucoma patients?\",\"authors\":\"Gloria Wu, David A. Lee, Weichen Zhao, Adrial Wong, Sahej Sidhu\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fopht.2023.1260415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our study investigates ChatGPT and its ability to communicate with glaucoma patients.We inputted eight glaucoma-related questions/topics found on the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO)’s website into ChatGPT. We used the Flesch–Kincaid test, Gunning Fog Index, SMOG Index, and Dale–Chall readability formula to evaluate the comprehensibility of its responses for patients. ChatGPT’s answers were compared with those found on the AAO’s website.ChatGPT’s responses required reading comprehension of a higher grade level (average = grade 12.5 ± 1.6) than that of the text on the AAO’s website (average = 9.4 grade ± 3.5), (0.0384). For the eight responses, the key ophthalmic terms appeared 34 out of 86 times in the ChatGPT responses vs. 86 out of 86 times in the text on the AAO’s website. The term “eye doctor” appeared once in the ChatGPT text, but the formal term “ophthalmologist” did not appear. The term “ophthalmologist” appears 26 times on the AAO’s website. The word counts of the answers produced by ChatGPT and those on the AAO’s website were similar (p = 0.571), with phrases of a homogenous length.ChatGPT trains on the texts, phrases, and algorithms inputted by software engineers. As ophthalmologists, through our websites and journals, we should consider encoding the phrase “see an ophthalmologist”. Our medical assistants should sit with patients during their appointments to ensure that the text is accurate and that they fully comprehend its meaning. ChatGPT is effective for providing general information such as definitions or potential treatment options for glaucoma. However, ChatGPT has a tendency toward repetitive answers and, due to their elevated readability scores, these could be too difficult for a patient to read.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fopht.2023.1260415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fopht.2023.1260415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们将美国眼科学会(AAO)网站上与青光眼相关的八个问题/主题输入 ChatGPT。我们使用 Flesch-Kincaid 测试、Gunning Fog 指数、SMOG 指数和 Dale-Chall 可读性公式来评估其回答对患者的可理解性。我们将 ChatGPT 的回答与 AAO 网站上的回答进行了比较。ChatGPT 的回答所要求的阅读理解能力(平均 = 12.5 级 ± 1.6)高于 AAO 网站上的文字(平均 = 9.4 级 ± 3.5),(0.0384)。在八个回复中,关键眼科术语在 ChatGPT 回复中出现了 86 次,占 34 次;而在 AAO 网站上的文本中出现了 86 次,占 86 次。眼科医生 "一词在 ChatGPT 文本中出现过一次,但正式术语 "眼科医生 "没有出现。眼科医生 "一词在 AAO 网站上出现了 26 次。ChatGPT 生成的答案字数与 AAO 网站上的答案字数相似(p = 0.571),短语长度一致。作为眼科医生,我们应该考虑通过网站和期刊对 "看眼科医生 "这一短语进行编码。我们的医疗助理应在患者就诊时与他们坐在一起,确保文字准确无误,并确保他们完全理解其含义。ChatGPT 对于提供青光眼的定义或潜在治疗方案等一般信息非常有效。但是,ChatGPT 有重复回答的倾向,而且由于其可读性得分较高,患者可能难以阅读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ChatGPT: is it good for our glaucoma patients?
Our study investigates ChatGPT and its ability to communicate with glaucoma patients.We inputted eight glaucoma-related questions/topics found on the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO)’s website into ChatGPT. We used the Flesch–Kincaid test, Gunning Fog Index, SMOG Index, and Dale–Chall readability formula to evaluate the comprehensibility of its responses for patients. ChatGPT’s answers were compared with those found on the AAO’s website.ChatGPT’s responses required reading comprehension of a higher grade level (average = grade 12.5 ± 1.6) than that of the text on the AAO’s website (average = 9.4 grade ± 3.5), (0.0384). For the eight responses, the key ophthalmic terms appeared 34 out of 86 times in the ChatGPT responses vs. 86 out of 86 times in the text on the AAO’s website. The term “eye doctor” appeared once in the ChatGPT text, but the formal term “ophthalmologist” did not appear. The term “ophthalmologist” appears 26 times on the AAO’s website. The word counts of the answers produced by ChatGPT and those on the AAO’s website were similar (p = 0.571), with phrases of a homogenous length.ChatGPT trains on the texts, phrases, and algorithms inputted by software engineers. As ophthalmologists, through our websites and journals, we should consider encoding the phrase “see an ophthalmologist”. Our medical assistants should sit with patients during their appointments to ensure that the text is accurate and that they fully comprehend its meaning. ChatGPT is effective for providing general information such as definitions or potential treatment options for glaucoma. However, ChatGPT has a tendency toward repetitive answers and, due to their elevated readability scores, these could be too difficult for a patient to read.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the PlusoptiX A16 and vision screener V100. UV light and the ocular lens: a review of exposure models and resulting biomolecular changes. Diagnostic accuracy of a modularized, virtual-reality-based automated pupillometer for detection of relative afferent pupillary defect in unilateral optic neuropathies. Advances in the management of intraocular foreign bodies. Large animal model species in pluripotent stem cell therapy research and development for retinal diseases: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1